← Back to the House
Forecast · r64-20260730-236b8cdd42f0 · as of 2026-07-30

The House · OH-05

Projected resultModel share · middle 80% of simulations · chance to win
DBrian Shaver113,189 votes
41.5
RBob Latta156,203 votes
57.2
Other3,549 votes
1.3
remainder

Projected turnout: 272,941 votes · model estimate, not counted votes.

Displayed shares include the model's Other-vote allowance and therefore add to 100%. Interval endpoints are the model's 10th and 90th percentiles, not a polling margin of error.

SURE — · not yet rateable

How reliable is the evidence behind this race's number — not who wins. A safe seat with no polls can score low while its forecast is easy.

No public poll of this race has been fielded yet. SURE rates poll evidence, so it has nothing to rate here — this is an absence of evidence, not a judgement that the evidence is weak.

Limited evidence: zero polls. The fitted race-error distribution widens automatically; no manual score penalty or race override is applied.

Effective poll evidence0.00
Race-specific error SD4.0 points
Historically calibrated 80% half-range±5.7
Model treatmentprovisional widen-only chamber fallback
Fundamentals Environment Polls Money (FEC) Roster settled

SURE v3 — historically calibrated evidence-conditioned uncertainty · generated 2026-07-27. SURE rates the EVIDENCE behind a race's number, not the outcome: a safe seat with no polls can score low while its forecast is easy. Never a second win probability. It changes only idiosyncratic uncertainty, never the center. Senate marginal intervals are historically calibrated under the stated 0-120 day assumptions; House/Governor conditioning is provisional and widen-only until chamber-specific history passes the same gates.

OH-05 · Ohio
Rating band
Striped = seat changes partyDistrict locator

County map

County view
Projected margin
R+40R+20EvenD+20D+40
Striped = seat changes partyProjected county outcome

Counties colored by the projected margin — the 2024 result shifted by the state's projected swing, summing exactly to the forecast above. Hover a county for its numbers.

County by county

CountyMarginBrian ShaverBob LattaTotal
LorainD+3.256,01152,443109,882
WoodR+5.914,30716,13730,845
HancockR+32.38,86517,48726,699
RichlandR+39.57,00416,34323,655
SanduskyR+22.87,95312,73220,957
HuronR+37.55,57512,40518,217
SenecaR+29.86,13411,42917,794
CrawfordR+46.73,5059,81213,492
WyandotR+45.92,1215,8128,037
ErieR+14.06007991,417
CuyahogaD+6.9449391851
LucasR+7.3291339638

Projected — each county's share of THIS district only (split counties count just the votes inside the lines), summing to the forecast above.

State of the race

Call the Map currently has Latta ahead of Shaver by R+16.0, with a >99 in 100 chance to win. The seat is currently held by a Republican. That result would keep the seat with Republicans. No current nominee-matched poll average is available, so the forecast is leaning on the non-polling evidence shown below.

CTM forecast
Solid R hold · >99 in 100
Seat
Rep.-held · projected hold
Forecast range
R+23.7 to R+8.3
Daily forecast

How the race is moving

100%R win probability today

Since the Jul 21 edition: margin 1.5 pts toward D · win probability unchanged

Estimated two-party vote shareLine = estimate · tint = 80% of simulations
D 42.0%● R 58.0%
Win probabilityProbability in each tracked daily edition
D 0%● R 100%

Tracked editions only. The pale segment marks the time remaining to Election Day; it is not fabricated future data. Hover, tap, or focus a chart and use the arrow keys for each edition's exact values.

How the margin was built

6 contributions, summing to the forecast R+16.0. Every model adjustment is published here — including candidate-quality shifts. Read how the whole margin is built →

Comparable evidenceFloor 0.05 · precision discount 0.1

TWIN neighbours

TWIN means Typology-Weighted Inference from Neighbors, Call the Map’s comparable-unit matching engine for any kind of race. It borrows poll residuals only—never centers, terrain, or outcomes. Similarity is demographic and behavioural, not geographic, and each contribution decays with similarity distance. Borrowed evidence always has lower precision than a race’s own polling.

Borrowed residual before discount +5.223Published margin contribution +0.123
10/10 governed nearest similar races are available in the published artifact.
RaceRoleSimilarityResidual contributedDirection
IN-03Fellow recipient0.847±0.000 ptsnone
IN-09Fellow recipient0.844±0.000 ptsnone
IN-02Fellow recipient0.800±0.000 ptsnone
MO-06Fellow recipient0.794±0.000 ptsnone
WI-08Fellow recipient0.769±0.000 ptsnone
WI-06Lender (polled)0.768−7.200 ptstoward R
IN-06Fellow recipient0.763±0.000 ptsnone
IN-08Fellow recipient0.760±0.000 ptsnone
OH-14Fellow recipient0.759±0.000 ptsnone
NC-10Lender (polled)0.752−5.400 ptstoward R

Signals at a glance

CTM Partisan Lean Index
R+23.9
Historical match quality
87/100 — How closely this race matches its eight historical analogues; not a win probability.

Recent polling

No polls yet for this race — the forecast rests on fundamentals only (partisan lean, fundraising, incumbency).

Comparable past results

On the same ballot in Ohio