Call
the Map
Forecast5 days out
← HouseNovember 3, 2026

NC-01 · U.S. House

Don Davis is favored to hold North Carolina’s 1st congressional district. Predicted margin: D+3.0.

Don Davis incumbent (D)73 in 10050.947.7–54.1
Laurie Buckhout (R)27 in 10047.944.7–51.1
Other (O)—1.2
Show all others (1)

Tom Bailey

Other is a combined forecast; individual estimates are not published.

Ballot eligibility alone supplies no quantitative estimate. Other is a collective share, not any named candidate’s forecast. Official ballot sources: Tom Bailey (checked 2026-08-31).

Under each share, its likely range (80 in 100 simulations) · * incumbent

Lean DDemocratic-held seat

Forecast history

Moving R · strong-3.0 pts · Oct 26 → Oct 28NC-01 U.S. House: moving toward the Republican, strong — the published margin moved -3.0 points between the Oct 26 and Oct 28 editions (3 of 47 stored editions). This is movement of the published forecast between editions.
D+5EVENR+5Aug 1Nov 3 · Election Day

Latest reading · Oct 28 · first published Sep 9 · 80% range · margin points R+3.4 to D+9.3. Methodology

 

About this series

Reconstructed with the current model Aug 1 – Sep 8 and Sep 16 – Sep 18; published readings Sep 9 – Oct 28. Each reconstructed day is the current model on that day’s own inputs, not a forecast published then. Corrections are dated in the changelog.

Faded: CTMM 2.2 reconstructed history: computed after the fact with each date's available polls and environment, without expert ratings; not an issued forecast. Issued forecasts begin at the launch marker.

CTMM 2.2 readings for 2026-09-16, 2026-09-17, 2026-09-18 were computed after the fact with each day's available inputs: no edition was issued on those days. Not an issued forecast.

