Ohio · Governor
Amy Acton is slightly favored to flip the Ohio governorship. Predicted margin: D+1.2.
Under each share, its likely range (80 in 100 simulations)
Background
DeWine term-limited; open seat drew a real D field.
Forecast history
Latest reading · Oct 28 · first published Sep 9 · 80% range · margin points R+7.0 to D+9.4. Methodology
About this series
Reconstructed with the current model Aug 1 – Sep 8 and Sep 16 – Sep 18; published readings Sep 9 – Oct 28. Each reconstructed day is the current model on that day’s own inputs, not a forecast published then. Corrections are dated in the changelog.
Faded: CTMM 2.2 reconstructed history: computed after the fact with each date's available polls and environment, without expert ratings; not an issued forecast. Issued forecasts begin at the launch marker.
CTMM 2.2 readings for 2026-09-16, 2026-09-17, 2026-09-18 were computed after the fact with each day's available inputs: no edition was issued on those days. Not an issued forecast.
Data table
| Date | Margin | Chance | 80% range | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28 | D+1.2 | D win 58.0% | R+7.0 to D+9.4 | Published forecast |
| Oct 27 | D+0.9 | D win 56.5% | R+7.2 to D+9.1 | Published forecast |
| Oct 26 | D+1.0 | D win 57.0% | R+7.2 to D+9.2 | Published forecast |
| Oct 25 | D+1.0 | D win 56.9% | R+7.2 to D+9.2 | Published forecast |
| Oct 24 | D+1.0 | D win 56.8% | R+7.2 to D+9.2 | Published forecast |
| Oct 23 | D+1.0 | D win 56.7% | R+7.2 to D+9.2 | Published forecast |
| Oct 22 | D+1.0 | D win 56.6% | R+7.3 to D+9.2 | Published forecast |
| Oct 21 | D+1.0 | D win 57.0% | R+7.2 to D+9.2 | Published forecast |
| Oct 20 | D+0.9 | D win 56.3% | R+7.3 to D+9.1 | Published forecast |
| Oct 19 | D+1.2 | D win 58.2% | R+7.0 to D+9.4 | Published forecast |
| Oct 18 | D+1.2 | D win 58.1% | R+7.0 to D+9.4 | Published forecast |
| Oct 17 | D+1.2 | D win 58.0% | R+7.1 to D+9.4 | Published forecast |
| Oct 16 | D+0.8 | D win 55.4% | R+7.4 to D+9.1 | Published forecast |
| Oct 15 | D+0.8 | D win 55.3% | R+7.4 to D+9.1 | Published forecast |
| Oct 14 | D+0.8 | D win 55.1% | R+7.5 to D+9.0 | Published forecast |
| Oct 13 | D+0.8 | D win 55.0% | R+7.5 to D+9.0 | Published forecast |
| Oct 12 | D+0.7 | D win 54.8% | R+7.5 to D+9.0 | Published forecast |
| Oct 11 | D+0.7 | D win 54.8% | R+7.5 to D+9.0 | Published forecast |
| Oct 10 | D+0.7 | D win 54.7% | R+7.6 to D+9.0 | Published forecast |
| Oct 9 | D+0.7 | D win 54.6% | R+7.6 to D+9.0 | Published forecast |
| Oct 8 | D+1.4 | D win 58.6% | R+6.9 to D+9.7 | Published forecast |
| Oct 7 | D+0.7 | D win 54.6% | R+7.6 to D+9.0 | Published forecast |
| Oct 6 | D+0.6 | D win 53.6% | R+7.7 to D+8.9 | Published forecast |
| Oct 5 | D+0.5 | D win 53.2% | R+7.8 to D+8.9 | Published forecast |
| Oct 4 | D+0.4 | D win 52.2% | R+7.9 to D+8.7 | Published forecast |
| Oct 3 | D+0.4 | D win 52.4% | R+8.0 to D+8.7 | Published forecast |
| Oct 2 | D+0.3 | D win 52.4% | R+8.0 to D+8.7 | Published forecast |
| Oct 1 | D+0.3 | D win 51.8% | R+8.0 to D+8.7 | Published forecast |
| Sep 30 | D+0.3 | D win 51.8% | R+8.0 to D+8.6 | Published forecast |
| Sep 29 | EVEN | R win 50.3% | R+8.4 to D+8.3 | Published forecast |
| Sep 28 | R+1.3 | R win 57.8% | R+9.8 to D+7.3 | Published forecast |
| Sep 27 | R+1.3 | R win 57.6% | R+9.9 to D+7.3 | Published forecast |
| Sep 26 | R+1.3 | R win 58.3% | R+9.9 to D+7.3 | Published forecast |
| Sep 25 | R+1.3 | R win 57.9% | R+9.9 to D+7.2 | Published forecast |
| Sep 24 | R+1.3 | R win 58.4% | R+9.9 to D+7.2 | Published forecast |
| Sep 23 | R+1.3 | R win 58.3% | R+9.9 to D+7.2 | Published forecast |
| Sep 22 | R+1.4 | R win 59.0% | R+9.9 to D+7.2 | Published forecast |
| Sep 21 | R+1.4 | R win 59.0% | R+9.9 to D+7.2 | Published forecast |
| Sep 20 | R+1.4 | R win 58.2% | R+9.9 to D+7.2 | Published forecast |
| Sep 19 | R+1.4 | R win 58.4% | R+9.9 to D+7.1 | Published forecast |
