Kansas · U.S. Senate
Open this race on The Map ↗Roger Marshall is favored to hold Kansas’s Senate seat. Predicted margin: R+8.1.
high / low: vote share (%) in the middle 80 in 100 simulations
About this field
Not competitive.
Forecast share averages the simulated vote. Win chance counts how often a candidate wins. A wider range of outcomes can give a candidate a higher win chance despite a lower average share.
Forecast history
Latest reading · Sep 13 · first published Sep 9 · 80% range · margin points R+17.9 to D+1.7. Methodology
Hover the line, tap it, or use the arrow keys to inspect its history.
About this series
This comparable series begins on September 9, 2026, when the model version changed to CTMM 2.2. Earlier readings remain in the archive and are not joined as voter movement; faded points before September 9, 2026 are reconstructions, not forecasts issued on those days.
Faded: CTMM 2.2 reconstructed history: computed after the fact with each date's available polls and environment, without expert ratings; not an issued forecast. Issued forecasts begin at the launch marker.
The polls
Ledger weighted average R+2.0Used by the forecast: 5 polls (60-day half-life) · measured R+4.6 · after the fitted poll-error shift R+6.15 recorded polls · 5 eligible for the aggregate · 5 with positive weight
| Fieldwork | Added | Pollster | Result | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| from 2026-09-08 | 1h ago | co/efficient ↗ | R+5.0D 44% · R 49% | 915 LV |
| from 2026-08-12 | Global Strategy Group ↗People Over Politics Action Fund | D+1.0D 44% · R 43% | 800 LV | |
| from 2026-08-07 | Public Policy Polling (D) ↗Senate Majority PAC | R+1.0D 45% · R 46% | 569 LV | |
| from 2026-07-08 | GBAO ↗ | R+4.0D 43% · R 47% | 600 LV | |
| from 2026-01-26 | Tavern Research ↗ | R+8.0D 46% · R 54% | 1,013 LV |
Explore poll adjustments
Ledger weighted average R+2.0
- Published result
- R+5.0
- Model read
- R+2.0
- Model weight
- 0.548
- Fieldwork
- 8 Sep–10 Sep
- Sample
- 915 LV
- Sponsor
- Not listed
- Pollster quality
- 0.490
- Admission
- Included in the model
Recorded corrections: sponsor −0.16 points; pollster +3.56 points.
The New York Times polling archive · first recorded by Call the Map 13 SepOpen poll source- Published result
- D+1.0
- Model read
- EVEN
- Model weight
- 0.204
- Fieldwork
- 12 Aug–16 Aug
- Sample
- 800 LV
- Sponsor
- People Over Politics Action Fund
- Pollster quality
- 0.445
- Admission
- Included in the model
Recorded corrections: sponsor −2.98 points; pollster −2.97 points.
The New York Times polling archive · first recorded by Call the Map 5 SepOpen poll source- Published result
- R+1.0
- Model read
- R+2.0
- Model weight
- 0.208
- Fieldwork
- 7 Aug–8 Aug
- Sample
- 569 LV
- Sponsor
- Senate Majority PAC
- Pollster quality
- 0.702
- Admission
- Included in the model
Recorded corrections: sponsor −2.98 points; pollster −0.99 points.
Wikipedia polling archive · first recorded by Call the Map 14 AugOpen poll source- Published result
- R+4.0
- Model read
- R+7.0
- Model weight
- 0.074
- Fieldwork
- 8 Jul–13 Jul
- Sample
- 600 LV
- Sponsor
- DEM sponsor · organization not listed
- Pollster quality
- 0.576
- Admission
- Included in the model
Recorded corrections: sponsor −2.98 points; pollster −1.83 points.
The New York Times polling archive · first recorded by Call the Map 19 AugOpen poll source- Published result
- R+8.0
- Model read
- R+8.2
- Model weight
- 0.000
- Fieldwork
- 26 Jan–28 Jan
- Sample
- 1,013 LV
- Sponsor
- Not listed
- Pollster quality
- 0.550
- Admission
- Included in the model
Recorded corrections: sponsor −0.16 points; pollster 0.00 points.
The New York Times polling archive · first recorded by Call the Map 19 AugOpen poll sourceHow the margin was built
Follow each contribution to the margin. Wider ribbons mean more percentage points. Tap an input for its calculation and source.
The signed totals combine at the forecast. Displayed values are rounded.
All calculations & sources
How this state voted, 2024 −16.120 points
The state's two-party presidential margin in 2024, from our own county sums — the same measurement the model's statewide terrain center is built from. Every pull below is measured from here, not from EVEN, which is why a landslide seat's listed pulls are small numbers and still land where the forecast does.
