Call
the Map
Forecast6 days out
← GovernorsNovember 3, 2026

Kansas · Governor

Ty Masterson is heavily favored to flip the Kansas governorship. Predicted margin: R+6.8.

Cindy Holscher (D)15 in 10045.040.9–49.2
Ty Masterson (R)85 in 10051.847.6–55.9

Under each share, its likely range (80 in 100 simulations)

Background

Kelly is term-limited: Cindy Holscher (D) faces Ty Masterson (R).

Likely ROpen seat

Forecast history

Steady0.0 pts · Oct 26 → Oct 28Kansas Governor: steady — the published margin moved 0.0 points between the Oct 26 and Oct 28 editions (3 of 47 stored editions). This is movement of the published forecast between editions.
EVENR+5Aug 1Nov 3 · Election Day

Latest reading · Oct 28 · first published Sep 9 · 80% range · margin points R+15.1 to D+1.6. Methodology

 

About this series

Reconstructed with the current model Aug 1 – Sep 8 and Sep 16 – Sep 18; published readings Sep 9 – Oct 28. Each reconstructed day is the current model on that day’s own inputs, not a forecast published then. Corrections are dated in the changelog.

Faded: CTMM 2.2 reconstructed history: computed after the fact with each date's available polls and environment, without expert ratings; not an issued forecast. Issued forecasts begin at the launch marker.

CTMM 2.2 readings for 2026-09-16, 2026-09-17, 2026-09-18 were computed after the fact with each day's available inputs: no edition was issued on those days. Not an issued forecast.