| Sep 18 | R+1.4 | R win 58.0% | R+10.0 to D+7.1 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 17 | R+1.4 | R win 58.1% | R+10.0 to D+7.1 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 16 | R+1.4 | R win 58.1% | R+10.0 to D+7.1 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 15 | R+2.1 | R win 62.2% | R+10.8 to D+6.6 | Published forecast |
| Sep 14 | R+2.1 | R win 62.1% | R+10.8 to D+6.6 | Published forecast |
| Sep 13 | R+2.1 | R win 62.5% | R+10.8 to D+6.6 | Published forecast |
| Sep 12 | R+2.1 | R win 62.2% | R+10.8 to D+6.6 | Published forecast |
| Sep 11 | R+2.1 | R win 62.2% | R+10.8 to D+6.6 | Published forecast |
| Sep 10 | R+2.1 | R win 62.4% | R+10.8 to D+6.6 | Published forecast |
| Sep 9 | R+2.3 | R win 62.8% | R+11.0 to D+6.4 | Published forecast |
| Sep 8 | R+2.2 | R win 62.1% | R+10.9 to D+6.5 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 7 | R+2.2 | R win 62.2% | R+10.9 to D+6.5 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 6 | R+2.2 | R win 62.3% | R+10.9 to D+6.5 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 5 | R+2.2 | R win 62.4% | R+10.9 to D+6.5 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 4 | R+2.2 | R win 62.5% | R+10.9 to D+6.5 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 3 | R+2.2 | R win 62.5% | R+10.9 to D+6.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 2 | R+2.3 | R win 62.6% | R+10.9 to D+6.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 1 | R+2.2 | R win 62.6% | R+10.9 to D+6.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 31 | R+2.2 | R win 62.6% | R+10.9 to D+6.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 30 | R+2.3 | R win 62.7% | R+10.9 to D+6.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 29 | R+2.3 | R win 62.7% | R+10.9 to D+6.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 28 | R+2.3 | R win 62.8% | R+11.0 to D+6.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 27 | R+2.3 | R win 62.8% | R+11.0 to D+6.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 26 | R+2.3 | R win 63.0% | R+11.0 to D+6.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 25 | R+2.3 | R win 62.9% | R+11.0 to D+6.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 24 | R+2.3 | R win 63.0% | R+11.0 to D+6.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 23 | R+2.3 | R win 63.1% | R+11.0 to D+6.3 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 22 | R+2.3 | R win 62.8% | R+11.0 to D+6.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 21 | R+2.3 | R win 63.7% | R+11.0 to D+6.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 20 | R+2.3 | R win 63.8% | R+11.0 to D+6.3 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 19 | R+2.3 | R win 63.8% | R+11.0 to D+6.3 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 18 | R+2.3 | R win 63.9% | R+11.0 to D+6.3 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 17 | R+2.4 | R win 63.9% | R+11.0 to D+6.3 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 16 | R+2.4 | R win 64.0% | R+11.0 to D+6.3 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 15 | R+2.5 | R win 64.4% | R+11.3 to D+6.3 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 14 | R+2.5 | R win 64.6% | R+11.3 to D+6.3 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 13 | R+1.9 | R win 61.2% | R+10.9 to D+7.0 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 12 | R+1.9 | R win 61.2% | R+10.9 to D+7.0 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 11 | R+1.9 | R win 61.3% | R+10.9 to D+7.0 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 10 | R+2.0 | R win 61.4% | R+10.9 to D+7.0 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 9 | R+2.0 | R win 61.5% | R+10.9 to D+7.0 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 8 | R+2.0 | R win 61.5% | R+11.0 to D+7.0 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 7 | R+2.0 | R win 61.5% | R+11.0 to D+7.0 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 6 | R+2.0 | R win 61.8% | R+11.0 to D+6.9 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 5 | R+2.1 | R win 61.8% | R+11.0 to D+6.9 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 4 | R+2.1 | R win 61.9% | R+11.0 to D+6.9 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 3 | R+2.1 | R win 62.1% | R+11.1 to D+6.9 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 2 | R+2.1 | R win 62.2% | R+11.1 to D+6.9 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 1 | R+2.1 | R win 62.2% | R+11.1 to D+6.9 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
