Call
the Map
FORECAST51 DAYS OUT
House3 November 2026 · 51 days out

Bobby Pulido has a slight edge to flip TX-15’s House seat. Predicted margin: D+0.5.

Bobby Pulido (D)53 in 10053.5%49.8high 53.3 · low 46.3
Monica De La Cruz (R)47 in 10046.5%49.3high 52.8 · low 45.8

high / low: vote share (%) in the middle 80 in 100 simulations

About this field

S. Texas realignment seat.

Forecast share averages the simulated vote. Win chance counts how often a candidate wins. A wider range of outcomes can give a candidate a higher win chance despite a lower average share.

Tilt D80% range · margin points R+6.5 to D+7.5Republican-held seat

Forecast history

Steady0.0 pts · Sep 11 → Sep 13TX-15 U.S. House: steady — the published margin moved 0.0 points between the Sep 11 and Sep 13 editions (3 of 5 stored editions). This is movement of the published forecast between editions.
EVENAug 1Nov 3 · Election Day

Latest reading · Sep 13 · first published Sep 9 · 80% range · margin points R+6.5 to D+7.5. Methodology

Hover the line, tap it, or use the arrow keys to inspect its history.

About this series

This comparable series begins on September 9, 2026, when the model version changed to CTMM 2.2. Earlier readings remain in the archive and are not joined as voter movement; faded points before September 9, 2026 are reconstructions, not forecasts issued on those days.

Faded: CTMM 2.2 reconstructed history: computed after the fact with each date's available polls and environment, without expert ratings; not an issued forecast. Issued forecasts begin at the launch marker.

The polls

Ledger weighted average D+4.5Used by the forecast: 4 polls (60-day half-life) · measured D+3.7 · after the fitted poll-error shift D+3.74 recorded polls · 4 eligible for the aggregate · 4 with positive weight

FieldworkAddedPollsterResultSample
from 2026-08-18Barbara Jordan Public Policy Research and Survey CenterD+5.0D 50% · R 45%700 LV
from 2026-07-23Normington Petts (D)D+6.0D 51% · R 45%553 LV
from 2026-05-18ApplecartWelcomePACD+2.0D 48% · R 46%802 LV
from 2025-09-10Public Policy PollingHouse Majority PACR+3.0D 38% · R 41%533 RV
Explore poll adjustments

4 of 4 matching · 4 total

Ledger weighted average D+4.5

Barbara Jordan Public Policy Research and Survey Center22 Aug · 700 LV · added 26 Aug
Normington Petts (D)27 Jul · 553 LV · added 5 Aug
Applecart25 May · 802 LV · added 19 Aug
Public Policy Polling11 Sep · 533 RV · added 19 Aug
Explore all 4 polls for this race

How the margin was built

Follow each contribution to the margin. Wider ribbons mean more percentage points. Tap an input for its calculation and source.

Toward D+18.2
Toward R−17.7
Forecast marginD+0.5

The signed totals combine at the forecast. Displayed values are rounded.

All calculations & sources

This district's measured terrain −17.717 points

Call the Map's partisan lean on the CURRENT district lines, before any current-cycle evidence. Every pull below is measured from here — not from EVEN.

  • Call the Map partisan lean, district geography bound to this forecast edition.
  • Prior source: official_reaggregation_tx; district redrawn for 2026.

This race’s polls +10.848 points

What this race’s own recent polling adds beyond its prior, after each poll is weighted for recency, sample size and pollster quality.

  • District/state polling admitted under the shared rule.
  • Barbara Jordan Public Policy Research and Survey Center (2026-08-22, n=700): D+5.0 · weight 0.56
  • Normington Petts (D) (2026-07-27, n=553): D+6.0 · weight 0.21
  • Applecart (2026-05-25, n=802): D+2.0 · weight 0.03
  • Public Policy Polling (2025-09-11, n=533): R+3.0 · weight 0.00
  • Adjusted poll-bank aggregate D+4.5 · 4 recorded polls · 4 eligible for the aggregate · 4 with positive weight. The sealed model records a net polling contribution of +10.8 D. Observation weights are not the final model blend weight. Eligible polls: latest poll: 2026-08-22 (22 days old).
  • Adjusted poll-bank aggregate D+4.5 · 4 recorded polls · 4 eligible for the aggregate · 4 with positive weight; recorded polling contribution +10.8 D. These observation weights must not be read as the model’s final prior-versus-polling weight. Eligible polls: latest poll: 2026-08-22 (22 days old).

