Texas · Governor
Greg Abbott is favored to hold the Texas governorship. Predicted margin: R+5.4.
Under each share, its likely range (80 in 100 simulations) · * incumbent
Forecast history
Latest reading · Oct 28 · first published Sep 9 · 80% range · margin points R+12.5 to D+1.9. Methodology
About this series
Reconstructed with the current model Aug 1 – Sep 8 and Sep 16 – Sep 18; published readings Sep 9 – Oct 28. Each reconstructed day is the current model on that day’s own inputs, not a forecast published then. Corrections are dated in the changelog.
Faded: CTMM 2.2 reconstructed history: computed after the fact with each date's available polls and environment, without expert ratings; not an issued forecast. Issued forecasts begin at the launch marker.
CTMM 2.2 readings for 2026-09-16, 2026-09-17, 2026-09-18 were computed after the fact with each day's available inputs: no edition was issued on those days. Not an issued forecast.
Data table
| Date | Margin | Chance | 80% range | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28 | R+5.4 | R win 82.1% | R+12.5 to D+1.9 | Published forecast |
| Oct 27 | R+5.7 | R win 84.0% | R+13.0 to D+1.5 | Published forecast |
| Oct 26 | R+5.7 | R win 84.1% | R+13.0 to D+1.5 | Published forecast |
| Oct 25 | R+5.9 | R win 84.5% | R+13.1 to D+1.4 | Published forecast |
| Oct 24 | R+5.9 | R win 84.7% | R+13.2 to D+1.3 | Published forecast |
| Oct 23 | R+6.0 | R win 85.0% | R+13.3 to D+1.2 | Published forecast |
| Oct 22 | R+6.2 | R win 85.5% | R+13.4 to D+1.1 | Published forecast |
| Oct 21 | R+6.1 | R win 85.3% | R+13.4 to D+1.2 | Published forecast |
| Oct 20 | R+6.3 | R win 85.8% | R+13.5 to D+1.0 | Published forecast |
| Oct 19 | R+6.3 | R win 86.0% | R+13.6 to D+1.0 | Published forecast |
| Oct 18 | R+6.3 | R win 86.0% | R+13.6 to D+1.0 | Published forecast |
| Oct 17 | R+6.4 | R win 86.2% | R+13.7 to D+0.9 | Published forecast |
| Oct 16 | R+6.4 | R win 86.7% | R+13.7 to D+0.9 | Published forecast |
| Oct 15 | R+6.5 | R win 86.9% | R+13.8 to D+0.8 | Published forecast |
| Oct 14 | R+6.9 | R win 88.0% | R+14.2 to D+0.5 | Published forecast |
| Oct 13 | R+6.9 | R win 88.1% | R+14.2 to D+0.4 | Published forecast |
| Oct 12 | R+7.0 | R win 88.5% | R+14.3 to D+0.3 | Published forecast |
| Oct 11 | R+7.0 | R win 88.5% | R+14.3 to D+0.3 | Published forecast |
| Oct 10 | R+7.1 | R win 88.7% | R+14.4 to D+0.3 | Published forecast |
| Oct 9 | R+7.1 | R win 88.8% | R+14.5 to D+0.2 | Published forecast |
| Oct 8 | R+7.1 | R win 88.8% | R+14.5 to D+0.2 | Published forecast |
| Oct 7 | R+7.3 | R win 89.2% | R+14.6 to D+0.1 | Published forecast |
| Oct 6 | R+7.5 | R win 90.0% | R+14.8 to R+0.1 | Published forecast |
| Oct 5 | R+7.6 | R win 90.1% | R+14.9 to R+0.2 | Published forecast |
| Oct 4 | R+7.6 | R win 90.5% | R+15.0 to R+0.3 | Published forecast |
| Oct 3 | R+8.0 | R win 91.4% | R+15.4 to R+0.6 | Published forecast |
| Oct 2 | R+8.1 | R win 91.4% | R+15.4 to R+0.7 | Published forecast |
| Oct 1 | R+8.0 | R win 91.1% | R+15.4 to R+0.6 | Published forecast |
| Sep 30 | R+8.1 | R win 91.3% | R+15.4 to R+0.7 | Published forecast |
| Sep 29 | R+8.1 | R win 91.6% | R+15.5 to R+0.7 | Published forecast |
| Sep 28 | R+8.2 | R win 91.7% | R+15.6 to R+0.8 | Published forecast |
| Sep 27 | R+8.3 | R win 91.8% | R+15.7 to R+0.9 | Published forecast |
| Sep 26 | R+7.9 | R win 91.2% | R+15.4 to R+0.5 | Published forecast |
| Sep 25 | R+8.0 | R win 91.1% | R+15.4 to R+0.6 | Published forecast |
| Sep 24 | R+8.1 | R win 91.4% | R+15.5 to R+0.6 | Published forecast |
| Sep 23 | R+8.1 | R win 91.7% | R+15.6 to R+0.7 | Published forecast |
| Sep 22 | R+8.9 | R win 93.2% | R+16.3 to R+1.4 | Published forecast |
| Sep 21 | R+8.9 | R win 93.2% | R+16.3 to R+1.4 | Published forecast |
| Sep 20 | R+8.9 | R win 92.9% | R+16.3 to R+1.4 | Published forecast |
