Alaska · Governor
Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins has an 86.7% chance of winning after ranked-choice transfers. Projected final round: Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins 53.8, Bernadette Wilson 46.2 (of ballots still counting). In 16 in 100 simulations the final round is Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins against Dave Bronson instead.
Show all others (1)
Final round, middle 80 in 100 simulations: Wilson by 2.0 to Kreiss-Tomkins by 16.8.
Under each share, its likely range (80 in 100 simulations) · shares are first-choice votes; winning chances include ranked-choice transfers
Background
Dunleavy is term-limited. The August 18 nonpartisan top-four primary has been held: on the state's unofficial returns Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins (21.7%) and Tom Begich (20.1%) finished first and second, alongside Bernadette Wilson (10.5%) and Dave Bronson (8.4%), with the twelve-candidate Republican field splitting its vote. Begich withdrew on August 29. Under Alaska Statute 15.25.100(f) a withdrawal more than 64 days before the general advances the next-highest vote total, so Treg Taylor (7.3%) takes the fourth place on the ballot. November is decided by ranked-choice voting among the four.
Forecast history
Latest reading · Oct 28 · first published Oct 6 · Lead on first choices, before ranked-choice transfers. Methodology
Aug 22: Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins, Bernadette Wilson and Dave Bronson are forecast as candidates from this day; earlier readings are of the Democrat against the Republican alone.
Aug 29: The candidate field changed: Tom Begich is no longer in it and Treg Taylor is in it. Readings before and after this day are not compared.
About this series
Reconstructed with the current model Aug 1 – Oct 5; published readings Oct 6 – Oct 28. Each reconstructed day is the current model on that day’s own inputs, not a forecast published then. Corrections are dated in the changelog.
Faded: CTMM 2.2 reconstructed history: computed after the fact with each date's available polls and environment, without expert ratings; not an issued forecast. Issued forecasts begin at the launch marker.
CTMM 2.2 readings for 2026-09-16, 2026-09-17, 2026-09-18 were computed after the fact with each day's available inputs: no edition was issued on those days. Not an issued forecast.
Data table
| Date | First-choice lead | Chance | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28 | D+22.4 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.7% | Published forecast |
| Oct 27 | D+22.4 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.8% | Published forecast |
| Oct 26 | D+22.1 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.1% | Published forecast |
| Oct 25 | D+22.1 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.9% | Published forecast |
| Oct 24 | D+22.1 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.0% | Published forecast |
| Oct 23 | D+22.1 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.1% | Published forecast |
| Oct 22 | D+22.0 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.9% | Published forecast |
| Oct 21 | D+22.1 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.8% | Published forecast |
| Oct 20 | D+23.4 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.3% | Published forecast |
| Oct 19 | D+23.4 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.2% | Published forecast |
| Oct 18 | D+23.4 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.5% | Published forecast |
| Oct 17 | D+23.4 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.6% | Published forecast |
| Oct 16 | D+23.3 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.3% | Published forecast |
| Oct 15 | D+23.3 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.4% | Published forecast |
| Oct 14 | D+23.3 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.3% | Published forecast |
| Oct 13 | D+23.3 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.4% | Published forecast |
| Oct 12 | D+23.3 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.3% | Published forecast |
| Oct 11 | D+23.3 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.4% | Published forecast |
| Oct 10 | D+23.3 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.6% | Published forecast |
| Oct 9 | D+23.3 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.4% | Published forecast |
| Oct 8 | D+23.3 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 85.5% | Published forecast |
| Oct 7 | D+24.4 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 88.0% | Published forecast |
| Oct 6 | D+24.3 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 87.9% | Published forecast |
| Oct 5 | D+24.4 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 88.0% | Recomputed with the current model |
| Oct 4 | D+24.4 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 88.0% | Recomputed with the current model |
| Oct 3 | D+24.9 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 90.7% | Recomputed with the current model |
| Oct 2 | D+25.0 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 91.0% | Recomputed with the current model |
| Oct 1 | D+23.2 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.3% | Recomputed with the current model |
| Sep 30 | D+23.1 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.3% | Recomputed with the current model |
| Sep 29 | D+23.1 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.4% | Recomputed with the current model |
| Sep 28 | D+23.2 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.2% | Recomputed with the current model |
| Sep 27 | D+23.1 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.4% | Recomputed with the current model |
| Sep 26 | D+23.2 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.5% | Recomputed with the current model |
| Sep 25 | D+23.1 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.4% | Recomputed with the current model |
| Sep 24 | D+23.2 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.2% | Recomputed with the current model |
| Sep 23 | D+23.1 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.3% | Recomputed with the current model |
| Sep 22 | D+23.1 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.2% | Recomputed with the current model |
| Sep 21 | D+23.1 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.2% | Recomputed with the current model |
| Sep 20 | D+23.1 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.4% | Recomputed with the current model |
| Sep 19 | D+23.0 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 86.2% | Recomputed with the current model |
