Call
the Map
Forecast6 days out
← HouseNovember 3, 2026

VA-01 · U.S. House

Shannon Taylor and Rob Wittman are in a dead heat — the modeled margin rounds to even.

Shannon Taylor (D)51 in 10049.746.4–53.0
Rob Wittman incumbent (R)49 in 10049.746.4–52.9

Under each share, its likely range (80 in 100 simulations) · * incumbent

Toss-upRepublican-held seat

Forecast history

Steady+0.1 pts · Oct 26 → Oct 28VA-01 U.S. House: steady — the published margin moved +0.1 points between the Oct 26 and Oct 28 editions (3 of 47 stored editions). This is movement of the published forecast between editions.
EVENR+5Aug 1Nov 3 · Election Day

Latest reading · Oct 28 · first published Sep 9 · 80% range · margin points R+6.5 to D+6.6. Methodology

 

About this series

Reconstructed with the current model Aug 1 – Sep 8 and Sep 16 – Sep 18; published readings Sep 9 – Oct 28. Each reconstructed day is the current model on that day’s own inputs, not a forecast published then. Corrections are dated in the changelog.

Faded: CTMM 2.2 reconstructed history: computed after the fact with each date's available polls and environment, without expert ratings; not an issued forecast. Issued forecasts begin at the launch marker.

CTMM 2.2 readings for 2026-09-16, 2026-09-17, 2026-09-18 were computed after the fact with each day's available inputs: no edition was issued on those days. Not an issued forecast.