| Sep 19 | R+8.9 | R win 93.1% | R+16.4 to R+1.5 | Published forecast |
| Sep 18 | R+9.4 | R win 94.2% | R+16.9 to R+1.9 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 17 | R+9.5 | R win 94.3% | R+16.9 to R+2.0 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 16 | R+9.8 | R win 94.1% | R+17.3 to R+2.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 15 | R+9.8 | R win 94.0% | R+17.3 to R+2.4 | Published forecast |
| Sep 14 | R+9.9 | R win 94.0% | R+17.4 to R+2.4 | Published forecast |
| Sep 13 | R+9.7 | R win 93.9% | R+17.2 to R+2.2 | Published forecast |
| Sep 12 | R+9.8 | R win 93.9% | R+17.3 to R+2.3 | Published forecast |
| Sep 11 | R+9.9 | R win 94.0% | R+17.4 to R+2.4 | Published forecast |
| Sep 10 | R+9.9 | R win 94.1% | R+17.4 to R+2.4 | Published forecast |
| Sep 9 | R+10.0 | R win 94.1% | R+17.5 to R+2.5 | Published forecast |
| Sep 8 | R+10.3 | R win 94.8% | R+17.8 to R+2.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 7 | R+10.4 | R win 94.9% | R+17.9 to R+2.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 6 | R+10.4 | R win 94.9% | R+18.0 to R+2.9 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 5 | R+10.7 | R win 95.3% | R+18.2 to R+3.2 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 4 | R+10.8 | R win 95.3% | R+18.3 to R+3.2 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 3 | R+10.8 | R win 95.4% | R+18.4 to R+3.3 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 2 | R+10.9 | R win 95.5% | R+18.4 to R+3.3 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 1 | R+11.1 | R win 95.7% | R+18.7 to R+3.5 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 31 | R+11.2 | R win 95.8% | R+18.7 to R+3.6 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 30 | R+11.2 | R win 95.8% | R+18.8 to R+3.7 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 29 | R+11.3 | R win 95.9% | R+18.9 to R+3.7 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 28 | R+11.4 | R win 95.9% | R+18.9 to R+3.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 27 | R+11.4 | R win 96.0% | R+19.0 to R+3.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 26 | R+11.4 | R win 96.0% | R+19.0 to R+3.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 25 | R+11.5 | R win 96.0% | R+19.1 to R+3.9 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 24 | R+11.5 | R win 96.1% | R+19.1 to R+3.9 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 23 | R+11.6 | R win 96.1% | R+19.2 to R+4.0 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 22 | R+11.7 | R win 96.3% | R+19.3 to R+4.1 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 21 | R+11.8 | R win 96.0% | R+19.5 to R+4.2 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 20 | R+11.9 | R win 96.1% | R+19.5 to R+4.3 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 19 | R+12.0 | R win 96.2% | R+19.6 to R+4.3 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 18 | R+12.0 | R win 96.2% | R+19.7 to R+4.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 17 | R+12.1 | R win 96.2% | R+19.7 to R+4.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 16 | R+12.2 | R win 96.3% | R+19.8 to R+4.5 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 15 | R+12.2 | R win 96.3% | R+19.9 to R+4.5 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 14 | R+12.3 | R win 96.4% | R+20.0 to R+4.6 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 13 | R+12.6 | R win 96.5% | R+20.2 to R+4.9 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 12 | R+12.9 | R win 96.8% | R+20.5 to R+5.2 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 11 | R+12.9 | R win 96.8% | R+20.6 to R+5.3 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 10 | R+13.0 | R win 96.9% | R+20.7 to R+5.3 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 9 | R+13.1 | R win 96.9% | R+20.7 to R+5.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 8 | R+13.1 | R win 97.0% | R+20.8 to R+5.