| Sep 18 | D+23.6 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 87.8% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 17 | D+23.6 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 88.0% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 16 | D+23.5 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 88.3% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 15 | D+23.3 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 87.8% | Recomputed with the current model |
| Sep 14 | D+23.3 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 88.4% | Recomputed with the current model |
| Sep 13 | D+23.4 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 87.8% | Recomputed with the current model |
| Sep 12 | D+23.4 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 88.1% | Recomputed with the current model |
| Sep 11 | D+23.3 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 88.2% | Recomputed with the current model |
| Sep 10 | D+23.2 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 88.2% | Recomputed with the current model |
| Sep 9 | D+23.3 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 88.1% | Recomputed with the current model |
| Sep 8 | D+23.3 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 87.9% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 7 | D+23.1 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 87.8% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 6 | D+23.2 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 88.0% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 5 | D+23.3 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 88.2% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 4 | D+23.3 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 88.0% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 3 | D+23.2 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 87.7% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 2 | D+23.0 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 88.1% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 1 | D+23.3 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 87.9% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 31 | D+23.2 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 87.6% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 30 | D+23.3 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 87.9% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 29 | D+23.0 | Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins win 87.8% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 28 | R+0.6 | Bernadette Wilson win 31.5% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 27 | R+0.6 | Bernadette Wilson win 31.3% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 26 | R+0.5 | Bernadette Wilson win 31.1% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 25 | R+2.5 | Bernadette Wilson win 41.4% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 24 | R+2.8 | Bernadette Wilson win 42.1% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 23 | R+2.9 | Bernadette Wilson win 42.4% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 22 | R+2.8 | Bernadette Wilson win 42.4% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 21 | R+5.9 | Click Bishop win 77.3% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 20 | R+5.9 | Click Bishop win 77.2% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 19 | R+5.8 | Click Bishop win 77.2% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 18 | R+5.8 | Click Bishop win 77.1% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 17 | R+5.8 | Click Bishop win 77.1% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 16 | R+5.8 | Click Bishop win 77.1% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 15 | R+5.8 | Click Bishop win 77.0% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 14 | R+5.9 | Click Bishop win 77.3% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 13 | R+5.9 | Click Bishop win 77.3% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 12 | R+5.9 | Click Bishop win 77.2% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 11 | R+5.9 | Click Bishop win 77.2% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 10 | R+5.9 | Click Bishop win 77.2% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 9 | R+5.9 | Click Bishop win 77.1% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 8 | R+5.9 | Click Bishop win 77.1% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 7 | R+5.9 | Click Bishop win 77.1% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 6 | R+6.0 | Click Bishop win 77.5% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 5 | R+6.0 | Click Bishop win 77.5% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 4 | R+6.0 | Click Bishop win 77.5% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 3 | R+6.0 | Click Bishop win 77.5% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 2 | R+6.0 | Click Bishop win 77.6% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 1 | R+6.0 | Click Bishop win 77.5% | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
The polls
Polling average, first choices · 8 polls · newer and larger polls count for more
49.3Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins25.5Bernadette Wilson16.4Dave Bronson9.5Treg Taylor
Wilson, Bronson and Taylor: averaged over the 4 polls that reported each of them separately; the other 4 gave only a party’s total.
| Fieldwork | Added | Pollster | Result | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| from 2026-10-23 | 2d ago | Alaska Survey Research ↗ | Kreiss-Tomkins 51%3 Republicans 50%First choices, by party | 1,068 LV |
| from 2026-10-08 | Data for Progress ↗ | 48.4Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins29.5Bernadette Wilson12.6Dave Bronson9.5Treg TaylorFirst choices | 694 LV | |
| from 2026-10-15 | Alaska Survey Research ↗ | Kreiss-Tomkins 50%3 Republicans 50%First choices, by party | 1,568 LV | |
| from 2026-10-01 | Alaska Survey Research ↗ | Kreiss-Tomkins 48%3 Republicans 52%First choices, by party | 1,512 LV | |
| from 2026-09-24 | The New York Times/Siena University ↗ | 46.6Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins23.2Bernadette Wilson17.2Dave Bronson13.0Treg TaylorFirst choices | 504 LV | |
| from 2026-09-24 | Cygnal (R) ↗ | Kreiss-Tomkins 44%3 Republicans 41%First choices, by party | 502 LV | |
| from 2026-09-14 | co/efficient ↗ | 50.0Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins23.3Bernadette Wilson19.8Dave Bronson7.0Treg TaylorFirst choices | 799 LV | |
| from 2026-09-08 | Fabrizio Ward/Impact Research ↗AARP | 49.4Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins24.7Bernadette Wilson17.3Dave Bronson8.6Treg TaylorFirst choices | 800 LV |
How the forecast uses these polls
The polling average above is the polls’ own: every poll in this race’s poll average, newer and larger polls counting for more and each pollster once, with nothing adjusted. What the forecast does with the polls is a separate matter, set out here.