Data table
DateMarginChance80% rangeReading
Oct 28D+3.0D win 72.9%R+3.4 to D+9.3Published forecast
Oct 27D+4.9D win 83.2%R+1.7 to D+11.4Published forecast
Oct 26D+5.9D win 88.0%R+0.5 to D+12.4Published forecast
Oct 25D+5.9D win 88.0%R+0.5 to D+12.4Published forecast
Oct 24D+5.9D win 88.0%R+0.5 to D+12.4Published forecast
Oct 23D+5.9D win 87.9%R+0.5 to D+12.4Published forecast
Oct 22D+5.9D win 87.9%R+0.5 to D+12.4Published forecast
Oct 21D+5.9D win 87.9%R+0.5 to D+12.4Published forecast
Oct 20D+5.9D win 87.9%R+0.5 to D+12.4Published forecast
Oct 19D+5.9D win 87.9%R+0.5 to D+12.4Published forecast
Oct 18D+5.9D win 87.9%R+0.5 to D+12.4Published forecast
Oct 17D+5.9D win 87.9%R+0.5 to D+12.4Published forecast
Oct 16D+5.9D win 87.8%R+0.5 to D+12.4Published forecast
Oct 15D+5.9D win 87.8%R+0.6 to D+12.4Published forecast
Oct 14D+5.9D win 87.8%R+0.6 to D+12.4Published forecast
Oct 13D+5.9D win 87.8%R+0.6 to D+12.4Published forecast
Oct 12D+5.9D win 87.9%R+0.5 to D+12.4Published forecast
Oct 11D+5.9D win 87.9%R+0.5 to D+12.4Published forecast
Oct 10D+5.9D win 87.9%R+0.5 to D+12.4Published forecast
Oct 9D+7.1D win 91.3%D+0.5 to D+13.7Published forecast
Oct 8D+4.7D win 81.3%R+2.2 to D+11.5Published forecast
Oct 7D+4.0D win 77.6%R+2.9 to D+11.0Published forecast
Oct 6D+4.0D win 77.5%R+3.0 to D+11.0Published forecast
Oct 5D+4.0D win 77.3%R+3.0 to D+11.0Published forecast
Oct 4D+4.0D win 77.3%R+3.0 to D+11.0Published forecast
Oct 3D+4.0D win 77.1%R+3.0 to D+11.0Published forecast
Oct 2D+4.0D win 77.5%R+3.0 to D+11.0Published forecast
Oct 1D+4.0D win 77.4%R+3.0 to D+11.0Published forecast
Sep 30D+4.0D win 77.3%R+3.0 to D+11.0Published forecast
Sep 29D+4.0D win 77.2%R+3.0 to D+11.0Published forecast
Sep 28D+4.0D win 77.4%R+3.0 to D+11.0Published forecast
Sep 27D+4.0D win 77.2%R+3.0 to D+11.0Published forecast
Sep 26D+4.0D win 77.1%R+3.0 to D+11.0Published forecast
Sep 25D+4.0D win 77.2%R+3.0 to D+11.0Published forecast
Sep 24D+4.0D win 77.2%R+3.0 to D+10.9Published forecast
Sep 23D+3.9D win 77.0%R+3.0 to D+10.9Published forecast
Sep 22D+3.9D win 76.7%R+3.1 to D+10.9Published forecast
Sep 21D+3.9D win 76.7%R+3.1 to D+10.9Published forecast
Sep 20D+3.9D win 77.1%R+3.1 to D+10.9Published forecast
Sep 19D+3.9D win 77.0%R+3.1 to D+10.9Published forecast
Sep 18D+3.9D win 77.6%R+3.1 to D+10.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 17D+3.9D win 77.6%R+3.1 to D+10.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 16D+3.9D win 77.1%R+3.1 to D+10.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 15D+2.9D win 70.1%R+4.3 to D+10.2Published forecast
Sep 14D+2.9D win 70.3%R+4.3 to D+10.2Published forecast
Sep 13D+2.9D win 70.4%R+4.3 to D+10.2Published forecast
Sep 12D+2.9D win 69.9%R+4.3 to D+10.2Published forecast
Sep 11D+2.9D win 70.0%R+4.4 to D+10.2Published forecast
Sep 10D+2.9D win 69.8%R+4.4 to D+10.1Published forecast
Sep 9D+2.9D win 69.9%R+4.4 to D+10.1Published forecast
Sep 8D+2.8D win 70.2%R+4.4 to D+10.1Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 7D+2.8D win 70.0%R+4.5 to D+10.1Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 6R+5.0R win 81.2%R+12.3 to D+2.3Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 5R+5.0R win 80.9%R+12.3 to D+2.3Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 4R+5.0R win 80.8%R+12.3 to D+2.3Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 3R+4.9R win 80.6%R+12.2 to D+2.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 2R+4.9R win 80.5%R+12.2 to D+2.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 1R+4.8R win 80.2%R+12.1 to D+2.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 31R+4.8R win 79.9%R+12.1 to D+2.5Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 30R+4.8R win 79.7%R+12.1 to D+2.5Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 29R+4.7R win 79.4%R+12.0 to D+2.6Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 28R+4.7R win 79.3%R+12.0 to D+2.6Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 27R+4.6R win 79.0%R+11.9 to D+2.7Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 26R+4.6R win 79.0%R+11.9 to D+2.7Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 25R+4.6R win 78.7%R+11.9 to D+2.8Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 24R+4.5R win 78.5%R+11.8 to D+2.8Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 23R+4.5R win 78.3%R+11.8 to D+2.8Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 22R+4.4R win 78.0%R+11.8 to D+2.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 21R+4.4R win 78.4%R+11.7 to D+2.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 20R+4.4R win 78.2%R+11.7 to D+3.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 19R+4.3R win 78.0%R+11.6 to D+3.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 18R+4.3R win 77.8%R+11.6 to D+3.1Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 17R+4.2R win 77.5%R+11.5 to D+3.1Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 16R+4.2R win 77.3%R+11.5 to D+3.1Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 15R+4.1R win 77.1%R+11.5 to D+3.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 14R+4.1R win 77.1%R+11.5 to D+3.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 13R+4.1R win 76.9%R+11.4 to D+3.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 12R+4.0R win 76.6%R+11.4 to D+3.3Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 11R+4.0R win 76.4%R+11.3 to D+3.3Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 10R+4.0R win 76.2%R+11.3 to D+3.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 9R+3.9R win 76.0%R+11.3 to D+3.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 8R+3.9R win 75.8%R+11.2 to D+3.5Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 7R+3.8R win 75.6%R+11.2 to D+3.5Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 6R+3.8R win 75.6%R+11.2 to D+3.5Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 5R+3.8R win 75.4%R+11.2 to D+3.5Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 4R+3.8R win 75.2%R+11.1 to D+3.6Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 3R+3.7R win 74.9%R+11.1 to D+3.6Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 2R+3.7R win 74.8%R+11.0 to D+3.7Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 1R+3.6R win 74.5%R+11.0 to D+3.7Reconstructed with the stated inputs

