Wisconsin · Governor
David Crowley is favored to keep the Wisconsin governorship in Democratic hands. Predicted margin: D+2.6.
Under each share, its likely range (80 in 100 simulations)
Background
Open after Evers retired. Both nominations were settled at the August 11 primary: David Crowley for the Democrats and Tom Tiffany for the Republicans. Francesca Hong, Joel Brennan and Kelda Roys were eliminated in the Democratic primary; Sara Rodriguez withdrew July 17.
Forecast history
Latest reading · Oct 28 · first published Sep 9 · 80% range · margin points R+5.7 to D+10.9. Methodology
About this series
Reconstructed with the current model Aug 1 – Sep 8 and Sep 16 – Sep 18; published readings Sep 9 – Oct 28. Each reconstructed day is the current model on that day’s own inputs, not a forecast published then. Corrections are dated in the changelog.
Faded: CTMM 2.2 reconstructed history: computed after the fact with each date's available polls and environment, without expert ratings; not an issued forecast. Issued forecasts begin at the launch marker.
CTMM 2.2 readings for 2026-09-16, 2026-09-17, 2026-09-18 were computed after the fact with each day's available inputs: no edition was issued on those days. Not an issued forecast.
Data table
| Date | Margin | Chance | 80% range | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28 | D+2.6 | D win 66.2% | R+5.7 to D+10.9 | Published forecast |
| Oct 27 | D+2.0 | D win 62.3% | R+6.5 to D+10.4 | Published forecast |
| Oct 26 | D+2.0 | D win 62.3% | R+6.5 to D+10.4 | Published forecast |
| Oct 25 | D+2.0 | D win 62.3% | R+6.5 to D+10.4 | Published forecast |
| Oct 24 | D+2.0 | D win 62.3% | R+6.5 to D+10.4 | Published forecast |
| Oct 23 | D+2.0 | D win 62.3% | R+6.5 to D+10.4 | Published forecast |
| Oct 22 | D+2.0 | D win 62.3% | R+6.5 to D+10.4 | Published forecast |
| Oct 21 | D+2.0 | D win 62.3% | R+6.5 to D+10.4 | Published forecast |
| Oct 20 | D+1.9 | D win 62.3% | R+6.5 to D+10.4 | Published forecast |
| Oct 19 | D+1.9 | D win 62.3% | R+6.5 to D+10.4 | Published forecast |
| Oct 18 | D+1.9 | D win 62.3% | R+6.5 to D+10.4 | Published forecast |
| Oct 17 | D+1.9 | D win 62.3% | R+6.5 to D+10.4 | Published forecast |
| Oct 16 | D+1.8 | D win 60.8% | R+6.8 to D+10.4 | Published forecast |
| Oct 15 | D+1.8 | D win 60.8% | R+6.8 to D+10.4 | Published forecast |
| Oct 14 | D+1.8 | D win 60.8% | R+6.8 to D+10.4 | Published forecast |
| Oct 13 | D+1.8 | D win 60.8% | R+6.8 to D+10.4 | Published forecast |
| Oct 12 | D+1.8 | D win 60.8% | R+6.8 to D+10.4 | Published forecast |
| Oct 11 | D+1.8 | D win 60.8% | R+6.8 to D+10.4 | Published forecast |
| Oct 10 | D+1.8 | D win 60.8% | R+6.8 to D+10.4 | Published forecast |
| Oct 9 | D+1.8 | D win 60.8% | R+6.8 to D+10.4 | Published forecast |
| Oct 8 | D+1.9 | D win 61.4% | R+6.9 to D+10.7 | Published forecast |
| Oct 7 | D+1.9 | D win 61.3% | R+6.9 to D+10.7 | Published forecast |
| Oct 6 | D+1.9 | D win 61.2% | R+6.9 to D+10.7 | Published forecast |
| Oct 5 | D+1.9 | D win 60.9% | R+6.9 to D+10.6 | Published forecast |
| Oct 4 | D+1.9 | D win 60.9% | R+6.9 to D+10.6 | Published forecast |
| Oct 3 | D+1.9 | D win 60.9% | R+6.9 to D+10.6 | Published forecast |
| Oct 2 | D+1.9 | D win 61.2% | R+6.9 to D+10.6 | Published forecast |
| Oct 1 | D+1.9 | D win 60.7% | R+6.9 to D+10.6 | Published forecast |
| Sep 30 | D+2.1 | D win 62.3% | R+6.7 to D+10.9 | Published forecast |
| Sep 29 | D+2.1 | D win 62.0% | R+6.7 to D+10.9 | Published forecast |
| Sep 28 | D+2.1 | D win 62.4% | R+6.7 to D+10.9 | Published forecast |
| Sep 27 | D+2.1 | D win 62.5% | R+6.7 to D+10.9 | Published forecast |
| Sep 26 | D+2.1 | D win 61.7% | R+6.7 to D+10.9 | Published forecast |
| Sep 25 | D+2.1 | D win 62.4% | R+6.7 to D+10.9 | Published forecast |
| Sep 24 | D+2.1 | D win 62.0% | R+6.7 to D+10.9 | Published forecast |
| Sep 23 | D+2.1 | D win 61.9% | R+6.7 to D+10.9 | Published forecast |
| Sep 22 | D+2.1 | D win 61.7% | R+6.8 to D+10.9 | Published forecast |