The forecast reads every poll as one party’s candidates against the other’s, and that, with past results and the national mood, sets the balance between the two parties. From the 6 polls above that named every candidate it also takes the share of Dave Bronson and Treg Taylor: Dave Bronson 16.4% and Treg Taylor 9.4%, a weighted average. Newer and larger polls count for more.
Some of these polls were taken before this ballot was settled on 2026-08-18, so the other candidates’ numbers are not taken from them. The Democratic and Republican totals come from the forecast’s Democrat-versus-Republican estimate, which is built from past results, the national mood and this race’s poll average. Each candidate named here takes their share out of their own party’s total, or out of both if they belong to neither party. The published result is Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins 48.3%, Bernadette Wilson 25.9%, Dave Bronson 16.3% and Treg Taylor 9.4%, a lead of 22.3 points for Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins. This race is decided by ranked-choice voting: these shares are first choices, and each candidate’s chance of winning comes from simulating the ranked count.
Poll average, each party’s candidates added together Republicans combined +1.3Each poll here is read as party totals: every Democrat on the ballot added together against every Republican added together. It is not the gap between the two leading candidates.In a ranked-choice count a party total is not the final round: when a candidate is eliminated, not all of their ballots go to their party’s other candidates.A poll’s weight halves every 60 days and grows with its sample. Each pollster counts once, at its best release. Every poll counts at its published margin, sponsored or not.In governor races the forecast then counts a poll sponsored by a party or campaign at full weight and moves its margin 2 points against that party, which puts the average it reads at R+1.1. It then applies a fitted correction of 2.5 points toward Republicans for governor races, measured from past polling error, before blending it with its other evidence.10 recorded polls · 8 in the poll average
Weighted average, as the forecast took it: 16.4Dave Bronson9.4Treg Taylor · 6 polls
Each poll’s figures are shares of the people who picked a candidate. Undecided voters are left out, so the numbers run a little higher than the poll’s own headline figures, and a candidate who has since left the race is not counted.
How the candidate lead was built
Tap an input for its calculation and source.
Displayed values are rounded. This is the model coordinate before ranked-choice transfers.
Winning chances include ranked-choice transfers; this walk is on first choices, before them.
The two-party D-versus-R coordinate, step by step
The walk above decomposes the published candidate lead. The model also carries a latent Democrat-minus-Republican coordinate, which is the quantity chamber seat and control arithmetic runs on. It is shown here at the same steps as a secondary reading, not as this race’s published forecast margin.
| After this step | D−R coordinate |
|---|---|
| Fundamentals | R+6.5 |
| National environment | R+4.7 |
| Campaign finance | R+4.7 |
| This race’s polls | R+3.6 |
| Election rules & guards | R+3.6 |
| Historical calibration | R+3.4 |
| The candidate field | R+3.4 |
All calculations & sources
The candidate field +24.893 points
What the field itself contributes: the third principals on the ballot and the election rule, which a two-party coordinate has nowhere to put.
National environment +1.360 points
How much of the national climate reaches this race’s leader-versus-runner-up gap.
This race’s polls +0.796 points
What this race’s admitted polls move the leader-versus-runner-up gap by.
Historical calibration +0.151 points
The calibration term fitted on past cycles, carried onto this gap.
Fundamentals −4.852 points
What the fitted structural model contributes to the gap between the leader and the runner-up, before any of this cycle’s evidence.
These are the fitted model’s named contributions to the partisan coordinate, before the candidate-field calculation.
| Named factor | Contribution |
|---|---|
| FundamentalsThe admitted fitted baseline. Its surviving variables differ by office; the source detail above identifies those used for this race. | −6.54 |
| National environmentThe national environment’s contribution to the prior. Polling can attenuate its influence; this value is not the national polling margin. | +1.83 |
| This race's pollsAdmitted head-to-head polls of this race, recency- and quality-weighted. | +1.07 |
| Historical calibrationThe House lane's calibration against certified past cycles. | +0.20 |
| Other factors | 0.00 |
Where the votes are
The map of this race loads here.
Race context
- Turnout, 2018 midterm
- 51.2% 285,009 ballots
- Turnout, 2022 midterm
- 50.3% 267,047 ballots
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+13.7between the two parties
Turnout is ballots cast statewide as a share of the voting-eligible population. Source: University of Florida Election Lab ↗
Population profile
U.S. Census Bureau, 2022 American Community Survey 5-year estimates ↗
Forecast as of October 28, 2026: Call the Map currently has Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins ahead of Bernadette Wilson, with an 87 in 100 chance of winning after ranked-choice transfers. Projected final round: Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins 53.8, Bernadette Wilson 46.2 (of ballots still counting). In 16 in 100 simulations the final round is Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins against Dave Bronson instead. This is an open seat. That result would flip the seat to Democrats. The forecast reads 6 polls that named every candidate in this race, listed under “The polls”. The current poll average of all Democrats against all Republicans is R+1.3; 8 public polls are recorded.