The polls
Poll average D+3.1A poll’s weight halves every 60 days and grows with its sample. Each pollster counts once, at its best release. Every poll counts at its published margin, sponsored or not.In governor races the forecast then counts a poll sponsored by a party or campaign at full weight and moves its margin 2 points against that party, which puts the average it reads at D+3.0. It then applies a fitted correction of 2.5 points toward Republicans for governor races, measured from past polling error, before blending it with its other evidence.36 recorded polls · 33 in the poll average
| Fieldwork | Added | Pollster | Result | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| from 2026-10-23 | 3h ago | style="text-align:left;" (R) ↗ | D+8.0D 50% · R 42% | 800 LV |
| from 2026-10-21 | 8h ago | Suffolk University ↗ | D+4.0D 48% · R 44% | 500 LV |
| from 2026-10-16 | 1d ago | Echelon Insights ↗ | R+2.0D 45% · R 47% | 508 LV |
| from 2026-10-20 | 2d ago | RedBox Research (D) ↗ | D+4.0D 48% · R 44% | 2,998 LV |
| from 2026-10-01 | 6d ago | Verasight ↗ | D+0.8D 46.2% · R 45.4% | 531 LV |
| from 2026-10-15 | 7d ago | Beacon Research/Shaw & Company Research ↗ | D+2.0D 50% · R 48% | 1,592 LV |
| from 2026-10-09 | 7d ago | New River Strategies/GS Strategy Group ↗ | D+5.0D 49% · R 44% | 959 LV |
| from 2026-10-15 | Marist University ↗ | D+7.0D 50% · R 43% | 1,176 LV |
Explore each poll’s weight in the average
Poll average D+3.1
- Published result
- D+8.0
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.75 · 6.9% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 23 Oct–26 Oct
- Sample
- 800 LV
- Sponsor
- Republican sponsor · organization not listed
- Published result
- D+4.0
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.59 · 3.2% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 21 Oct–26 Oct
- Sample
- 500 LV
- Sponsor
- Not listed
- Published result
- R+2.0
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.58 · 4.9% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 16 Oct–23 Oct
- Sample
- 508 LV
- Sponsor
- Not listed
- Published result
- D+4.0
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.94 · 8.7% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 20 Oct–23 Oct
- Sample
- 2,998 LV
- Sponsor
- Democratic sponsor · organization not listed
- Published result
- D+0.8
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.57 · 5.2% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 1 Oct–20 Oct
- Sample
- 531 LV
- Sponsor
- Not listed
- Published result
- R+2.8
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.49 · 4.5% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 27 Sep–19 Oct
- Sample
- 400 LV
- Sponsor
- Not listed
- Published result
- D+2.0
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.90 · 8.3% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 15 Oct–19 Oct
- Sample
- 1,592 LV
- Sponsor
- Not listed
- Published result
- D+7.0
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.83 · 4.2% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 15 Oct–18 Oct
- Sample
- 1,176 LV
- Sponsor
- Not listed
How the margin was built
Tap an input for its calculation and source.
Displayed values are rounded.
All calculations & sources
How this state voted, 2024 −11.210 points
The state's presidential margin in 2024 as a share of all votes cast, from our own county sums — the same measurement the model's statewide terrain center is built from. Every pull below is measured from here, not from EVEN, which is why a landslide seat's listed pulls are small numbers and still land where the forecast does.