| Sep 21 | D+2.1 | D win 61.7% | R+6.8 to D+10.9 | Published forecast |
| Sep 20 | D+2.1 | D win 62.0% | R+6.8 to D+10.9 | Published forecast |
| Sep 19 | D+2.1 | D win 61.8% | R+6.8 to D+10.9 | Published forecast |
| Sep 18 | D+2.1 | D win 62.3% | R+6.7 to D+10.9 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 17 | D+2.1 | D win 62.3% | R+6.8 to D+10.9 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 16 | D+2.0 | D win 62.4% | R+6.8 to D+10.9 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 15 | D+2.0 | D win 61.5% | R+6.8 to D+10.8 | Published forecast |
| Sep 14 | D+2.0 | D win 61.7% | R+6.8 to D+10.8 | Published forecast |
| Sep 13 | D+2.0 | D win 61.4% | R+6.8 to D+10.8 | Published forecast |
| Sep 12 | D+2.0 | D win 61.6% | R+6.8 to D+10.8 | Published forecast |
| Sep 11 | D+2.0 | D win 61.6% | R+6.8 to D+10.8 | Published forecast |
| Sep 10 | D+2.0 | D win 61.4% | R+6.8 to D+10.8 | Published forecast |
| Sep 9 | D+1.6 | D win 59.3% | R+7.2 to D+10.4 | Published forecast |
| Sep 8 | D+2.0 | D win 61.9% | R+6.8 to D+10.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 7 | D+1.9 | D win 61.8% | R+6.9 to D+10.7 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 6 | D+1.9 | D win 61.8% | R+6.9 to D+10.7 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 5 | D+2.1 | D win 63.1% | R+6.5 to D+10.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 4 | D+2.1 | D win 63.0% | R+6.6 to D+10.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 3 | D+2.1 | D win 63.0% | R+6.6 to D+10.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 2 | D+2.1 | D win 63.0% | R+6.6 to D+10.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 1 | D+2.2 | D win 63.4% | R+6.5 to D+10.9 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 31 | D+2.2 | D win 63.4% | R+6.5 to D+10.9 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 30 | D+2.2 | D win 63.4% | R+6.5 to D+10.9 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 29 | D+2.2 | D win 63.4% | R+6.5 to D+10.9 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 28 | D+2.2 | D win 63.4% | R+6.5 to D+10.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 27 | D+2.2 | D win 63.4% | R+6.5 to D+10.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 26 | D+2.0 | D win 62.1% | R+6.8 to D+10.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 25 | D+1.7 | D win 60.5% | R+7.2 to D+10.7 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 24 | D+1.7 | D win 60.4% | R+7.2 to D+10.6 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 23 | D+1.4 | D win 58.9% | R+7.5 to D+10.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 22 | D+1.8 | D win 60.8% | R+7.2 to D+10.7 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 21 | D+1.3 | D win 57.1% | R+7.5 to D+10.1 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 20 | D+0.9 | D win 54.5% | R+8.1 to D+9.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 19 | D+0.9 | D win 54.5% | R+8.1 to D+9.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 18 | D+0.9 | D win 54.5% | R+8.1 to D+9.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 17 | D+0.9 | D win 54.5% | R+8.1 to D+9.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 16 | D+0.9 | D win 54.5% | R+8.1 to D+9.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 15 | D+0.1 | D win 49.8% | R+9.0 to D+9.2 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 14 | D+0.1 | D win 49.7% | R+9.0 to D+9.2 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 13 | D+0.4 | D win 51.3% | R+8.9 to D+9.7 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 12 | D+0.4 | D win 51.4% | R+8.9 to D+9.7 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 11 | D+1.2 | D win 55.6% | R+8.5 to D+10.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 10 | D+1.2 | D win 55.5% | R+8.5 to D+10.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 9 | D+1.2 | D win 55.5% | R+8.5 to D+10.