Data table
DateMarginChance80% rangeReading
Oct 28EVEND win 50.5%R+6.5 to D+6.6Published forecast
Oct 27EVENR win 50.0%R+6.6 to D+6.6Published forecast
Oct 26EVENR win 50.0%R+6.6 to D+6.6Published forecast
Oct 25EVENR win 50.0%R+6.6 to D+6.6Published forecast
Oct 24EVENR win 50.0%R+6.6 to D+6.6Published forecast
Oct 23D+0.5D win 54.3%R+6.3 to D+7.4Published forecast
Oct 22D+0.5D win 54.3%R+6.3 to D+7.4Published forecast
Oct 21D+0.6D win 54.3%R+6.3 to D+7.4Published forecast
Oct 20D+0.5D win 54.3%R+6.3 to D+7.4Published forecast
Oct 19D+0.5D win 54.3%R+6.3 to D+7.4Published forecast
Oct 18D+0.5D win 54.3%R+6.3 to D+7.4Published forecast
Oct 17D+0.5D win 54.3%R+6.3 to D+7.4Published forecast
Oct 16D+0.5D win 54.3%R+6.3 to D+7.4Published forecast
Oct 15D+0.5D win 54.2%R+6.3 to D+7.4Published forecast
Oct 14D+0.5D win 54.2%R+6.3 to D+7.4Published forecast
Oct 13D+0.5D win 54.2%R+6.3 to D+7.4Published forecast
Oct 12D+0.5D win 54.3%R+6.3 to D+7.4Published forecast
Oct 11D+0.5D win 54.3%R+6.3 to D+7.4Published forecast
Oct 10D+0.5D win 54.3%R+6.3 to D+7.4Published forecast
Oct 9D+0.5D win 54.3%R+6.3 to D+7.4Published forecast
Oct 8D+0.5D win 54.3%R+6.3 to D+7.4Published forecast
Oct 7D+0.5D win 54.3%R+6.3 to D+7.4Published forecast
Oct 6D+0.5D win 54.2%R+6.3 to D+7.4Published forecast
Oct 5D+0.5D win 53.9%R+6.3 to D+7.4Published forecast
Oct 4D+0.5D win 54.1%R+6.3 to D+7.4Published forecast
Oct 3D+0.5D win 54.0%R+6.3 to D+7.4Published forecast
Oct 2D+0.5D win 54.0%R+6.3 to D+7.4Published forecast
Oct 1R+2.4R win 67.6%R+9.5 to D+4.7Published forecast
Sep 30R+2.4R win 67.1%R+9.5 to D+4.7Published forecast
Sep 29R+2.4R win 67.2%R+9.5 to D+4.7Published forecast
Sep 28R+2.4R win 67.3%R+9.5 to D+4.7Published forecast
Sep 27R+2.4R win 67.2%R+9.6 to D+4.7Published forecast
Sep 26R+2.4R win 67.2%R+9.6 to D+4.7Published forecast
Sep 25R+2.4R win 67.5%R+9.6 to D+4.7Published forecast
Sep 24R+2.5R win 67.5%R+9.6 to D+4.7Published forecast
Sep 23R+2.5R win 67.5%R+9.6 to D+4.7Published forecast
Sep 22R+1.3R win 59.0%R+8.8 to D+6.3Published forecast
Sep 21R+1.3R win 59.0%R+8.8 to D+6.3Published forecast
Sep 20R+1.3R win 58.8%R+8.8 to D+6.3Published forecast
Sep 19R+1.3R win 59.0%R+8.8 to D+6.2Published forecast
Sep 18R+1.2R win 57.7%R+8.7 to D+6.3Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 17R+1.2R win 57.7%R+8.8 to D+6.3Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 16R+1.3R win 57.9%R+8.8 to D+6.3Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 15R+1.4R win 59.6%R+8.9 to D+6.2Published forecast
Sep 14R+1.3R win 59.4%R+8.9 to D+6.2Published forecast
Sep 13R+1.4R win 59.1%R+8.9 to D+6.2Published forecast
Sep 12R+1.4R win 59.2%R+8.9 to D+6.2Published forecast
Sep 11R+1.4R win 59.9%R+9.0 to D+6.2Published forecast
Sep 10R+1.5R win 59.8%R+9.0 to D+6.1Published forecast
Sep 9R+1.5R win 60.0%R+9.0 to D+6.1Published forecast
Sep 8R+1.5R win 59.6%R+9.1 to D+6.1Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 7R+1.6R win 59.9%R+9.1 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 6R+1.6R win 59.9%R+9.1 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 5R+1.6R win 59.9%R+9.2 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 4R+1.6R win 60.0%R+9.2 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 3R+1.6R win 60.1%R+9.2 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 2R+1.6R win 60.1%R+9.2 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 1R+1.6R win 60.3%R+9.2 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 31R+1.6R win 60.2%R+9.2 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 30R+1.6R win 60.3%R+9.2 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 29R+1.6R win 60.1%R+9.2 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 28R+1.6R win 60.3%R+9.3 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 27R+1.6R win 60.3%R+9.2 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 26R+1.7R win 60.4%R+9.3 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 25R+1.6R win 60.3%R+9.3 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 24R+1.6R win 60.4%R+9.3 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 23R+1.6R win 60.4%R+9.3 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 22R+1.7R win 60.4%R+9.3 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 21R+1.7R win 61.9%R+9.3 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 20R+1.7R win 61.9%R+9.3 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 19R+1.7R win 61.9%R+9.3 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 18R+1.7R win 61.9%R+9.3 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 17R+1.7R win 61.9%R+9.3 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 16R+1.7R win 61.9%R+9.3 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 15R+1.7R win 61.8%R+9.3 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 14R+1.7R win 62.1%R+9.4 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 13R+1.7R win 62.1%R+9.4 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 12R+1.7R win 62.0%R+9.4 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 11R+1.7R win 62.1%R+9.4 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 10R+1.7R win 62.1%R+9.4 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 9R+1.7R win 62.0%R+9.4 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 8R+1.7R win 62.1%R+9.4 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 7R+1.7R win 62.1%R+9.4 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 6R+1.8R win 62.6%R+9.5 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 5R+1.8R win 62.6%R+9.5 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 4R+1.7R win 62.2%R+9.5 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 3R+1.7R win 62.3%R+9.5 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 2R+1.7R win 62.3%R+9.5 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 1R+1.7R win 62.3%R+9.5 to D+6.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs

The polls

Poll average D+1.5A poll’s weight halves every 60 days and grows with its sample. Each pollster counts once, at its best release. Every poll counts at its published margin, sponsored or not.In House races the forecast then counts a poll sponsored by a party or campaign at full weight and moves its margin 2 points against that party, which puts the average it reads at D+0.1.6 recorded polls · 5 in the poll average

FieldworkAddedPollsterResultSample
from 2026-10-241d agoDCCC Targeting Team ↗D+1.0D 48% · R 47%478 LV
from 2026-10-215d agoPublic Policy Polling ↗D+1.0D 47% · R 46%570 LV
from 2026-09-23The Washington Post/George Mason University Schar School of Policy and Government ↗D+4.0D 50% · R 46%609 LV
from 2026-09-15DCCC Targeting Team ↗R+1.0D 46% · R 47%519 LV
from 2026-03-10Ragnar Research Partners ↗Conservatives for AmericaR+4.0D 42% · R 46%400 LV
from 2025-08-08Public Policy Polling ↗House Majority PACDisplay-only · excluded from aggregateR+1.0D 40% · R 41%541 RV
Explore each poll’s weight in the average