Data table
DateMarginChance80% rangeReading
Oct 28R+6.8R win 84.8%R+15.1 to D+1.6Published forecast
Oct 27R+6.7R win 84.8%R+15.0 to D+1.6Published forecast
Oct 26R+6.7R win 84.7%R+15.0 to D+1.7Published forecast
Oct 25R+6.7R win 84.6%R+15.0 to D+1.7Published forecast
Oct 24R+6.6R win 84.5%R+15.0 to D+1.7Published forecast
Oct 23R+6.6R win 84.4%R+15.0 to D+1.7Published forecast
Oct 22R+6.6R win 84.3%R+15.0 to D+1.8Published forecast
Oct 21R+6.6R win 84.2%R+14.9 to D+1.8Published forecast
Oct 20R+6.5R win 84.2%R+14.8 to D+1.7Published forecast
Oct 19R+6.5R win 84.2%R+14.8 to D+1.8Published forecast
Oct 18R+6.5R win 84.1%R+14.8 to D+1.8Published forecast
Oct 17R+6.5R win 84.0%R+14.7 to D+1.8Published forecast
Oct 16R+6.5R win 84.1%R+14.7 to D+1.8Published forecast
Oct 15R+6.4R win 84.1%R+14.7 to D+1.8Published forecast
Oct 14R+6.4R win 84.0%R+14.7 to D+1.9Published forecast
Oct 13R+6.4R win 83.9%R+14.7 to D+1.9Published forecast
Oct 12R+6.4R win 83.8%R+14.6 to D+1.9Published forecast
Oct 11R+6.4R win 83.8%R+14.6 to D+1.9Published forecast
Oct 10R+6.3R win 83.7%R+14.6 to D+1.9Published forecast
Oct 9R+6.3R win 83.7%R+14.6 to D+1.9Published forecast
Oct 8R+6.3R win 83.6%R+14.6 to D+2.0Published forecast
Oct 7R+6.3R win 83.6%R+14.5 to D+2.0Published forecast
Oct 6R+6.7R win 84.7%R+15.1 to D+1.7Published forecast
Oct 5R+6.7R win 84.6%R+15.1 to D+1.8Published forecast
Oct 4R+6.8R win 85.2%R+15.3 to D+1.6Published forecast
Oct 3R+6.8R win 84.4%R+15.3 to D+1.8Published forecast
Oct 2R+6.7R win 84.3%R+15.3 to D+1.8Published forecast
Oct 1R+7.5R win 86.8%R+16.1 to D+1.1Published forecast
Sep 30R+7.5R win 86.8%R+16.1 to D+1.2Published forecast
Sep 29R+7.5R win 86.7%R+16.1 to D+1.2Published forecast
Sep 28R+7.4R win 86.3%R+16.1 to D+1.2Published forecast
Sep 27R+7.4R win 86.3%R+16.0 to D+1.2Published forecast
Sep 26R+7.4R win 86.3%R+16.0 to D+1.2Published forecast
Sep 25R+7.4R win 86.0%R+16.0 to D+1.3Published forecast
Sep 24R+7.9R win 87.4%R+16.7 to D+0.9Published forecast
Sep 23R+7.8R win 87.3%R+16.6 to D+1.0Published forecast
Sep 22R+7.8R win 87.2%R+16.6 to D+1.0Published forecast
Sep 21R+7.8R win 87.2%R+16.6 to D+1.0Published forecast
Sep 20R+7.8R win 86.9%R+16.6 to D+1.0Published forecast
Sep 19R+7.7R win 87.1%R+16.5 to D+1.1Published forecast
Sep 18R+7.7R win 86.8%R+16.5 to D+1.1Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 17R+7.0R win 83.7%R+16.0 to D+2.1Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 16R+7.0R win 83.8%R+16.0 to D+2.1Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 15R+6.9R win 84.0%R+16.0 to D+2.1Published forecast
Sep 14R+6.9R win 83.8%R+16.0 to D+2.1Published forecast
Sep 13R+6.9R win 83.6%R+16.0 to D+2.1Published forecast
Sep 12R+6.9R win 83.6%R+15.9 to D+2.2Published forecast
Sep 11R+2.8R win 65.1%R+12.2 to D+6.7Published forecast
Sep 10R+2.8R win 65.1%R+12.3 to D+6.6Published forecast
Sep 9R+3.0R win 65.5%R+12.4 to D+6.5Published forecast
Sep 8R+2.8R win 65.2%R+12.3 to D+6.6Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 7R+2.8R win 65.2%R+12.3 to D+6.6Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 6R+2.8R win 65.2%R+12.3 to D+6.6Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 5R+2.8R win 65.2%R+12.3 to D+6.6Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 4R+2.8R win 65.2%R+12.3 to D+6.6Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 3R+2.8R win 65.2%R+12.3 to D+6.6Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 2R+2.8R win 65.2%R+12.3 to D+6.6Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 1R+2.8R win 65.1%R+12.3 to D+6.7Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 31R+2.8R win 65.1%R+12.3 to D+6.7Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 30R+2.8R win 65.1%R+12.3 to D+6.7Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 29R+2.8R win 65.0%R+12.3 to D+6.7Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 28R+2.8R win 65.1%R+12.3 to D+6.7Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 27R+1.6R win 57.9%R+11.6 to D+8.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 26R+1.7R win 58.1%R+11.7 to D+8.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 25R+1.6R win 58.0%R+11.7 to D+8.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 24R+1.6R win 58.0%R+11.7 to D+8.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 23R+1.6R win 58.0%R+11.7 to D+8.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 22R+1.6R win 58.0%R+11.7 to D+8.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 21R+1.7R win 58.5%R+11.7 to D+8.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 20R+1.7R win 58.4%R+11.7 to D+8.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 19R+1.6R win 58.3%R+11.7 to D+8.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 18R+1.6R win 58.3%R+11.7 to D+8.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 17R+1.7R win 58.3%R+11.7 to D+8.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 16R+1.7R win 58.4%R+11.7 to D+8.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 15R+1.6R win 58.2%R+11.7 to D+8.5Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 14R+1.7R win 58.5%R+11.8 to D+8.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 13R+1.7R win 58.6%R+11.8 to D+8.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 12R+1.7R win 58.5%R+11.8 to D+8.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 11R+1.7R win 58.5%R+11.8 to D+8.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 10R+1.7R win 58.5%R+11.8 to D+8.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 9R+1.7R win 58.5%R+11.8 to D+8.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 8R+1.7R win 58.5%R+11.8 to D+8.5Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 7R+1.7R win 58.5%R+11.9 to D+8.5Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 6R+1.8R win 58.9%R+12.0 to D+8.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 5R+1.8R win 59.0%R+12.0 to D+8.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 4R+1.8R win 58.9%R+12.0 to D+8.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 3R+1.8R win 59.0%R+12.0 to D+8.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 2R+1.8R win 59.0%R+12.0 to D+8.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 1R+1.8R win 59.0%R+12.0 to D+8.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs