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 8 | D+1.2 | D win 55.5% | R+8.5 to D+10.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 7 | D+1.2 | D win 55.5% | R+8.5 to D+10.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 6 | D+1.1 | D win 55.3% | R+8.5 to D+10.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 5 | D+1.1 | D win 55.3% | R+8.5 to D+10.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 4 | D+1.1 | D win 55.3% | R+8.5 to D+10.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 3 | D+1.1 | D win 55.3% | R+8.5 to D+10.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 2 | D+1.1 | D win 55.2% | R+8.5 to D+10.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 1 | D+1.1 | D win 55.2% | R+8.5 to D+10.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
The polls
Poll average D+3.9A poll’s weight halves every 60 days and grows with its sample. Each pollster counts once, at its best release. Every poll counts at its published margin, sponsored or not.In governor races the forecast then counts a poll sponsored by a party or campaign at full weight and moves its margin 2 points against that party, which puts the average it reads at D+4.2. It then applies a fitted correction of 2.5 points toward Republicans for governor races, measured from past polling error, before blending it with its other evidence.11 recorded polls · 11 in the poll average
| Fieldwork | Added | Pollster | Result | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| from 2026-10-19 | 1h ago | Wick ↗ | D+3.1D 47.7% · R 44.6% | 1,213 LV |
| from 2026-10-14 | 8h ago | Marquette University Law School ↗ | D+7.0D 53% · R 46% | 668 LV |
| from 2026-09-22 | YouGov ↗ | D+4.0D 46% · R 42% | 1,715 RV | |
| from 2026-09-28 | Z to A Research ↗Rust Belt Rising | D+5.0D 49% · R 44% | 662 LV | |
| from 2026-09-16 | Marquette University Law School ↗ | D+3.0D 49% · R 46% | 692 LV | |
| from 2026-08-14 | TIPP Insights ↗League of American Workers | D+3.4D 46.74% · R 43.39% | 1,187 LV | |
| from 2026-03-13 | TIPP Insights ↗League of American Workers | D+1.5D 42.34% · R 40.84% | 1,168 LV | |
| from 2026-08-12 | Marquette University Law School ↗ | D+5.0D 49% · R 44% | 738 LV |
Explore each poll’s weight in the average
Poll average D+3.9
- Published result
- D+3.1
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.89 · 22% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 19 Oct–23 Oct
- Sample
- 1,213 LV
- Sponsor
- Republican sponsor · organization not listed
- Published result
- D+7.0
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.66 · 7.2% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 14 Oct–22 Oct
- Sample
- 668 LV
- Sponsor
- Not listed
- Published result
- D+4.0
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.80 · 20% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 22 Sep–9 Oct
- Sample
- 1,715 RV
- Sponsor
- Not listed
- Published result
- D+5.0
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.51 · 13% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 28 Sep–1 Oct
- Sample
- 662 LV
- Sponsor
- Rust Belt Rising
- Published result
- D+3.0
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.48 · 5.2% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 16 Sep–23 Sep
- Sample
- 692 LV
- Sponsor
- Not listed
- Published result
- D+5.0
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.33 · 3.7% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 12 Aug–20 Aug
- Sample
- 738 LV
- Sponsor
- Not listed
- Published result
- D+3.4
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.41 · 8.7% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 14 Aug–18 Aug
- Sample
- 1,187 LV
- Sponsor
- League of American Workers
- Published result
- D+4.0
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.25 · 6.2% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 12 Aug–13 Aug
- Sample
- 500 LV
- Sponsor
- Badger Battleground Poll
How the margin was built
Tap an input for its calculation and source.