6 of 6 matching · 6 total

Poll average D+1.5

DCCC Targeting Team25 Oct · 478 LV · added 28 Oct
Public Policy Polling22 Oct · 570 LV · added 23 Oct
The Washington Post/George Mason University Schar School of Policy and Government28 Sep · 609 LV · added 1 Oct
DCCC Targeting Team17 Sep · 519 LV · added 22 Sep
Ragnar Research Partners12 Mar · 400 LV · added 1 Sep
Public Policy Polling9 Aug · 541 RV · added 1 Sep
Explore all 6 polls for this race

How the margin was built

Tap an input for its calculation and source.

Toward D+4.8
Toward R−4.7
Forecast marginEVEN

Displayed values are rounded.

All calculations & sources

This district's measured terrain −4.732 points

Call the Map's partisan lean on the CURRENT district lines, before any current-cycle evidence. Every pull below is measured from here — not from EVEN.

  • Call the Map partisan lean, district geography bound to this forecast edition.
  • Prior source: observed_unchanged_lines.

Fitted model, above the terrain shown +2.236 points

What the fitted model adds on top of the starting terrain above — incumbency, past results, campaign finance and the other fitted terms — measured from that terrain rather than from EVEN. It is a comparison with the starting point already shown, not a separate input. The source detail lists the variables the fit uses.

  • Fitted baseline -2.496 minus starting point -4.732 = 2.236 points.
  • One fitted structural total; this edition does not split it into partisan lean and incumbency.
  • Fundamentals: −2.5 — the district's structural lean before this year's polling, money and candidate quality are added.
  • This edition publishes that as one fitted total. It does not break it into a partisan-lean and an incumbency term, so this page does not invent that split.
  • fundamentals core = 25-term dynamic formula (mass fit over the master feature matrix, held-out-cycle validated; see matrix/feature_dictionary.md + mass_fit_report.json)
  • 40-term formula, held-out validated.

National environment +2.071 points

The contribution to this race’s margin, not the national polling margin itself. The race’s loading, reference level and polling blend determine how much of the national climate reaches its final forecast.

  • Three-source blend, updated 2026-10-14: 53% generic-ballot aggregates (D+7.7) · 28% special-election overperformance (D+9.0 across 46 specials) · 20% approval-implied (D+9.1 from net approval -24.3).
  • Latest polls — generic ballot 2026-10-14 (14 days old), approval 2026-10-14 (14 days old).
  • Generic-ballot average D+7.7 · support factor 0.87 (the share of that channel's capacity the admitted polls carry) — separate inputs; their product is a capacity diagnostic, not a margin.
  • Weights are the 55/25/20 capacities scaled by each channel's evidence and renormalized, so thin polling widens the interval instead of pulling the center toward zero — 12% of the weight is carried that way.
  • Blended national environment: D+8.3.
  • Applied at full strength to this chamber's races.
  • This step’s recorded contribution to the margin is +2.1.
  • Blended national environment: D+8.3 (updated 2026-10-14).
  • Effective poll weight 88%; fundamentals share 12%, carried by the interval (×1.06) rather than by the center.
  • The support factor is the share of the generic-ballot capacity the admitted polls carry; average × support is a capacity diagnostic, not a margin, and is not what the row above multiplies.
  • Applied at full strength to this chamber: +2.1 of this margin.

This race’s polls +0.482 points

What this race’s own recent polling adds beyond its prior. The forecast weights each poll for recency and sample size and counts each pollster once; the weights listed here are those of the polls’ own average.

  • DCCC Targeting Team (2026-10-25, n=478): D+1.0 · weight 0.57 in the poll average
  • Public Policy Polling (2026-10-22, n=570): D+1.0 · weight 0.61 in the poll average
  • The Washington Post/George Mason University Schar School of Policy and Government (2026-09-28, n=609): D+4.0 · weight 0.47 in the poll average
  • DCCC Targeting Team (2026-09-17, n=519): R+1.0 · weight 0.39 in the poll average
  • Ragnar Research Partners (2026-03-12, n=400): R+4.0 · weight 0.04 in the poll average
  • Public Policy Polling (2025-08-09, n=541): R+1.0 · not in the poll average
  • Poll average D+1.5, from 5 polls · 6 recorded polls. This is the polls’ own average, each poll at its published margin, the figure this page’s poll summary shows. In House races the forecast then counts a poll sponsored by a party or campaign at full weight and moves its margin 2 points against that party, which puts the average it reads at D+0.1. The forecast gives the polls 91% of the weight against its structural prior for this race, which moves the margin 0.5 points away from Republicans from where it stood before the polls. Eligible polls: latest poll: 2026-10-25 (3 days old).