The polls

Poll average D+3.7A poll’s weight halves every 60 days and grows with its sample. Each pollster counts once, at its best release. Every poll counts at its published margin, sponsored or not.In House races the forecast then counts a poll sponsored by a party or campaign at full weight and moves its margin 2 points against that party, which puts the average it reads at D+2.8.8 recorded polls · 8 in the poll average

FieldworkAddedPollsterResultSample
from 2026-10-2014h agoRedBox Research (D) ↗D+1.0D 45% · R 44%1,468 LV
from 2026-10-06co/efficient ↗R+1.0D 42% · R 43%623 LV
from 2026-10-01Neighborhood Research Corporation ↗D+10.0D 51% · R 41%303 LV
from 2026-09-29GQR ↗D+8.0D 47% · R 39%500 LV
from 2026-09-08GBAO ↗House Majority PACD+7.0D 50% · R 43%500 LV
from 2026-06-22GQR ↗D+4.0D 45% · R 41%500 LV
from 2026-04-25co/efficient ↗NRCCEVEND 41% · R 41%842 LV
from 2026-01-29GQR ↗D+3.0D 42% · R 39%500 LV
Explore each poll’s weight in the average

8 of 8 matching · 8 total

Poll average D+3.7

RedBox Research (D)23 Oct · 1,468 LV · added 28 Oct
co/efficient8 Oct · 623 LV · added 9 Oct
Neighborhood Research Corporation6 Oct · 303 LV · added 8 Oct
GQR4 Oct · 500 LV · added 7 Oct
GBAO11 Sep · 500 LV · added 19 Sep
GQR28 Jun · 500 LV · added 19 Aug
co/efficient29 Apr · 842 LV · added 19 Aug
GQR2 Feb · 500 LV · added 19 Aug
Explore all 8 polls for this race

How the margin was built

Tap an input for its calculation and source.

Toward D+16.9
Toward R−13.9
Forecast marginD+3.0

Displayed values are rounded.

All calculations & sources

This district's measured terrain −11.417 points

Call the Map's partisan lean on the CURRENT district lines, before any current-cycle evidence. Every pull below is measured from here — not from EVEN.

  • Call the Map partisan lean, district geography bound to this forecast edition.
  • Prior source: official_reaggregation_nc_contested_subset; district redrawn for 2026.

Fitted model, above the terrain shown +14.835 points

What the fitted model adds on top of the starting terrain above — incumbency, past results, campaign finance and the other fitted terms — measured from that terrain rather than from EVEN. It is a comparison with the starting point already shown, not a separate input. The source detail lists the variables the fit uses.