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 7 | R+13.2 | R win 97.0% | R+20.9 to R+5.5 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 6 | R+13.7 | R win 97.2% | R+21.4 to R+6.0 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 5 | R+13.8 | R win 97.2% | R+21.5 to R+6.1 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 4 | R+13.8 | R win 97.3% | R+21.6 to R+6.1 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 3 | R+13.9 | R win 97.3% | R+21.6 to R+6.1 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 2 | R+13.9 | R win 97.3% | R+21.7 to R+6.2 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 1 | R+13.8 | R win 97.3% | R+21.5 to R+6.1 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
The polls
Poll average R+2.5A poll’s weight halves every 60 days and grows with its sample. Each pollster counts once, at its best release. Every poll counts at its published margin, sponsored or not.In governor races the forecast then counts a poll sponsored by a party or campaign at full weight and moves its margin 2 points against that party, which leaves the average it reads the same for this race. It then applies a fitted correction of 2.5 points toward Republicans for governor races, measured from past polling error, before blending it with its other evidence.55 recorded polls · 54 in the poll average
| Fieldwork | Added | Pollster | Result | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| from 2026-10-21 | 3h ago | YouGov Blue ↗ | D+3.0D 49% · R 46% | 1,000 LV |
| from 2026-10-13 | 1d ago | YouGov ↗ | R+2.0D 46% · R 48% | 1,000 RV |
| from 2026-10-15 | 5d ago | Pollfinity Research ↗ | R+1.0D 45% · R 46% | 278 RV |
| from 2026-10-15 | 5d ago | Slingshot Strategies ↗ | R+3.0D 48% · R 51% | 969 LV |
| from 2026-10-01 | 5d ago | Verasight ↗ | R+1.3D 46.4% · R 47.7% | 601 LV |
| from 2026-10-17 | 6d ago | Emerson College ↗ | R+4.5D 46.59% · R 51.07% | 1,000 LV |
| from 2026-10-17 | 7d ago | ActiVote ↗ | R+5.0D 47.5% · R 52.5% | 400 LV |
| from 2026-10-15 | 7d ago | Beacon Research/Shaw & Company Research ↗ | R+5.0D 47% · R 52% | 1,398 LV |
Explore each poll’s weight in the average
Poll average R+2.5
- Published result
- D+3.0
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.84 · 5.8% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 21 Oct–26 Oct
- Sample
- 1,000 LV
- Sponsor
- Not listed
- Published result
- R+5.0
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.50 · 1.8% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 17 Oct–21 Oct
- Sample
- 400 LV
- Sponsor
- Not listed
- Published result
- R+2.0
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.79 · 1.1% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 13 Oct–21 Oct
- Sample
- 1,000 RV
- Sponsor
- Not listed
- Published result
- R+1.3
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.61 · 4.2% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 1 Oct–20 Oct
- Sample
- 601 LV
- Sponsor
- Not listed
- Published result
- R+5.0
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.90 · 3.8% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 15 Oct–19 Oct
- Sample
- 1,398 LV
- Sponsor
- Not listed
- Published result
- R+4.5
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.78 · 2.5% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 17 Oct–19 Oct
- Sample
- 1,000 LV
- Sponsor
- Not listed
- Published result
- R+1.0
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.40 · 2.8% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 15 Oct–18 Oct
- Sample
- 278 RV
- Sponsor
- Not listed
- Published result
- R+3.0
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.75 · 1.7% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 15 Oct–18 Oct
- Sample
- 969 LV
- Sponsor
- Not listed
How the margin was built
Tap an input for its calculation and source.
