Call
the Map
Forecast6 days out
← GovernorsNovember 3, 2026

Alaska · Governor

Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins has an 86.7% chance of winning after ranked-choice transfers. Projected final round: Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins 53.8, Bernadette Wilson 46.2 (of ballots still counting). In 16 in 100 simulations the final round is Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins against Dave Bronson instead.

Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins (D)87 in 10048.344.0–52.6
Bernadette Wilson (R)13 in 10025.915.2–35.7
Dave Bronson (R)1 in 10016.39.3–24.5
Show all others (1)
Treg Taylor (R)<1 in 1009.45.1–14.6

Final round, middle 80 in 100 simulations: Wilson by 2.0 to Kreiss-Tomkins by 16.8.

Under each share, its likely range (80 in 100 simulations) · shares are first-choice votes; winning chances include ranked-choice transfers

Background

Dunleavy is term-limited. The August 18 nonpartisan top-four primary has been held: on the state's unofficial returns Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins (21.7%) and Tom Begich (20.1%) finished first and second, alongside Bernadette Wilson (10.5%) and Dave Bronson (8.4%), with the twelve-candidate Republican field splitting its vote. Begich withdrew on August 29. Under Alaska Statute 15.25.100(f) a withdrawal more than 64 days before the general advances the next-highest vote total, so Treg Taylor (7.3%) takes the fourth place on the ballot. November is decided by ranked-choice voting among the four.

Likely DOpen seat

Forecast history

Steady+0.3 pts · Oct 26 → Oct 28Alaska Governor: steady — the published margin moved +0.3 points between the Oct 26 and Oct 28 editions (3 of 47 stored editions). This is movement of the published forecast between editions.
D+20D+10EVENJonathan Kreiss-Tomkins, Bernadette Wilson and Dave Bronson are forecast as candidates from this day; earlier readings are of the Democrat against the Republican alone. · Aug 22The candidate field changed: Tom Begich is no longer in it and Treg Taylor is in it. Readings before and after this day are not compared. · Aug 29Aug 1Nov 3 · Election Day

Latest reading · Oct 28 · first published Oct 6 · Lead on first choices, before ranked-choice transfers. Methodology

 

Aug 22: Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins, Bernadette Wilson and Dave Bronson are forecast as candidates from this day; earlier readings are of the Democrat against the Republican alone.

Aug 29: The candidate field changed: Tom Begich is no longer in it and Treg Taylor is in it. Readings before and after this day are not compared.

About this series

Reconstructed with the current model Aug 1 – Oct 5; published readings Oct 6 – Oct 28. Each reconstructed day is the current model on that day’s own inputs, not a forecast published then. Corrections are dated in the changelog.

Faded: CTMM 2.2 reconstructed history: computed after the fact with each date's available polls and environment, without expert ratings; not an issued forecast. Issued forecasts begin at the launch marker.

CTMM 2.2 readings for 2026-09-16, 2026-09-17, 2026-09-18 were computed after the fact with each day's available inputs: no edition was issued on those days. Not an issued forecast.

