GOV-NJ
Mikie Sherrill 50.4% · Jack Ciattarelli 48.4%
- Field dates
- Oct 25–Oct 28, 2025
- Sample
- 1,000 LV
- Sponsor / client
- The Hill,WPIX
- Partisan sponsorship
- No partisan sponsorship flag
Historical accuracy is measured against certified results. Current-cycle records come from the canonical, deduplicated archive and do not by themselves change the sealed forecast.
230 eligible historical polls across 11 represented cycles passed the published history identity checks. Historical bias is descriptive and is kept separate from sponsor or client affiliation.
Archive source date 2026-09-09 · bundled copy. Archive records may be newer than the sealed forecast; inclusion here does not mean the forecast uses them.
12 shown · 141 total
Mikie Sherrill 50.4% · Jack Ciattarelli 48.4%
Approve 45.3% · Disapprove 48.3%
Dem 43.9% · Rep 42.5%
Abigail Spanberger 51.9% · Winsome Earle-Sears 42%
Mikie Sherrill 43.3% · Jack Ciattarelli 42.9%
Dem 43.3% · Rep 43%
Approve 44.7% · Disapprove 47.3%
Vivek Ramaswamy 48.7% · Amy Acton 39.4%
Sherrod Brown 43.7% · Jon Husted 49.5%
Colin Allred 58% · Emily Morgul 4% · Valoree Swanson 3% · Terry Virts 1%
Michael Whatley 41.4% · Roy Cooper 46.7%
Approve 45.7% · Disapprove 46.8%
30 shown · 230 total
| Cycle | Race | Type | Field end | Sample | Poll | Result | Error |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2016_Pres-G_WI | Pres-G | 2016-10-28 | 400 | D+6.0 | R+0.8 | D+6.8 |
| 2016 | 2016_Sen-G_OH | Sen-G | 2016-10-27 | 800 | R+14.0 | R+20.9 | D+6.9 |
| 2016 | 2016_Sen-G_NV | Sen-G | 2016-10-27 | 550 | R+4.0 | D+2.5 | R+6.5 |
| 2016 | 2016_Sen-G_NC | Sen-G | 2016-10-27 | 650 | R+4.0 | R+5.7 | D+1.7 |
| 2016 | 2016_Sen-G_FL | Sen-G | 2016-10-27 | 500 | R+2.0 | R+7.7 | D+5.7 |
| 2016 | 2016_Pres-G_OH | Pres-G | 2016-10-27 | 800 | 0 | R+8.1 | D+8.1 |
| 2016 | 2016_Pres-G_NV | Pres-G | 2016-10-27 | 550 | D+2.0 | D+2.5 | R+0.5 |
| 2016 | 2016_Pres-G_NC | Pres-G | 2016-10-27 | 650 | D+3.0 | R+3.7 | D+6.7 |
| 2016 | 2016_Pres-G_FL | Pres-G | 2016-10-27 | 500 | D+1.0 | R+1.2 | D+2.2 |
| 2016 | 2016_Sen-G_PA | Sen-G | 2016-10-26 | 550 | D+2.0 | R+1.4 | D+3.4 |
| 2016 | 2016_Pres-G_PA | Pres-G | 2016-10-26 | 550 | D+5.0 | R+0.7 | D+5.7 |
| 2016 | 2016_Pres-G_MI | Pres-G | 2016-10-26 | 500 | D+7.0 | R+0.2 | D+7.2 |
| 2016 | 2016_Sen-G_NH | Sen-G | 2016-10-24 | 600 | R+6.0 | D+0.1 | R+6.1 |
| 2016 | 2016_Pres-G_NH | Pres-G | 2016-10-24 | 600 | D+3.0 | D+0.4 | D+2.6 |
| 2016 | 2016_Sen-G_ID | Sen-G | 2016-10-22 | 1,023 | R+33.0 | R+38.4 | D+5.4 |
| 2016 | 2016_Pres-G_ID | Pres-G | 2016-10-22 | 1,023 | R+29.0 | R+31.8 | D+2.8 |
| 2016 | 2016_Sen-G_PA | Sen-G | 2016-10-18 | 800 | R+3.2 | R+1.4 | R+1.8 |
| 2016 | 2016_Sen-G_NH | Sen-G | 2016-10-18 | 900 | R+0.1 | D+0.1 | R+0.2 |
| 2016 | 2016_Sen-G_MO | Sen-G | 2016-10-18 | 600 | D+0.4 | R+2.8 | D+3.2 |
| 2016 | 2016_Pres-G_UT | Pres-G | 2016-10-18 | 700 | R+2.6 | R+18.1 | D+15.5 |
| 2016 | 2016_Pres-G_PA | Pres-G | 2016-10-18 | 800 | D+4.0 | R+0.7 | D+4.7 |
| 2016 | 2016_Pres-G_NH | Pres-G | 2016-10-18 | 900 | D+8.0 | D+0.4 | D+7.6 |
| 2016 | 2016_Pres-G_MO | Pres-G | 2016-10-18 | 600 | R+8.0 | R+18.6 | D+10.6 |
| 2014 | 2014_House-G_MA-9 | House-G | 2014-10-28 | 410 | D+5.0 | D+10.0 | R+5.0 |
| 2014 | 2014_House-G_MA-6 | House-G | 2014-10-28 | 400 | R+2.0 | D+13.8 | R+15.8 |
| 2014 | 2014_Gov-G_MA | Gov-G | 2014-10-28 | 627 | R+6.0 | R+1.9 | R+4.1 |
| 2014 | 2014_House-G_MA-9 | House-G | 2014-10-18 | 302 | D+3.0 | D+10.0 | R+7.0 |
| 2014 | 2014_House-G_MA-6 | House-G | 2014-10-14 | 400 | R+3.0 | D+13.8 | R+16.8 |
| 2013 | 2013_Gov-G_VA | Gov-G | 2013-10-28 | 874 | D+2.0 | D+2.5 | R+0.5 |
| 2013 | 2013_Sen-GS_MA | Sen-G | 2013-06-20 | 1,422 | D+10.0 | D+10.2 | R+0.2 |
5 further rows are held in this pollster’s history shard as within-party or nonpartisan contests (NYC-G · Prim). Those carry no D/R orientation, so they are excluded from the error, bias and coverage figures above and from the table.
Method · historical final-three-week D/R general-election rows plus verified historical supplement; min n=5
Definition · bias_D is poll D-R margin minus actual D-R margin; positive overstates Democrats.
A missing sample, sponsor or source is labeled unavailable; it is never reconstructed.
Poll data via VoteHub, used under CC BY 4.0. Poll data from The New York Times, used under CC BY 4.0.