Fitted model, above the terrain shown +5.967 points

What the fitted model adds on top of the starting terrain above — incumbency, past results, campaign finance and the other fitted terms — measured from that terrain rather than from EVEN. It is a comparison with the starting point already shown, not a separate input. The source detail lists the variables the fit uses.

  • Fitted baseline -11.750 minus starting point -17.717 = 5.967 points.
  • One fitted structural total; this edition does not split it into partisan lean and incumbency.
  • Fundamentals: −11.8 — the district's structural lean before this year's polling, money and candidate quality are added.
  • This edition publishes that as one fitted total. It does not break it into a partisan-lean and an incumbency term, so this page does not invent that split.
  • fundamentals core = 25-term dynamic formula (mass fit over the master feature matrix, held-out-cycle validated; see matrix/feature_dictionary.md + mass_fit_report.json)
  • 40-term formula, held-out validated.

National environment +1.365 points

The contribution to this race’s margin, not the national polling margin itself. The race’s loading, reference level and polling blend determine how much of the national climate reaches its final forecast.

  • Three-source blend, updated 2026-09-08: 52% generic-ballot aggregates (D+6.5) · 28% special-election overperformance (D+9.0 across 46 specials) · 20% approval-implied (D+8.6 from net approval -21.7).
  • Latest polls — generic ballot 2026-09-08 (5 days old), approval 2026-09-10 (3 days old).
  • Generic-ballot average D+6.5 · support factor 0.84 (the share of that channel's capacity the admitted polls carry) — separate inputs; their product is a capacity diagnostic, not a margin.
  • Weights are the 55/25/20 capacities scaled by each channel's evidence and renormalized, so thin polling widens the interval instead of pulling the center toward zero — 16% of the weight is carried that way.
  • Blended national environment: D+7.6.
  • Applied at full strength to this chamber's races.
  • The work: national environment × 1 chamber strength = +1.4 of this margin.
  • Blended national environment: D+7.6 (updated 2026-09-08).
  • Effective poll weight 84%; fundamentals share 16%, carried by the interval (×1.08) rather than by the center.
  • The support factor is the share of the generic-ballot capacity the admitted polls carry; average × support is a capacity diagnostic, not a margin, and is not what the row above multiplies.
  • Applied at full strength to this chamber: +1.4 of this margin.

The components this edition publishes for this race, in points. “Other factors” closes the sum to the two-party structural lean exactly. Here the structural lean IS the published margin, so the walk sums to the projection exactly; nothing is left over.

Named factorContribution
FundamentalsThe admitted fitted baseline. Its surviving variables differ by office; the source detail above identifies those used for this race.−11.75
This race's pollsAdmitted head-to-head polls of this race, recency- and quality-weighted.+10.85
National environmentThe national environment’s contribution to the prior. Polling can attenuate its influence; this value is not the national polling margin.+1.37
Other factors+0.00

Recent elections

ElectionResultVotes cast
2024 · U.S. HouseR+14.2223,769
2022 · U.S. HouseR+8.6151,889
2020 · U.S. HouseD+2.9228,917
2018 · U.S. HouseD+21.3164,802

Historical district boundaries may differ. Margins compare Democratic and Republican vote totals. Nonstandard ballots are labeled separately.

The money

Bar length compares reported receipts in this race; the tick marks cash on hand. A missing filing stays blank rather than becoming $0.

One more fundraising reportCall the Map · $0

The candidates are comfortably out-fundraising the website covering them. A little rude, perhaps, but statistically unsurprising.

Received so far
$0
Measured compute
$26,188.58

Ko-fi and Buy Me a Coffee receipts are counted through Sep 1, 2026. Measured compute prices model runs at standard published API rates; it is not what I paid. Hosting, data and subscriptions, the domain and my own time are not counted. Donations buy gratitude, never a forecast adjustment.

See the public support ledger →

Outside spending

Support + opposition · separate from receipts

For and against Bobby Pulido$1.3M

6 spending groups
GroupForAgainst
BDA PAC$998K$0
WelcomePAC$96K$0
Latino Victory Fund$83K$0
Project 218$56K$0
NO GOING BACK PAC INC.$0$30K
Lone Star Rising PAC$1K$0

For and against Monica De La Cruz$252K

3 spending groups
GroupForAgainst
AB PAC$0$215K
HMP$0$31K
America PAC$6K$0

Includes primary spending. Opposition is recorded against its named target; no benefit to another candidate is assumed.

FEC filings · through 06/30/2026 · Definitions & method

Race context

Forecast votes cast
160,593
2024 presidential margin
R+18.0