Presidential approval · Approval
Approve 43% · Disapprove 56%
- Field dates
- May 15–Jun 21, 2026
- Sample
- 5,809 LV
- Sponsor / client
- Not reported in archive
- Partisan sponsorship
- No partisan sponsorship flag
Historical accuracy is measured against certified results. Current-cycle records come from the canonical, deduplicated archive and do not by themselves change the sealed forecast.
79 eligible historical polls across 4 represented cycles passed the published history identity checks. Historical bias is descriptive and is kept separate from sponsor or client affiliation.
Archive source date 2026-09-09 · bundled copy. Archive records may be newer than the sealed forecast; inclusion here does not mean the forecast uses them.
7 shown · 31 total
Approve 43% · Disapprove 56%
Cindy Hyde-Smith 47% · Scott Colom 41%
Dem 51% · Rep 43%
Approve 43% · Disapprove 56%
Mary Peltola 46% · Dan Sullivan 45%
Nick Begich III 48% · Matt Schultz 37%
Mary Peltola 45% · Dan Sullivan 46%
29 shown · 79 total
| Cycle | Race | Type | Field end | Sample | Poll | Result | Error |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2020_Pres-G_VA | Pres-G | 2020-10-30 | 690 | D+11.0 | D+10.2 | D+0.8 |
| 2020 | 2020_Pres-G_TX | Pres-G | 2020-10-30 | 926 | D+1.0 | R+5.6 | D+6.6 |
| 2020 | 2020_Pres-G_SC | Pres-G | 2020-10-30 | 880 | R+9.0 | R+11.7 | D+2.7 |
| 2020 | 2020_Pres-G_PA | Pres-G | 2020-10-30 | 1,417 | D+7.0 | D+1.2 | D+5.8 |
| 2020 | 2020_Pres-G_NV | Pres-G | 2020-10-30 | 1,442 | D+7.0 | D+2.4 | D+4.6 |
| 2020 | 2020_Pres-G_NC | Pres-G | 2020-10-30 | 908 | D+2.0 | R+1.4 | D+3.4 |
| 2020 | 2020_Pres-G_MS | Pres-G | 2020-10-30 | 562 | R+14.0 | R+16.6 | D+2.5 |
| 2020 | 2020_Pres-G_MN | Pres-G | 2020-10-30 | 1,259 | D+8.0 | D+7.1 | D+0.9 |
| 2020 | 2020_Pres-G_KS | Pres-G | 2020-10-30 | 1,121 | R+14.0 | R+14.7 | D+0.7 |
| 2020 | 2020_Pres-G_IA | Pres-G | 2020-10-30 | 951 | R+2.0 | R+8.2 | D+6.2 |
| 2020 | 2020_Pres-G_GA | Pres-G | 2020-10-30 | 1,036 | D+2.0 | D+0.2 | D+1.8 |
| 2020 | 2020_Pres-G_FL | Pres-G | 2020-10-30 | 1,202 | D+3.0 | R+3.4 | D+6.4 |
| 2020 | 2020_Pres-G_CO | Pres-G | 2020-10-30 | 709 | D+12.0 | D+13.5 | R+1.5 |
| 2020 | 2020_Pres-G_AZ | Pres-G | 2020-10-30 | 1,195 | D+3.0 | D+0.3 | D+2.7 |
| 2020 | 2020_Pres-G_AL | Pres-G | 2020-10-30 | 1,045 | R+20.0 | R+25.5 | D+5.5 |
| 2020 | 2020_Pres-G_US | Pres-G | 2020-10-29 | 1,403 | D+10.0 | D+4.5 | D+5.5 |
| 2020 | 2020_Sen-G_SC | Sen-G | 2020-10-25 | 1,196 | 0 | R+10.3 | D+10.3 |
| 2020 | 2020_Pres-G_SC | Pres-G | 2020-10-25 | 1,196 | R+6.0 | R+11.7 | D+5.7 |
| 2020 | 2020_Sen-G_TX | Sen-G | 2020-10-24 | 1,018 | R+2.0 | R+9.6 | D+7.6 |
| 2020 | 2020_Pres-G_TX | Pres-G | 2020-10-24 | 1,018 | D+1.0 | R+5.6 | D+6.6 |
| 2020 | 2020_Pres-G_US | Pres-G | 2020-10-20 | 811 | D+10.2 | D+4.5 | D+5.7 |
| 2020 | 2020_Sen-G_TX | Sen-G | 2020-10-17 | 933 | R+3.0 | R+9.6 | D+6.6 |
| 2020 | 2020_Sen-G_NC | Sen-G | 2020-10-17 | 929 | D+4.0 | R+1.8 | D+5.8 |
| 2020 | 2020_Sen-G_MI | Sen-G | 2020-10-17 | 830 | D+5.0 | D+1.7 | D+3.3 |
| 2020 | 2020_Pres-G_TX | Pres-G | 2020-10-17 | 933 | D+1.0 | R+5.6 | D+6.6 |
| 2020 | 2020_Pres-G_NC | Pres-G | 2020-10-17 | 929 | D+4.0 | R+1.4 | D+5.3 |
| 2020 | 2020_Pres-G_MI | Pres-G | 2020-10-17 | 830 | D+5.0 | D+2.8 | D+2.2 |
| 2019 | 2019_Gov-GR_LA | Gov-G | 2019-11-06 | 1,434 | D+0.4 | D+2.7 | R+2.3 |
| 2019 | 2019_Gov-O_LA | Gov-G | 2019-10-07 | 1,525 | D+22.0 | D+19.2 | D+2.8 |
1 further row is held in this pollster’s history shard as within-party or nonpartisan contests (Prim). Those carry no D/R orientation, so they are excluded from the error, bias and coverage figures above and from the table.
Method · historical final-three-week D/R general-election rows plus verified historical supplement; min n=5
Definition · bias_D is poll D-R margin minus actual D-R margin; positive overstates Democrats.
A missing sample, sponsor or source is labeled unavailable; it is never reconstructed.
Poll data via VoteHub, used under CC BY 4.0. Poll data from The New York Times, used under CC BY 4.0.