The polls

Poll average R+3.8A poll’s weight halves every 60 days and grows with its sample. Each pollster counts once, at its best release. Every poll counts at its published margin, sponsored or not.In governor races the forecast then counts a poll sponsored by a party or campaign at full weight and moves its margin 2 points against that party, which puts the average it reads at R+4.3. It then applies a fitted correction of 2.5 points toward Republicans for governor races, measured from past polling error, before blending it with its other evidence.7 recorded polls · 7 in the poll average

FieldworkAddedPollsterResultSample
from 2026-10-185d agoGlobal Strategy Group ↗EVEND 47% · R 47%600 LV
from 2026-09-24YouGov ↗R+3.0D 44% · R 47%2,252 LV
from 2026-09-22The New York Times/Siena University ↗R+4.1D 44.38% · R 48.52%605 LV
from 2026-09-13Global Strategy Group ↗Democratic Attorneys General AssociationD+3.0D 49% · R 46%800 LV
from 2026-09-15Emerson College ↗NexstarR+7.3D 43.48% · R 50.82%750 LV
from 2026-09-08co/efficient ↗R+8.0D 43% · R 51%915 LV
from 2026-08-13Global Strategy Group ↗D+1.0D 47% · R 46%600 LV
Explore each poll’s weight in the average

7 of 7 matching · 7 total

Poll average R+3.8

Global Strategy Group21 Oct · 600 LV · added 24 Oct
YouGov4 Oct · 2,252 LV · added 7 Oct
The New York Times/Siena University30 Sep · 605 LV · added 4 Oct
Emerson College16 Sep · 750 LV · added 19 Sep
Global Strategy Group16 Sep · 800 LV · added 1 Oct
co/efficient10 Sep · 915 LV · added 13 Sep
Global Strategy Group16 Aug · 600 LV · added 30 Aug
Explore all 7 polls for this race

How the margin was built

Tap an input for its calculation and source.

Toward D+15.2
Toward R−21.9
Forecast marginR+6.8

Displayed values are rounded.

All calculations & sources

How this state voted, 2024 −16.120 points

The state's presidential margin in 2024 as a share of all votes cast, from our own county sums — the same measurement the model's statewide terrain center is built from. Every pull below is measured from here, not from EVEN, which is why a landslide seat's listed pulls are small numbers and still land where the forecast does.

  • 2024 presidential result for this state, as a share of all votes cast, from Call the Map's own county sums.
  • Same source as Act I's 2024-president reference mark, so the origin lands on it.

Fitted model, above the terrain shown +13.168 points

What the fitted model adds on top of the starting terrain above — incumbency, past results, campaign finance and the other fitted terms — measured from that terrain rather than from EVEN. It is a comparison with the starting point already shown, not a separate input. The source detail lists the variables the fit uses.

  • Fitted baseline -2.952 minus starting point -16.120 = 13.168 points.
  • Fitted intercept: -6.136 points.
  • 2010 White population share used by the frozen historical fit: observed input 83.645. -0.503 × ((83.645 − 77.922) / 12.864) = -0.224 points.
  • gov_midterm_wh: observed input -1.000. -0.987 × ((-1.000 − 0.336) / 0.739) = 1.785 points.
  • 2024 presidential lean relative to the national result: observed input -14.911. 4.163 × ((-14.911 − -4.415) / 20.258) = -2.157 points.
  • Previous governor election margin: observed input 2.210. 1.755 × ((2.210 − -3.131) / 19.227) = 0.488 points.
  • gov_inc_running_signed: observed input 0.000. 2.531 × ((0.000 − -0.120) / 0.708) = 0.428 points.
  • gov_inc_tenure_signed: observed input 0.000. 3.340 × ((0.000 − -0.143) / 0.902) = 0.529 points.
  • The displayed arithmetic is rounded; the fitted terms use full precision. The intercept plus these five terms gives the non-ratings baseline.
  • No source-verified current Gallup reading supports the former 40% / July 2026 claim. The current Gallup series ends in 2025; the Presidency Project identifies its 2026 observations as other pollsters. Use the unchanged fitted missing-value rule, not a replacement polling scale.
  • Certified 2024 presidential baseline: state R+16.4, national R+1.5; subtracting the national margin gives relative lean −14.9. Source: FEC compilation of certified state results.