  • Fitted baseline 3.418 minus starting point -11.417 = 14.835 points.
  • One fitted structural total; this edition does not split it into partisan lean and incumbency.
  • Fundamentals: +3.4 — the district's structural lean before this year's polling, money and candidate quality are added.
  • This edition publishes that as one fitted total. It does not break it into a partisan-lean and an incumbency term, so this page does not invent that split.
  • fundamentals core = 25-term dynamic formula (mass fit over the master feature matrix, held-out-cycle validated; see matrix/feature_dictionary.md + mass_fit_report.json)
  • 40-term formula, held-out validated.

National environment +2.071 points

The contribution to this race’s margin, not the national polling margin itself. The race’s loading, reference level and polling blend determine how much of the national climate reaches its final forecast.

  • Three-source blend, updated 2026-10-14: 53% generic-ballot aggregates (D+7.7) · 28% special-election overperformance (D+9.0 across 46 specials) · 20% approval-implied (D+9.1 from net approval -24.3).
  • Latest polls — generic ballot 2026-10-14 (15 days old), approval 2026-10-14 (15 days old).
  • Generic-ballot average D+7.7 · support factor 0.87 (the share of that channel's capacity the admitted polls carry) — separate inputs; their product is a capacity diagnostic, not a margin.
  • Weights are the 55/25/20 capacities scaled by each channel's evidence and renormalized, so thin polling widens the interval instead of pulling the center toward zero — 12% of the weight is carried that way.
  • Blended national environment: D+8.3.
  • Applied at full strength to this chamber's races.
  • This step’s recorded contribution to the margin is +2.1.
  • Blended national environment: D+8.3 (updated 2026-10-14).
  • Effective poll weight 88%; fundamentals share 12%, carried by the interval (×1.06) rather than by the center.
  • The support factor is the share of the generic-ballot capacity the admitted polls carry; average × support is a capacity diagnostic, not a margin, and is not what the row above multiplies.
  • Applied at full strength to this chamber: +2.1 of this margin.

This race’s polls −2.488 points

What this race’s own recent polling adds beyond its prior. The forecast weights each poll for recency and sample size and counts each pollster once; the weights listed here are those of the polls’ own average.

  • RedBox Research (D) (2026-10-23, n=1,468): D+1.0 · weight 0.94 in the poll average
  • co/efficient (2026-10-08, n=623): R+1.0 · weight 0.54 in the poll average
  • Neighborhood Research Corporation (2026-10-06, n=303): D+10.0 · weight 0.37 in the poll average
  • GQR (2026-10-04, n=500): D+8.0 · weight 0.46 in the poll average
  • GBAO (2026-09-11, n=500): D+7.0 · weight 0.35 in the poll average
  • GQR (2026-06-28, n=500): D+4.0 · weight 0.15 in the poll average
  • … and 2 more below.
  • Poll average D+3.7, from 8 polls · 8 recorded polls. This is the polls’ own average, each poll at its published margin, the figure this page’s poll summary shows. In House races the forecast then counts a poll sponsored by a party or campaign at full weight and moves its margin 2 points against that party, which puts the average it reads at D+2.8. The forecast gives the polls 91% of the weight against its structural prior for this race, which moves the margin 2.5 points toward Republicans from where it stood before the polls. Eligible polls: latest poll: 2026-10-23 (6 days old).

Votes for other candidates −0.036 points

Every step above is measured between the two major-party candidates alone, as if nobody else were on the ballot. The forecast sets 1.2% of the vote aside for other candidates and write-ins, so as a share of every vote cast the gap between the two is smaller by that much. This step is exactly that: the two-party margin times the share going to other candidates. It is the same arithmetic that turns the two-party margin into the two shares printed at the top of the page.

The components this edition publishes for this race, in points. “Other factors” closes the sum to the two-party structural lean exactly. The margin the page prints is a share of every vote cast, so the “Votes for other candidates” row carries the exact difference between the two-party lean and that margin; with it, the walk sums to the printed margin exactly.