Votes for other candidates −0.000 points

Every step above is measured between the two major-party candidates alone, as if nobody else were on the ballot. The forecast sets 0.6% of the vote aside for other candidates and write-ins, so as a share of every vote cast the gap between the two is smaller by that much. This step is exactly that: the two-party margin times the share going to other candidates. It is the same arithmetic that turns the two-party margin into the two shares printed at the top of the page.

The components this edition publishes for this race, in points. “Other factors” closes the sum to the two-party structural lean exactly. Here the structural lean IS the published margin, so the walk sums to the projection exactly; nothing is left over.

Named factorContribution
FundamentalsThe admitted fitted baseline. Its surviving variables differ by office; the source detail above identifies those used for this race.−2.50
National environmentThe national environment’s contribution to the prior. Polling can attenuate its influence; this value is not the national polling margin.+2.07
This race's pollsAdmitted head-to-head polls of this race, recency- and quality-weighted.+0.48
Other factors−0.00

Where the votes are

The map of this race loads here.

Recent elections

ElectionResultVotes cast
2024 · U.S. House ↗R+12.8478,906
2022 · U.S. House ↗R+13.0342,742
2020 · U.S. House ↗R+16.4448,178
2018 · U.S. House ↗R+10.5332,101

Historical district boundaries may differ. Margins are the Democrat’s share of all votes cast minus the Republican’s.

The money

The tick marks cash on hand. A missing filing stays blank rather than becoming $0.

One more fundraising reportCall the Map · $325

The candidates are comfortably out-fundraising the website covering them. A little rude, perhaps, but statistically unsurprising.

Received so far
$325
Measured compute
$26,188.58

Ko-fi and Buy Me a Coffee supports are counted as each one arrives. Measured compute prices model runs at standard published API rates; it is not what I paid. Hosting, data and subscriptions, the domain and my own time are not counted. Donations buy gratitude, never a forecast adjustment.

Supporters are listed by first name and last initial; a username alone is shortened to its first eight characters. Want your full name shown? Say so in your message. Give privately, or leave the name blank, and you are listed as Anonymous, with the platform and date. Supporters who give a name may also be thanked by name in the newsletter.

Thank you to Tom H., ColoradoFlyer, Chris, EW, gbaileym…, True Independent, MT V., JBL, Erin G., Caroline M., Melanie, MKV and 7 more.

See the public support ledger →

Outside spending

Separate from what the campaigns raised

For and against Shannon Taylor$1.2M

11 spending groups
GroupForAgainst
SD 2026$267K$0
COMMONWEALTH ACTION PAC$0$215K
LCV Victory Fund$158K$0
Progressive Turnout Project$154K$0
NO GOING BACK PAC INC.$0$152K
MAGA INC.$0$119K
CFFE PAC$60K$0
HMP$32K$0
CIVIC RENEWAL FUND INC.$0$19K
AB PAC$5K$0
Neighbor Voices$1K$0

For and against Rob Wittman$5.9M

13 spending groups
GroupForAgainst
HMP$0$2.0M
YOUR COMMUNITY PAC$0$1.8M
LCV Victory Fund$0$1.1M
NRDC Action Votes$0$300K
COMMONWEALTH ACTION PAC$215K$0
NO GOING BACK PAC INC.$149K$0
AB PAC$0$127K
CIVIC RENEWAL FUND INC.$100K$0
National Association of Realtors Political Action Committee$71K$0
CFFE PAC$0$56K
Protect Liberty PAC$40K$0
NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA POLITICAL VICTORY FUND$5K$0
Neighbor Voices$0$1K

Includes primary spending. Opposition is recorded against its named target; no benefit to another candidate is assumed.

FEC filings · through 07/15/2026 · Definitions & method

Race context

2024 presidential vote here
484,061
2024 presidential margin
R+5.0between the two parties

Population profile

White alone · 73.8%583,285 of 789,933 · Residents2022 Census · matched race geography

Coverage

Forecast as of October 28, 2026: Call the Map currently has Shannon Taylor and Rob Wittman tied, with Taylor at a 51 in 100 chance to win. The seat is currently held by a Republican. A win for Taylor would flip the seat to Democrats. The current poll average is D+1.5; 6 public polls are recorded.