National environment +1.832 points

The contribution to this race’s margin, not the national polling margin itself. The race’s loading, reference level and polling blend determine how much of the national climate reaches its final forecast.

  • The national environment in this edition is D+8.4. This row is its contribution to the race’s prior, not a claim that the country is D+1.8.
  • This step’s recorded contribution to the margin is +1.8.
  • The elasticity is fitted on the pooled panel of contested governor races (2010–2024) with cycle-clustered standard errors; it is a measured response to the national environment, not a judgment floor.

This race’s polls −5.560 points

What this race’s own recent polling adds beyond its prior. The forecast weights each poll for recency and sample size and counts each pollster once; the weights listed here are those of the polls’ own average.

  • Global Strategy Group (2026-10-21, n=600): ±0.0 · weight 0.61 in the poll average
  • YouGov (2026-10-04, n=2,252): R+3.0 · weight 0.76 in the poll average
  • The New York Times/Siena University (2026-09-30, n=605): R+4.1 · weight 0.48 in the poll average
  • Emerson College (2026-09-16, n=750): R+7.3 · weight 0.46 in the poll average
  • Global Strategy Group (2026-09-16, n=800): D+3.0 · weight 0.47 in the poll average
  • co/efficient (2026-09-10, n=915): R+8.0 · weight 0.47 in the poll average
  • … and 1 more below.
  • Poll average R+3.8, from 7 polls · 7 recorded polls. This is the polls’ own average, each poll at its published margin, the figure this page’s poll summary shows. In governor races the forecast then counts a poll sponsored by a party or campaign at full weight and moves its margin 2 points against that party, which puts the average it reads at R+4.3. It then applies a fitted correction of 2.5 points toward Republicans for governor races, measured from past polling error, before blending it with its other evidence. The forecast gives the polls 98% of the weight against its structural prior for this race, which moves the margin 5.6 points toward Republicans from where it stood before the polls. Eligible polls: latest poll: 2026-10-21 (7 days old).

Historical error calibration −0.266 points

A prior-election residual correction, when an admitted model publishes one.

  • The forecast’s calibration against past governor results. The recorded contribution is −0.3.

Votes for other candidates +0.224 points

Every step above is measured between the two major-party candidates alone, as if nobody else were on the ballot. The forecast sets 3.2% of the vote aside for other candidates and write-ins, so as a share of every vote cast the gap between the two is smaller by that much. This step is exactly that: the two-party margin times the share going to other candidates. It is the same arithmetic that turns the two-party margin into the two shares printed at the top of the page.

The components this edition publishes for this race, in points. “Other factors” closes the sum to the two-party structural lean exactly. The margin the page prints is a share of every vote cast, so the “Votes for other candidates” row carries the exact difference between the two-party lean and that margin; with it, the walk sums to the printed margin exactly.

Named factorContribution
This race's pollsAdmitted head-to-head polls of this race, recency- and quality-weighted.−5.56
FundamentalsThe admitted fitted baseline. Its surviving variables differ by office; the source detail above identifies those used for this race.−2.95
National environmentThe national environment’s contribution to the prior. Polling can attenuate its influence; this value is not the national polling margin.+1.83
Historical calibrationThe House lane's calibration against certified past cycles.−0.27
Other factors0.00

Where the votes are

The map of this race loads here.

Recent elections

ElectionResultVotes cast
2022 · Governor ↗D+2.21,008,998
2018 · Governor ↗D+5.01,055,566
2014 · Governor ↗R+3.7869,502
2010 · Governor ↗R+31.1838,790

Margins are the Democrat’s share of all votes cast minus the Republican’s.

Race context

Turnout, 2018 midterm
49.8% 1,060,000 ballots
Turnout, 2022 midterm
47.6% 1,008,998 ballots
2024 presidential margin
R+16.4between the two parties

Turnout is ballots cast statewide as a share of the voting-eligible population. Source: University of Florida Election Lab ↗

Population profile

White alone · 79.8%2,341,473 of 2,935,922 · Residents2022 Census · matched race geography

Coverage

Forecast as of October 28, 2026: Call the Map currently has Ty Masterson ahead of Cindy Holscher by R+6.8, with an 85 in 100 chance to win. This is an open seat. That result would flip the seat to Republicans. The current poll average is R+3.8; 7 public polls are recorded.