Data table
DateFirst-choice leadChanceReading
Oct 28D+22.4Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.7%Published forecast
Oct 27D+22.4Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.8%Published forecast
Oct 26D+22.1Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.1%Published forecast
Oct 25D+22.1Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.9%Published forecast
Oct 24D+22.1Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.0%Published forecast
Oct 23D+22.1Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.1%Published forecast
Oct 22D+22.0Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.9%Published forecast
Oct 21D+22.1Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.8%Published forecast
Oct 20D+23.4Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.3%Published forecast
Oct 19D+23.4Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.2%Published forecast
Oct 18D+23.4Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.5%Published forecast
Oct 17D+23.4Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.6%Published forecast
Oct 16D+23.3Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.3%Published forecast
Oct 15D+23.3Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.4%Published forecast
Oct 14D+23.3Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.3%Published forecast
Oct 13D+23.3Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.4%Published forecast
Oct 12D+23.3Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.3%Published forecast
Oct 11D+23.3Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.4%Published forecast
Oct 10D+23.3Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.6%Published forecast
Oct 9D+23.3Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.4%Published forecast
Oct 8D+23.3Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.5%Published forecast
Oct 7D+24.4Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 88.0%Published forecast
Oct 6D+24.3Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 87.9%Published forecast
Oct 5D+24.4Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 88.0%Recomputed with the current model
Oct 4D+24.4Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 88.0%Recomputed with the current model
Oct 3D+24.9Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 90.7%Recomputed with the current model
Oct 2D+25.0Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 91.0%Recomputed with the current model
Oct 1D+23.2Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.3%Recomputed with the current model
Sep 30D+23.1Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.3%Recomputed with the current model
Sep 29D+23.1Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.4%Recomputed with the current model
Sep 28D+23.2Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.2%Recomputed with the current model
Sep 27D+23.1Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.4%Recomputed with the current model
Sep 26D+23.2Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.5%Recomputed with the current model
Sep 25D+23.1Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.4%Recomputed with the current model
Sep 24D+23.2Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.2%Recomputed with the current model
Sep 23D+23.1Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.3%Recomputed with the current model
Sep 22D+23.1Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.2%Recomputed with the current model
Sep 21D+23.1Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.2%Recomputed with the current model
Sep 20D+23.1Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.4%Recomputed with the current model
Sep 19D+23.0Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.2%Recomputed with the current model
Sep 18D+23.6Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 87.8%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 17D+23.6Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 88.0%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 16D+23.5Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 88.3%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 15D+23.3Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 87.8%Recomputed with the current model
Sep 14D+23.3Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 88.4%Recomputed with the current model
Sep 13D+23.4Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 87.8%Recomputed with the current model
Sep 12D+23.4Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 88.1%Recomputed with the current model
Sep 11D+23.3Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 88.2%Recomputed with the current model
Sep 10D+23.2Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 88.2%Recomputed with the current model
Sep 9D+23.3Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 88.1%Recomputed with the current model
Sep 8D+23.3Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 87.9%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 7D+23.1Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 87.8%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 6D+23.2Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 88.0%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 5D+23.3Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 88.2%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 4D+23.3Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 88.0%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 3D+23.2Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 87.7%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 2D+23.0Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 88.1%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 1D+23.3Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 87.9%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 31D+23.2Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 87.6%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 30D+23.3Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 87.9%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 29D+23.0Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 87.8%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 28R+0.6Bernadette Wilson win 31.5%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 27R+0.6Bernadette Wilson win 31.3%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 26R+0.5Bernadette Wilson win 31.1%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 25R+2.5Bernadette Wilson win 41.4%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 24R+2.8Bernadette Wilson win 42.1%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 23R+2.9Bernadette Wilson win 42.4%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 22R+2.8Bernadette Wilson win 42.4%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 21R+5.9Click Bishop win 77.3%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 20R+5.9Click Bishop win 77.2%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 19R+5.8Click Bishop win 77.2%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 18R+5.8Click Bishop win 77.1%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 17R+5.8Click Bishop win 77.1%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 16R+5.8Click Bishop win 77.1%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 15R+5.8Click Bishop win 77.0%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 14R+5.9Click Bishop win 77.3%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 13R+5.9Click Bishop win 77.3%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 12R+5.9Click Bishop win 77.2%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 11R+5.9Click Bishop win 77.2%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 10R+5.9Click Bishop win 77.2%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 9R+5.9Click Bishop win 77.1%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 8R+5.9Click Bishop win 77.1%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 7R+5.9Click Bishop win 77.1%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 6R+6.0Click Bishop win 77.5%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 5R+6.0Click Bishop win 77.5%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 4R+6.0Click Bishop win 77.5%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 3R+6.0Click Bishop win 77.5%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 2R+6.0Click Bishop win 77.6%Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 1R+6.0Click Bishop win 77.5%Reconstructed with the stated inputs

The polls

Polling average, first choices · 8 polls · newer and larger polls count for more

Wilson, Bronson and Taylor: averaged over the 4 polls that reported each of them separately; the other 4 gave only a party’s total.