Displayed values are rounded.
All calculations & sources
How this state voted, 2024 −13.690 points
The state's presidential margin in 2024 as a share of all votes cast, from our own county sums — the same measurement the model's statewide terrain center is built from. Every pull below is measured from here, not from EVEN, which is why a landslide seat's listed pulls are small numbers and still land where the forecast does.
- 2024 presidential result for this state, as a share of all votes cast, from Call the Map's own county sums.
- Same source as Act I's 2024-president reference mark, so the origin lands on it.
This race’s polls +15.385 points
What this race’s own recent polling adds beyond its prior. The forecast weights each poll for recency and sample size and counts each pollster once; the weights listed here are those of the polls’ own average.
- YouGov Blue (2026-10-26, n=1,000): D+3.0 · weight 0.84 in the poll average
- ActiVote (2026-10-21, n=400): R+5.0 · weight 0.50 in the poll average
- YouGov (2026-10-21, n=1,000): R+2.0 · weight 0.79 in the poll average
- Verasight (2026-10-20, n=601): R+1.3 · weight 0.61 in the poll average
- Emerson College (2026-10-19, n=1,000): R+4.5 · weight 0.78 in the poll average
- Beacon Research/Shaw & Company Research (2026-10-19, n=1,398): R+5.0 · weight 0.90 in the poll average
- … and 49 more below.
- Poll average R+2.5, from 54 polls · 55 recorded polls. This is the polls’ own average, each poll at its published margin, the figure this page’s poll summary shows. In governor races the forecast then counts a poll sponsored by a party or campaign at full weight and moves its margin 2 points against that party, which leaves the average it reads the same for this race. It then applies a fitted correction of 2.5 points toward Republicans for governor races, measured from past polling error, before blending it with its other evidence. The forecast gives the polls 98% of the weight against its structural prior for this race, which moves the margin 15.4 points away from Republicans from where it stood before the polls. Eligible polls: latest poll: 2026-10-26 (2 days old).
National environment +1.838 points
The contribution to this race’s margin, not the national polling margin itself. The race’s loading, reference level and polling blend determine how much of the national climate reaches its final forecast.
- The national environment in this edition is D+8.4. This row is its contribution to the race’s prior, not a claim that the country is D+1.8.
- This step’s recorded contribution to the margin is +1.8.
- The elasticity is fitted on the pooled panel of contested governor races (2010–2024) with cycle-clustered standard errors; it is a measured response to the national environment, not a judgment floor.
Fitted model, above the terrain shown −8.856 points
What the fitted model adds on top of the starting terrain above — incumbency, past results, campaign finance and the other fitted terms — measured from that terrain rather than from EVEN. It is a comparison with the starting point already shown, not a separate input. The source detail lists the variables the fit uses.
- Fitted baseline -22.546 minus starting point -13.690 = -8.856 points.
- Fitted intercept: -6.136 points.
- 2010 White population share used by the frozen historical fit: observed input 70.236. -0.503 × ((70.236 − 77.922) / 12.864) = 0.300 points.
- gov_midterm_wh: observed input -1.000. -0.987 × ((-1.000 − 0.336) / 0.739) = 1.785 points.
- 2024 presidential lean relative to the national result: observed input -12.378. 4.163 × ((-12.378 − -4.415) / 20.258) = -1.636 points.
- Previous governor election margin: observed input -10.900. 1.755 × ((-10.900 − -3.131) / 19.227) = -0.709 points.
- gov_inc_running_signed: observed input -1.000. 2.531 × ((-1.000 − -0.120) / 0.708) = -3.145 points.
- gov_inc_tenure_signed: observed input -3.000. 3.340 × ((-3.000 − -0.143) / 0.902) = -10.579 points.
- The displayed arithmetic is rounded; the fitted terms use full precision. The intercept plus these five terms gives the non-ratings baseline.
- No source-verified current Gallup reading supports the former 40% / July 2026 claim. The current Gallup series ends in 2025; the Presidency Project identifies its 2026 observations as other pollsters. Use the unchanged fitted missing-value rule, not a replacement polling scale.
- Certified 2024 presidential baseline: state R+13.9, national R+1.5; subtracting the national margin gives relative lean −12.4. Source: FEC compilation of certified state results.