- 2024 presidential result for this state, two-party, from Call the Map's own county sums.
- Same source as Act I's 2024-president reference mark, so the origin lands on it.
This race’s polls +4.116 points
What this race’s own recent polling adds beyond its prior, after each poll is weighted for recency, sample size and pollster quality.
- 5 matchup-validated, sample/recency/grade-weighted poll(s), latest 2026-09-10
- Global Strategy Group (2026-08-16, n=800): D+1.0 · weight 0.49
- Public Policy Polling (D) (2026-08-08, n=569): R+1.0 · weight 0.32
- GBAO (2026-07-13, n=600): R+4.0 · weight 0.14
- Tavern Research (2026-01-28, n=1,013): R+8.0 · weight 0.00
- Adjusted poll-bank aggregate R+2.0 · 4 recorded polls · 4 eligible for the aggregate · 4 with positive weight. The sealed model records a net polling contribution of +4.1 D. Observation weights are not the final model blend weight. Eligible polls: latest poll: 2026-08-16 (28 days old).
- Adjusted poll-bank aggregate R+2.0 · 4 recorded polls · 4 eligible for the aggregate · 4 with positive weight; recorded polling contribution +4.1 D. These observation weights must not be read as the model’s final prior-versus-polling weight. Eligible polls: latest poll: 2026-08-16 (28 days old).
Fitted model, above the terrain shown +2.850 points
What the fitted model adds on top of the starting terrain above — incumbency, past results, campaign finance and the other fitted terms — measured from that terrain rather than from EVEN. It is a comparison with the starting point already shown, not a separate input. The source detail lists the variables the fit uses.
- Fitted baseline -13.270 minus starting point -16.120 = 2.850 points.
- For orientation, the presidential results here: 2024 R+16.1, 2020 R+14.8.
- The work: the −13.3 D fundamentals push is the sum of the dynamic formula's surviving variables for this race — each one's own contribution is listed below.
- fundamentals core = 25-term dynamic formula (mass fit over the master feature matrix, held-out-cycle validated; see matrix/feature_dictionary.md + mass_fit_report.json)
- 9-term formula, held-out validated.
National environment +1.988 points
The contribution to this race’s margin, not the national polling margin itself. The race’s loading, reference level and polling blend determine how much of the national climate reaches its final forecast.
- Three-source blend, updated 2026-09-08: 52% generic-ballot aggregates (D+6.5) · 28% special-election overperformance (D+9.0 across 46 specials) · 20% approval-implied (D+8.6 from net approval -21.7).
- Latest polls — generic ballot 2026-09-08 (5 days old), approval 2026-09-10 (3 days old).
- Generic-ballot average D+6.5 · support factor 0.84 (the share of that channel's capacity the admitted polls carry) — separate inputs; their product is a capacity diagnostic, not a margin.
- Weights are the 55/25/20 capacities scaled by each channel's evidence and renormalized, so thin polling widens the interval instead of pulling the center toward zero — 16% of the weight is carried that way.
- Blended national environment: D+7.6.
- Applied at full strength to this chamber's races.
- The work: national environment × 1 chamber strength = +2.0 D of this margin.
- Blended national environment: D+7.6 (updated 2026-09-08).
- Effective poll weight 84%; fundamentals share 16%, carried by the interval (×1.08) rather than by the center.
- The support factor is the share of the generic-ballot capacity the admitted polls carry; average × support is a capacity diagnostic, not a margin, and is not what the row above multiplies.
- Applied at full strength to this chamber: +2.0 of this margin.
Structural safeguards −0.950 points
Bounded corrections that keep the model consistent with structural facts.
- Applied only when a safe state's dynamic fundamentals point in the same direction as its strong presidential lean but are materially compressed toward zero.
- The 25% correction toward that lean improved safe-race MAE in strict expanding-window validation without changing a historical call.
- The disclosed adjustment is −0.9 D.
