Call
the Map
FORECAST51 DAYS OUT
governor3 November 2026 · 51 days out

Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins has a 87.6% chance of winning after ranked-choice transfers. No final-round margin is published.

Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins (D)88 in 10087.6%49.2high 54.2 · low 44.3
Bernadette Wilson (R)9 in 1008.6%24.0high 38.1 · low 6.4
Dave Bronson (R)4 in 1003.6%17.8high 32.0 · low 7.0
Show all others (1)
Treg Taylor (R)<1 in 1000.3%8.9high 16.7 · low 3.1

high / low: vote share (%) in the middle 80 in 100 simulations · shares are first-choice votes; winning chances include ranked-choice transfers, not a published final-round margin

About this field

Dunleavy is term-limited. The August 18 nonpartisan top-four primary has been held: on the state's unofficial returns Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins (21.7%) and Tom Begich (20.1%) finished first and second, alongside Bernadette Wilson (10.5%) and Dave Bronson (8.4%), with the twelve-candidate Republican field splitting its vote. Begich withdrew on August 29. Under Alaska Statute 15.25.100(f) a withdrawal more than 64 days before the general advances the next-highest vote total, so Treg Taylor (7.3%) takes the fourth place on the ballot. Results are not yet certified, and November is decided by ranked-choice voting among the four.

Forecast share averages the simulated vote. Win chance counts how often a candidate wins. A wider range of outcomes can give a candidate a higher win chance despite a lower average share.

Solid DOpen seat

The polls

Ledger weighted average EVENUsed by the forecast: 1 poll (60-day half-life) · measured D+2.0 · after the fitted poll-error shift R+0.51 recorded poll · 1 eligible for the aggregate · 1 with positive weight

FieldworkAddedPollsterResultSample
from 2026-06-30Alaska Survey ResearchD+2.0D 51% · R 49%1,528 LV
Explore all 1 poll for this race

How the candidate lead was built

Follow each contribution to the margin. Wider ribbons mean more percentage points. Tap an input for its calculation and source.

Toward D+30.0
Toward R−4.8
Candidate leadD+25.2

The signed totals combine at the forecast. Displayed values are rounded. This is the model coordinate before ranked-choice transfers.

Winning chances include ranked-choice transfers. No final-round margin is published.

The two-party D-versus-R coordinate, step by step

The walk above decomposes the published candidate lead. The model also carries a latent Democrat-minus-Republican coordinate, which is the quantity chamber seat and control arithmetic runs on. It is shown here at the same steps, as a secondary reading — it is not this race’s published forecast margin.

After this stepD−R coordinate
FundamentalsR+6.5
National environmentR+5.4
Campaign financeR+5.4
This race’s pollsR+1.7
Expert ratingsR+1.7
Election rules & guardsR+1.7
Historical calibrationR+1.2
The candidate fieldR+1.2
All calculations & sources

The candidate field +26.095 points

What the field itself contributes: the third principals on the ballot and the election rule, which a two-party coordinate has nowhere to put.

This race’s polls +2.728 points

What this race’s admitted polls move the leader-versus-runner-up gap by.

National environment +0.837 points

How much of the national climate reaches this race’s leader-versus-runner-up gap.

Historical calibration +0.371 points

The calibration term fitted on past cycles, carried onto this gap.

Fundamentals −4.789 points

What the fitted structural model contributes to the gap between the leader and the runner-up, before any of this cycle’s evidence.

These are the fitted model’s named contributions to the partisan coordinate, before the candidate-field calculation.

Named factorContribution
FundamentalsThe admitted fitted baseline. Its surviving variables differ by office; the source detail above identifies those used for this race.−6.54
This race's pollsAdmitted head-to-head polls of this race, recency- and quality-weighted.+3.72
National environmentThe national environment’s contribution to the prior. Polling can attenuate its influence; this value is not the national polling margin.+1.14
Historical calibrationThe House lane's calibration against certified past cycles.+0.51
Other factors0.00

Race context

Forecast votes cast
259,668
Forecast turnout
47.8% of the voting-eligible population
2024 presidential margin
R+13.7

Statewide, 48.4% of the voting-eligible population is projected to cast a ballot; the lower figure above is the share projected to vote in this race.

Population profile Select a measure for its source and denominator

White alone · 61.3%450,472 of 734,821 · Residents2022 Census · matched race geography

Coverage