- 2024 presidential result for this state, as a share of all votes cast, from Call the Map's own county sums.
- Same source as Act I's 2024-president reference mark, so the origin lands on it.
Fitted model, above the terrain shown +5.636 points
What the fitted model adds on top of the starting terrain above — incumbency, past results, campaign finance and the other fitted terms — measured from that terrain rather than from EVEN. It is a comparison with the starting point already shown, not a separate input. The source detail lists the variables the fit uses.
- Fitted baseline -5.574 minus starting point -11.210 = 5.636 points.
- Fitted intercept: -6.136 points.
- 2010 White population share used by the frozen historical fit: observed input 82.605. -0.503 × ((82.605 − 77.922) / 12.864) = -0.183 points.
- gov_midterm_wh: observed input -1.000. -0.987 × ((-1.000 − 0.336) / 0.739) = 1.785 points.
- 2024 presidential lean relative to the national result: observed input -9.813. 4.163 × ((-9.813 − -4.415) / 20.258) = -1.109 points.
- Previous governor election margin: observed input -25.030. 1.755 × ((-25.030 − -3.131) / 19.227) = -1.999 points.
- gov_inc_running_signed: observed input 0.000. 2.531 × ((0.000 − -0.120) / 0.708) = 0.428 points.
- gov_inc_tenure_signed: observed input 0.000. 3.340 × ((0.000 − -0.143) / 0.902) = 0.529 points.
- The displayed arithmetic is rounded; the fitted terms use full precision. The intercept plus these five terms gives the non-ratings baseline.
- No source-verified current Gallup reading supports the former 40% / July 2026 claim. The current Gallup series ends in 2025; the Presidency Project identifies its 2026 observations as other pollsters. Use the unchanged fitted missing-value rule, not a replacement polling scale.
- Certified 2024 presidential baseline: state R+11.3, national R+1.5; subtracting the national margin gives relative lean −9.8. Source: FEC compilation of certified state results.
This race’s polls +4.121 points
What this race’s own recent polling adds beyond its prior. The forecast weights each poll for recency and sample size and counts each pollster once; the weights listed here are those of the polls’ own average.
- style="text-align:left;" (R) (2026-10-26, n=800): D+8.0 · weight 0.75 in the poll average
- Suffolk University (2026-10-26, n=500): D+4.0 · weight 0.59 in the poll average
- RedBox Research (D) (2026-10-23, n=2,998): D+4.0 · weight 0.94 in the poll average
- Echelon Insights (2026-10-23, n=508): R+2.0 · weight 0.58 in the poll average
- Verasight (2026-10-20, n=531): D+0.8 · weight 0.57 in the poll average
- Beacon Research/Shaw & Company Research (2026-10-19, n=1,592): D+2.0 · weight 0.90 in the poll average
- … and 30 more below.
- Poll average D+3.1, from 33 polls · 36 recorded polls. This is the polls’ own average, each poll at its published margin, the figure this page’s poll summary shows. In governor races the forecast then counts a poll sponsored by a party or campaign at full weight and moves its margin 2 points against that party, which puts the average it reads at D+3.0. It then applies a fitted correction of 2.5 points toward Republicans for governor races, measured from past polling error, before blending it with its other evidence. The forecast gives the polls 98% of the weight against its structural prior for this race, which moves the margin 4.1 points away from Republicans from where it stood before the polls. Eligible polls: latest poll: 2026-10-26 (2 days old).
National environment +1.838 points
The contribution to this race’s margin, not the national polling margin itself. The race’s loading, reference level and polling blend determine how much of the national climate reaches its final forecast.
- The national environment in this edition is D+8.4. This row is its contribution to the race’s prior, not a claim that the country is D+1.8.
- This step’s recorded contribution to the margin is +1.8.
- The elasticity is fitted on the pooled panel of contested governor races (2010–2024) with cycle-clustered standard errors; it is a measured response to the national environment, not a judgment floor.
Historical error calibration +0.824 points
A prior-election residual correction, when an admitted model publishes one.
- The forecast’s calibration against past governor results. The recorded contribution is +0.8.