FieldworkAddedPollsterResultSample
from 2026-10-232d agoAlaska Survey Research ↗Kreiss-Tomkins 51%3 Republicans 50%First choices, by party1,068 LV
from 2026-10-08Data for Progress ↗First choices694 LV
from 2026-10-15Alaska Survey Research ↗Kreiss-Tomkins 50%3 Republicans 50%First choices, by party1,568 LV
from 2026-10-01Alaska Survey Research ↗Kreiss-Tomkins 48%3 Republicans 52%First choices, by party1,512 LV
from 2026-09-24The New York Times/Siena University ↗First choices504 LV
from 2026-09-24Cygnal (R) ↗Kreiss-Tomkins 44%3 Republicans 41%First choices, by party502 LV
from 2026-09-14co/efficient ↗First choices799 LV
from 2026-09-08Fabrizio Ward/Impact Research ↗AARPFirst choices800 LV
How the forecast uses these polls

Poll average, each party’s candidates added together Republicans combined +1.3Each poll here is read as party totals: every Democrat on the ballot added together against every Republican added together. It is not the gap between the two leading candidates.In a ranked-choice count a party total is not the final round: when a candidate is eliminated, not all of their ballots go to their party’s other candidates.A poll’s weight halves every 60 days and grows with its sample. Each pollster counts once, at its best release. Every poll counts at its published margin, sponsored or not.In governor races the forecast then counts a poll sponsored by a party or campaign at full weight and moves its margin 2 points against that party, which puts the average it reads at R+1.1. It then applies a fitted correction of 2.5 points toward Republicans for governor races, measured from past polling error, before blending it with its other evidence.10 recorded polls · 8 in the poll average

Weighted average, as the forecast took it: · 6 polls

Each poll’s figures are shares of the people who picked a candidate. Undecided voters are left out, so the numbers run a little higher than the poll’s own headline figures, and a candidate who has since left the race is not counted.

Explore all 10 polls for this race

How the candidate lead was built

Tap an input for its calculation and source.

Toward D+27.2
Toward R−4.9
Candidate leadD+22.3

Displayed values are rounded. This is the model coordinate before ranked-choice transfers.

Winning chances include ranked-choice transfers; this walk is on first choices, before them.

The two-party D-versus-R coordinate, step by step

The walk above decomposes the published candidate lead. The model also carries a latent Democrat-minus-Republican coordinate, which is the quantity chamber seat and control arithmetic runs on. It is shown here at the same steps as a secondary reading, not as this race’s published forecast margin.

After this stepD−R coordinate
FundamentalsR+6.5
National environmentR+4.7
Campaign financeR+4.7
This race’s pollsR+3.6
Election rules & guardsR+3.6
Historical calibrationR+3.4
The candidate fieldR+3.4
All calculations & sources

The candidate field +24.893 points

What the field itself contributes: the third principals on the ballot and the election rule, which a two-party coordinate has nowhere to put.

National environment +1.360 points

How much of the national climate reaches this race’s leader-versus-runner-up gap.

This race’s polls +0.796 points

What this race’s admitted polls move the leader-versus-runner-up gap by.

Historical calibration +0.151 points

The calibration term fitted on past cycles, carried onto this gap.

Fundamentals −4.852 points

What the fitted structural model contributes to the gap between the leader and the runner-up, before any of this cycle’s evidence.

These are the fitted model’s named contributions to the partisan coordinate, before the candidate-field calculation.

Named factorContribution
FundamentalsThe admitted fitted baseline. Its surviving variables differ by office; the source detail above identifies those used for this race.−6.54
National environmentThe national environment’s contribution to the prior. Polling can attenuate its influence; this value is not the national polling margin.+1.83
This race's pollsAdmitted head-to-head polls of this race, recency- and quality-weighted.+1.07
Historical calibrationThe House lane's calibration against certified past cycles.+0.20
Other factors0.00

Where the votes are

The map of this race loads here.

Race context

Turnout, 2018 midterm
51.2% 285,009 ballots
Turnout, 2022 midterm
50.3% 267,047 ballots
2024 presidential margin
R+13.7between the two parties

Turnout is ballots cast statewide as a share of the voting-eligible population. Source: University of Florida Election Lab ↗

Population profile

White alone · 61.3%450,472 of 734,821 · Residents2022 Census · matched race geography

Forecast as of October 28, 2026: Call the Map currently has Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins ahead of Bernadette Wilson, with an 87 in 100 chance of winning after ranked-choice transfers. Projected final round: Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins 53.8, Bernadette Wilson 46.2 (of ballots still counting). In 16 in 100 simulations the final round is Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins against Dave Bronson instead. This is an open seat. That result would flip the seat to Democrats. The forecast reads 6 polls that named every candidate in this race, listed under “The polls”. The current poll average of all Democrats against all Republicans is R+1.3; 8 public polls are recorded.