Named factorContribution
FundamentalsThe admitted fitted baseline. Its surviving variables differ by office; the source detail above identifies those used for this race.+3.42
This race's pollsAdmitted head-to-head polls of this race, recency- and quality-weighted.−2.49
National environmentThe national environment’s contribution to the prior. Polling can attenuate its influence; this value is not the national polling margin.+2.07
Other factors0.00

Where the votes are

The map of this race loads here.

Recent elections

ElectionResultVotes cast
2024 · U.S. House ↗D+1.7376,324
2022 · U.S. House ↗D+4.7257,776
2020 · U.S. House ↗D+8.4348,618
2018 · U.S. House ↗D+39.7272,675

Historical district boundaries may differ. Margins are the Democrat’s share of all votes cast minus the Republican’s.

The money

The tick marks cash on hand. A missing filing stays blank rather than becoming $0.

One more fundraising reportCall the Map · $325

The candidates are comfortably out-fundraising the website covering them. A little rude, perhaps, but statistically unsurprising.

Received so far
$325
Measured compute
$26,188.58

Ko-fi and Buy Me a Coffee supports are counted as each one arrives. Measured compute prices model runs at standard published API rates; it is not what I paid. Hosting, data and subscriptions, the domain and my own time are not counted. Donations buy gratitude, never a forecast adjustment.

Supporters are listed by first name and last initial; a username alone is shortened to its first eight characters. Want your full name shown? Say so in your message. Give privately, or leave the name blank, and you are listed as Anonymous, with the platform and date. Supporters who give a name may also be thanked by name in the newsletter.

Thank you to Tom H., ColoradoFlyer, Chris, EW, gbaileym…, True Independent, MT V., JBL, Erin G., Caroline M., Melanie, MKV and 7 more.

See the public support ledger →

Outside spending

Separate from what the campaigns raised

For and against Don Davis$4.2M

13 spending groups
GroupForAgainst
WITH HONOR FUND III, INC.$2.7M$0
Rolling Sea Action Fund$480K$0
NO GOING BACK PAC INC.$0$220K
HMP$145K$0
AB PAC$112K$0
Progressive Turnout Project$109K$0
National Association of Realtors Political Action Committee$101K$0
A STRONG INNOVATION ECONOMY REQUIRES STRONG IP PROTECTION$100K$0
RESTORATION OF AMERICA PAC$0$90K
CIVIC RENEWAL FUND INC.$0$29K
Community Change Voters$15K$0
Relentless PAC$13K$0
Neighbor Voices$2K$0

For and against Laurie Buckhout$4.6M

12 spending groups
GroupForAgainst
HMP$0$2.9M
AMERICAN MISSION$509K$0
AMERICAN MAJORITY ACTION PAC$349K$0
NO GOING BACK PAC INC.$202K$0
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER PAC$191K$0
CIVIC RENEWAL FUND INC.$149K$0
Eastern Carolina Conservatives Fund$91K$0
SPECIAL OPERATIONS FOR AMERICA$65K$0
WFW ACTION FUND INC$64K$0
1ST CONSERVATIVE FUND NC$0$42K
SEAL PAC SUPPORTING ELECTING AMERICAN LEADERS PAC$10K$0
NRA VICTORY FUND, INC.$4K$0

Includes primary spending. Opposition is recorded against its named target; no benefit to another candidate is assumed.

$730 in outside spending on earlier candidates.

No filing matched: Tom Bailey.

FEC filings · through 06/30/2026 · Definitions & method

Race context

2024 presidential vote here
416,845
2024 presidential margin
R+11.7between the two parties

Coverage

Forecast as of October 28, 2026: Call the Map currently has Don Davis ahead of Laurie Buckhout by D+3.0, with a 73 in 100 chance to win. The seat is currently held by a Democrat. That result would keep the seat with Democrats. The current poll average is D+3.7; 8 public polls are recorded.