Votes for other candidates −0.027 points
Every step above is measured between the two major-party candidates alone, as if nobody else were on the ballot. The forecast sets 2.2% of the vote aside for other candidates and write-ins, so as a share of every vote cast the gap between the two is smaller by that much. This step is exactly that: the two-party margin times the share going to other candidates. It is the same arithmetic that turns the two-party margin into the two shares printed at the top of the page.
The components this edition publishes for this race, in points. “Other factors” closes the sum to the two-party structural lean exactly. The margin the page prints is a share of every vote cast, so the “Votes for other candidates” row carries the exact difference between the two-party lean and that margin; with it, the walk sums to the printed margin exactly.
| Named factor | Contribution |
|---|---|
| FundamentalsThe admitted fitted baseline. Its surviving variables differ by office; the source detail above identifies those used for this race. | −5.57 |
| This race's pollsAdmitted head-to-head polls of this race, recency- and quality-weighted. | +4.12 |
| National environmentThe national environment’s contribution to the prior. Polling can attenuate its influence; this value is not the national polling margin. | +1.84 |
| Historical calibrationThe House lane's calibration against certified past cycles. | +0.82 |
| Other factors | 0.00 |
Where the votes are
The map of this race loads here.
Recent elections
| Election | Result | Votes cast |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 · Governor ↗ | R+25.0 | 4,134,877 |
| 2018 · Governor ↗ | R+3.7 | 4,435,820 |
| 2014 · Governor ↗ | R+30.6 | 3,055,913 |
| 2010 · Governor ↗ | R+2.0 | 3,852,469 |
Margins are the Democrat’s share of all votes cast minus the Republican’s.
Race context
- Turnout, 2018 midterm
- 50.2% 4,496,834 ballots
- Turnout, 2022 midterm
- 47.1% 4,201,368 ballots
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+11.3between the two parties
Turnout is ballots cast statewide as a share of the voting-eligible population. Source: University of Florida Election Lab ↗
Population profile
U.S. Census Bureau, 2022 American Community Survey 5-year estimates ↗
Coverage
5 stories · 10 quotes
- Ramaswamy's Attack on Amy Acton Was Bad Enough. Trump and Vance Made It Worse. ↗
Reason · Oct 28
- Voters say the Republican’s controversial spot weaponizing Dr. Amy Acton’s childhood rape and neglect will help Democrats win. ↗
Mother Jones · Official · 1h ago
curated newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match · election-topic match - There’s a new mailer in Ohioans’s mailboxes from the Progressive Families PAC, labeling Amy Acton as being against the LGBTQIA+ community.
@jimswift.bsky.social is looking into whether these mailers are actually coming from progressives. ↗
The Bulwark · Official · 2h ago
curated newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match - Suffolk University's Ohio poll for USA Today:
Senate: Sherrod Brown (D): 47, Jon Husted (R-inc): 44, all others 2% or less.
Governor: Amy Acton (D): 48, Vivek Ramaswamy (R): 44, Don Kissick (L): 4.
www.suffolk.edu/-/media/suff... ↗
The Downballot · Analysis · 7h ago
curated downballot newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match · election-topic match - Outside a rally in Dayton, Ohio this week, voters said they think Ramaswamy’s advertisement may actually help Ohio Democrats like Amy Acton best their Republican opponents in already-tight races. ↗
Mother Jones · Official · 13h ago
curated newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match · election-topic match - Vivek Ramaswamy’s Amy Acton ad makes a false – and sickening – argument | Moira Donegan ↗
The Guardian US politics · Oct 27
- Former President Obama poked fun at President Trump’s White House renovation projects on Saturday during a campaign stop in Cleveland, Ohio, where he was stumping for Democratic gubernatorial candidate Amy Acton and Senate candidate Sherrod Brown (D). ↗
The Hill · Official · 2d ago
curated national newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match - GOP Ohio gubernatorial candidate Vivek Ramaswamy tries to reframe controversial ad, claiming it wasn’t about child sex abuse amid protests. Via @ohiocapitaljournal.com ohiocapitaljournal.com/2026/10/25/r... ↗
Rhode Island Current · Official · 2d ago
curated state newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match
Forecast as of October 28, 2026: Call the Map currently has Amy Acton ahead of Vivek Ramaswamy by D+1.2, with a 58 in 100 chance to win. This is an open seat. That result would flip the seat to Democrats. The current poll average is D+3.1; 36 public polls are recorded.