Historical error calibration −0.057 points
A prior-election residual correction, when an admitted model publishes one.
- The forecast’s calibration against past governor results. The recorded contribution is −0.1.
Votes for other candidates +0.075 points
Every step above is measured between the two major-party candidates alone, as if nobody else were on the ballot. The forecast sets 1.4% of the vote aside for other candidates and write-ins, so as a share of every vote cast the gap between the two is smaller by that much. This step is exactly that: the two-party margin times the share going to other candidates. It is the same arithmetic that turns the two-party margin into the two shares printed at the top of the page.
The components this edition publishes for this race, in points. “Other factors” closes the sum to the two-party structural lean exactly. The margin the page prints is a share of every vote cast, so the “Votes for other candidates” row carries the exact difference between the two-party lean and that margin; with it, the walk sums to the printed margin exactly.
| Named factor | Contribution |
|---|---|
| FundamentalsThe admitted fitted baseline. Its surviving variables differ by office; the source detail above identifies those used for this race. | −22.55 |
| This race's pollsAdmitted head-to-head polls of this race, recency- and quality-weighted. | +15.39 |
| National environmentThe national environment’s contribution to the prior. Polling can attenuate its influence; this value is not the national polling margin. | +1.84 |
| Historical calibrationThe House lane's calibration against certified past cycles. | −0.06 |
| Other factors | 0.00 |
Where the votes are
The map of this race loads here.
Race context
- Turnout, 2018 midterm
- 45.1% 8,375,000 ballots
- Turnout, 2022 midterm
- 41.9% 8,151,590 ballots
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+13.9between the two parties
Turnout is ballots cast statewide as a share of the voting-eligible population. Source: University of Florida Election Lab ↗
Population profile
U.S. Census Bureau, 2022 American Community Survey 5-year estimates ↗
Coverage
5 stories · 7 quotes
- The records dispute comes just days before the Nov. 3 midterm elections. Gov. Greg Abbott is seeking a fourth term against his Democratic challenger, state Rep. Gina Hinojosa of Austin. Read More👉 ebx.sh/G0U5TR ↗
Texas Public Radio · Official · 1h ago
curated state newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match - Gov. Greg Abbott's emails with Elon Musk may indeed remain private after a court decided to pause an order giving his Democrat gubernatorial challenger access to the unredacted communications. ↗
Houston Public Media · Official · 2h ago
curated state newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match - A remarkable amount of money flowed into the Texas governor’s race over the last month, marked by a furious fundraising push by Gov. Greg Abbott as he finds himself in an unusually competitive race against Democrat Gina Hinojosa. ↗
Houston Public Media · Official · 5h ago
curated state newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match · election-topic match - Greg Abbott, Gina Hinojosa each post biggest fundraising hauls yet in final leg of Texas governor’s race ↗
Texas Tribune · Oct 27
- Here are the top races to watch this November 2026 election ↗
San Antonio Report · Oct 27
- A remarkable amount of money flowed into the Texas governor’s race last month, with Gov. Greg Abbott raising $26 million — the highest total he has posted in any reporting period this cycle. Democratic candidate Gina Hinojosa raised $17.5 million, her highest for a reporting period this cycle, too. ↗
Texas Tribune · Official · 22h ago
curated state newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match - A judge has sided with Democratic gubernatorial candidate Gina Hinojosa, ordering that Gov. Greg Abbott's office let her inspect unredacted communications with billionaire Elon Musk. Abbott has appealed.
Read More👉 ebx.sh/S0oWTJ ↗
Texas Public Radio · Official · 1d ago
curated state newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match - A judge has sided with state Rep. Gina Hinojosa after the Democratic gubernatorial candidate sued last week for access to unredacted versions of emails between Gov. Greg Abbott's office and billionaire business owner Elon Musk. ↗
Houston Public Media · Official · 1d ago
curated state newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match
Forecast as of October 28, 2026: Call the Map currently has Greg Abbott ahead of Gina Hinojosa by R+5.4, with an 82 in 100 chance to win. The seat is currently held by a Republican. That result would keep the seat with Republicans. The current poll average is R+2.5; 55 public polls are recorded.