Mike Lawler 41% · Kathy Hochul 48%
- Field dates
- May 7–May 9, 2025
- Sample
- 600 LV
- Sponsor / client
- Not reported in archive
- Partisan sponsorship
- No partisan sponsorship flag
Historical accuracy is measured against certified results. Current-cycle records come from the canonical, deduplicated archive and do not by themselves change the sealed forecast.
11 eligible historical polls across 5 represented cycles passed the published history identity checks. Historical bias is descriptive and is kept separate from sponsor or client affiliation.
Archive source date 2026-09-09 · bundled copy. Archive records may be newer than the sealed forecast; inclusion here does not mean the forecast uses them.
8 shown · 20 total
Mike Lawler 41% · Kathy Hochul 48%
Roy Cooper 51.5% · Michael Whatley 39%
Roy Cooper 49.8% · Michael Whatley 38.7%
Roy Cooper 48.9% · Michael Whatley 41.1%
Roy Cooper 47% · Michael Whatley 39%
Roy Cooper 48.1% · Don Brown 38%
Roy Cooper 46% · Michael Whatley 42%
Roy Cooper 47.3% · Michael Whatley 39.1%
11 shown · 11 total
| Cycle | Race | Type | Field end | Sample | Poll | Result | Error |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2020_Sen-G_NC | Sen-G | 2020-10-24 | 504 | D+3.0 | R+1.8 | D+4.8 |
| 2020 | 2020_Pres-G_NC | Pres-G | 2020-10-24 | 504 | D+1.0 | R+1.4 | D+2.4 |
| 2020 | 2020_Gov-G_NC | Gov-G | 2020-10-24 | 504 | D+10.0 | D+4.5 | D+5.5 |
| 2016 | 2016_Sen-G_PA | Sen-G | 2016-11-03 | 504 | 0 | R+1.4 | D+1.4 |
| 2016 | 2016_Pres-G_PA | Pres-G | 2016-11-03 | 504 | 0 | R+0.7 | D+0.7 |
| 2015 | 2015_Gov-O_LA | Gov-G | 2015-10-17 | 612 | D+10.0 | D+16.9 | R+6.9 |
| 2014 | 2014_Sen-G_NC | Sen-G | 2014-10-29 | 511 | R+2.5 | R+1.6 | R+0.9 |
| 2014 | 2014_House-G_NY-21 | House-G | 2014-10-28 | 560 | R+14.0 | R+21.3 | D+7.3 |
| 2014 | 2014_Gov-G_PA | Gov-G | 2014-10-27 | 680 | D+10.0 | D+9.9 | D+0.1 |
| 2013 | 2013_Sen-GS_NJ | Sen-G | 2013-10-14 | 778 | D+11.0 | D+10.9 | D+0.1 |
| 2013 | 2013_Sen-GS_MA | Sen-G | 2013-06-11 | 498 | D+12.0 | D+10.2 | D+1.8 |
1 further row is held in this pollster’s history shard as within-party or nonpartisan contests (Prim). Those carry no D/R orientation, so they are excluded from the error, bias and coverage figures above and from the table.
Method · historical final-three-week D/R general-election rows plus verified historical supplement; min n=5
Definition · bias_D is poll D-R margin minus actual D-R margin; positive overstates Democrats.
A missing sample, sponsor or source is labeled unavailable; it is never reconstructed.
Poll data via VoteHub, used under CC BY 4.0. Poll data from The New York Times, used under CC BY 4.0.