The components this edition publishes for this race, in points. “Other factors” closes the sum to the two-party structural lean exactly. Here the structural lean IS the published margin, so the walk sums to the projection exactly; nothing is left over.
| Named factor | Contribution |
|---|---|
| FundamentalsThe admitted fitted baseline. Its surviving variables differ by office; the source detail above identifies those used for this race. | −13.27 |
| This race's pollsAdmitted head-to-head polls of this race, recency- and quality-weighted. | +4.12 |
| National environmentThe national environment’s contribution to the prior. Polling can attenuate its influence; this value is not the national polling margin. | +1.99 |
| Structural terrain safeguardA bounded pull toward presidential terrain in heavily partisan states. | −0.95 |
| Other factors | 0.00 |
Recent elections
| Election | Result | Votes cast |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 · U.S. Senate ↗ | R+12.0 | 1,367,755 |
| 2014 · U.S. Senate ↗ | Not a D–R contestThe ballot was not a Democrat versus a Republican; a D/R margin cannot identify the winner. | 866,191 |
| 2008 · U.S. Senate ↗ | R+24.5 | 1,210,690 |
| 2002 · U.S. Senate ↗ | Not a D–R contestThe ballot was not a Democrat versus a Republican; a D/R margin cannot identify the winner. | 776,850 |
Margins compare Democratic and Republican vote totals. Nonstandard ballots are labeled separately.
The money
Adam Hamilton ↗
D$4.2Mraised
$1.7M cash on handFiling through 07/15/2026
Roger Marshall ↗
R$4.0Mraised
$5.4M cash on handFiling through 07/15/2026
Bar length compares reported receipts in this race; the tick marks cash on hand. A missing filing stays blank rather than becoming $0.
One more fundraising reportCall the Map · $0
The candidates are comfortably out-fundraising the website covering them. A little rude, perhaps, but statistically unsurprising.
- Received so far
- $0
- Measured compute
- $26,188.58
Ko-fi and Buy Me a Coffee receipts are counted through Sep 1, 2026. Measured compute prices model runs at standard published API rates; it is not what I paid. Hosting, data and subscriptions, the domain and my own time are not counted. Donations buy gratitude, never a forecast adjustment.
Outside spending
Support + opposition · separate from receiptsFor and against Adam Hamilton$1.4M
1 spending group
| Group | For | Against |
|---|---|---|
| MAIN STREET FUND | $0 | $1.4M |
For and against Roger Marshall$1.1M
3 spending groups
| Group | For | Against |
|---|---|---|
| PEOPLE OVER POLITICS ACTION FUND | $0 | $842K |
| SENATE CONSERVATIVES FUND | $215K | $0 |
| SENATE CONSERVATIVES ACTION | $46K | $0 |
Includes primary spending. Opposition is recorded against its named target; no benefit to another candidate is assumed.
$2.2M in outside spending on earlier candidates.
FEC filings · through 07/15/2026 · Definitions & method
Race context
- Forecast votes cast
- 979,150
- Forecast turnout
- 46.0% of the voting-eligible population
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+16.4
Statewide, 46.9% of the voting-eligible population is projected to cast a ballot; the lower figure above is the share projected to vote in this race.
Population profile Select a measure for its source and denominator
U.S. Census Bureau, 2022 American Community Survey 5-year estimates ↗
Coverage
1 story · 6 quotes
- I have seen it all: A UMC pastor leading a Wizard of Oz-themed call-and-response with the crowd during a Senate debate at the Kansas State Fair.
Democratic nominee Adam Hamilton has the juice ↗
Alex Ip 葉清霖 · Official · 17h ago
curated newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match - Via @anna-writes.bsky.social: Incumbent Republican U.S. Sen. Roger Marshall and the Rev. Adam Hamilton, a Democrat, confronted a raucous crowd Saturday defending their stances on tariffs, the war in Iran and partisan politics. #ksleg kansasreflector.com/2026/09/12/c... ↗
Sherman Smith, Kansas Reflector editor in chief · Commentary · 23h ago
curated political commentary · recent Bluesky post · named-race match - Kansas State Fair debate: Republican U.S. Sen. Roger Marshall and Democratic pastor Adam Hamilton respond to a question about their residency in and outside of Kansas. #ksleg ↗
Sherman Smith, Kansas Reflector editor in chief · Commentary · 1d ago
curated political commentary · recent Bluesky post · named-race match - Kansas governor and U.S. Senate candidates to clash at state fair debates | via @crazeywriter.bsky.social #ksleg ↗
Kansas Reflector · Official · 2d ago
curated state newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match - Opinion editor @claywires.bsky.social writes: Roger Marshall’s glass jaw shatters as string of embarrassing stories wallop Kansas senator #ksleg ↗
Kansas Reflector · Official · 3d ago
curated state newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match - Kansas Sens. Jerry Moran (R) and Roger Marshall (R) are defending private jet maker Bombardier from growing pressure from President Trump, who on Monday declared the Canadian aerospace company would no longer be able to sell planes in the United States. ↗
The Hill · Official · 5d ago
curated national newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match - Kansas has not elected a Democrat to the US Senate since 1932. Will that change in November? ↗
The Guardian US politics · Aug 25