Mississippi · U.S. Senate
Open this race on The Map ↗Cindy Hyde-Smith is narrowly favored to win. Projected candidate margin: Cindy Hyde-Smith over Scott Colom by 5.0 points. No two-party forecast is published for this race: this race is between an independent and a major-party candidate, so the forecast is published per candidate rather than as a two-party margin.
Show all others (1)
Official ballot sources: Ty Pinkins (checked 2026-08-31).
high / low: vote share (%) in the middle 80 in 100 simulations
About this field
Not competitive.
Forecast share averages the simulated vote. Win chance counts how often a candidate wins. A wider range of outcomes can give a candidate a higher win chance despite a lower average share.
The polls
Ledger weighted average R+9.0Used by the forecast: 1 poll (60-day half-life) · measured R+8.0 · after the fitted poll-error shift R+9.61 recorded poll · 1 eligible for the aggregate · 1 with positive weight
| Fieldwork | Added | Pollster | Result | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| from 2026-08-05 | Data for Progress ↗Way to Lead PAC | R+6.0D 41% · R 47% | 1,018 LV |
How the candidate lead was built
Follow each contribution to the margin. Wider ribbons mean more percentage points. Tap an input for its calculation and source.
The signed totals combine at the forecast. Displayed values are rounded. This is a modeled partisan coordinate.
Cindy Hyde-Smith leads Scott Colom by 5.0 points (forecast share difference). The named candidate forecast also accounts for the field and election rules; its lead is a separate quantity from the partisan coordinate above.
The two-party D-versus-R coordinate, step by step
The walk above decomposes the published candidate lead. The model also carries a latent Democrat-minus-Republican coordinate, which is the quantity chamber seat and control arithmetic runs on. It is shown here at the same steps, as a secondary reading — it is not this race’s published forecast margin.
| After this step | D−R coordinate |
|---|---|
| Fundamentals | R+16.5 |
| National environment | R+14.5 |
| Campaign finance | R+14.5 |
| This race’s polls | R+13.2 |
| Expert ratings | R+13.2 |
| Election rules & guards | R+15.1 |
| Historical calibration | R+15.1 |
| The candidate field | R+15.1 |
All calculations & sources
The candidate field +8.534 points
What the field itself contributes: the third principals on the ballot and the election rule, which a two-party coordinate has nowhere to put.
National environment +1.786 points
How much of the national climate reaches this race’s leader-versus-runner-up gap.
This race’s polls +1.158 points
What this race’s admitted polls move the leader-versus-runner-up gap by.
Fundamentals −14.785 points
What the fitted structural model contributes to the gap between the leader and the runner-up, before any of this cycle’s evidence.
Election rules & guards −1.726 points
Certified election-mechanics terms — ballot rules, guards and locks — as they bear on these two candidates.
These are the fitted model’s named contributions to the partisan coordinate, before the candidate-field calculation.
| Named factor | Contribution |
|---|---|
| FundamentalsThe admitted fitted baseline. Its surviving variables differ by office; the source detail above identifies those used for this race. | −16.46 |
| National environmentThe national environment’s contribution to the prior. Polling can attenuate its influence; this value is not the national polling margin. | +1.99 |
| Structural terrain safeguardA bounded pull toward presidential terrain in heavily partisan states. | −1.92 |
| This race's pollsAdmitted head-to-head polls of this race, recency- and quality-weighted. | +1.29 |
| Other factors | −0.00 |
Recent elections
| Election | Result | Votes cast |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 · U.S. Senate ↗ | R+10.2 | 1,311,354 |
| 2014 · U.S. Senate ↗ | R+22.5 | 631,858 |
| 2008 · U.S. Senate ↗ | R+22.9 | 1,247,026 |
| 2002 · U.S. Senate ↗ | Not a D–R contestThe ballot was not a Democrat versus a Republican; a D/R margin cannot identify the winner. | 630,495 |
Margins compare Democratic and Republican vote totals. Nonstandard ballots are labeled separately.
The money
Cindy Hyde-Smith ↗
R$3.8Mraised
$2.5M cash on handFiling through 06/30/2026
Scott Colom ↗
D$2.4Mraised
$847K cash on handFiling through 06/30/2026
Ty Pinkins ↗
I$98Kraised
$5K cash on handFiling through 06/30/2026
Bar length compares reported receipts in this race; the tick marks cash on hand. A missing filing stays blank rather than becoming $0.
One more fundraising reportCall the Map · $0
The candidates are comfortably out-fundraising the website covering them. A little rude, perhaps, but statistically unsurprising.
- Received so far
- $0
- Measured compute
- $26,188.58
Ko-fi and Buy Me a Coffee receipts are counted through Sep 1, 2026. Measured compute prices model runs at standard published API rates; it is not what I paid. Hosting, data and subscriptions, the domain and my own time are not counted. Donations buy gratitude, never a forecast adjustment.
Outside spending
Support + opposition · separate from receiptsFor and against Scott Colom$1.3M
3 spending groups
| Group | For | Against |
|---|---|---|
| Fulcrum PAC | $880K | $0 |
| BlackPAC | $411K | $0 |
| Field Team 6 Inc. | $11K | $0 |
For and against Cindy Hyde-Smith$1.6M
3 spending groups
| Group | For | Against |
|---|---|---|
| AB PAC | $0 | $1.4M |
| Conservative Leaders of America | $99K | $0 |
| NEW SOUTHERN MAJORITY IE PAC | $0 | $52K |
Includes primary spending. Opposition is recorded against its named target; no benefit to another candidate is assumed.
No outside spending matched: Ty Pinkins.
FEC filings · through 06/30/2026 · Definitions & method
Race context
- Forecast votes cast
- 762,410
- Forecast turnout
- 35.5% of the voting-eligible population
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+23.1
Statewide, 35.9% of the voting-eligible population is projected to cast a ballot; the lower figure above is the share projected to vote in this race.
Population profile Select a measure for its source and denominator
U.S. Census Bureau, 2022 American Community Survey 5-year estimates ↗
Coverage
2 stories
- Scott Colom has a ‘puncher’s chance’ against Cindy Hyde-Smith in Senate election ↗
Mississippi Today · Aug 30
- Mississippi cattle producers and politicians lament Trump’s imported beef plan ↗
Mississippi Today · Aug 26