Displayed values are rounded.
All calculations & sources
How this state voted, 2024 −0.860 points
The state's presidential margin in 2024 as a share of all votes cast, from our own county sums — the same measurement the model's statewide terrain center is built from. Every pull below is measured from here, not from EVEN, which is why a landslide seat's listed pulls are small numbers and still land where the forecast does.
- 2024 presidential result for this state, as a share of all votes cast, from Call the Map's own county sums.
- Same source as Act I's 2024-president reference mark, so the origin lands on it.
National environment +1.832 points
The contribution to this race’s margin, not the national polling margin itself. The race’s loading, reference level and polling blend determine how much of the national climate reaches its final forecast.
- The national environment in this edition is D+8.4. This row is its contribution to the race’s prior, not a claim that the country is D+1.8.
- This step’s recorded contribution to the margin is +1.8.
- Polls receive 98.1% of the blend. They attenuate this contribution to +0.1 in the final center; the offset is included in the polling row.
- The elasticity is fitted on the pooled panel of contested governor races (2010–2024) with cycle-clustered standard errors; it is a measured response to the national environment, not a judgment floor.
Historical error calibration +1.014 points
A prior-election residual correction, when an admitted model publishes one.
- The forecast’s calibration against past governor results. The recorded contribution is +1.0.
This race’s polls +0.564 points
What this race’s own recent polling adds beyond its prior. The forecast weights each poll for recency and sample size and counts each pollster once; the weights listed here are those of the polls’ own average.
- Wick (2026-10-23, n=1,213): D+3.1 · weight 0.89 in the poll average
- Marquette University Law School (2026-10-22, n=668): D+7.0 · weight 0.66 in the poll average
- YouGov (2026-10-09, n=1,715): D+4.0 · weight 0.80 in the poll average
- Z to A Research (2026-10-01, n=662): D+5.0 · weight 0.51 in the poll average
- Marquette University Law School (2026-09-23, n=692): D+3.0 · weight 0.48 in the poll average
- Marquette University Law School (2026-08-20, n=738): D+5.0 · weight 0.33 in the poll average
- … and 5 more below.
- Poll average D+3.9, from 11 polls · 11 recorded polls. This is the polls’ own average, each poll at its published margin, the figure this page’s poll summary shows. In governor races the forecast then counts a poll sponsored by a party or campaign at full weight and moves its margin 2 points against that party, which puts the average it reads at D+4.2. It then applies a fitted correction of 2.5 points toward Republicans for governor races, measured from past polling error, before blending it with its other evidence. The forecast gives the polls 98% of the weight against its structural prior for this race, which moves the margin 0.6 points away from Republicans from where it stood before the polls. Eligible polls: latest poll: 2026-10-23 (5 days old).
Fitted model, above the terrain shown +0.077 points
What the fitted model adds on top of the starting terrain above — incumbency, past results, campaign finance and the other fitted terms — measured from that terrain rather than from EVEN. It is a comparison with the starting point already shown, not a separate input. The source detail lists the variables the fit uses.
- Fitted baseline -0.783 minus starting point -0.860 = 0.077 points.
- Fitted intercept: -6.136 points.
- 2010 White population share used by the frozen historical fit: observed input 86.188. -0.503 × ((86.188 − 77.922) / 12.864) = -0.323 points.
- gov_midterm_wh: observed input -1.000. -0.987 × ((-1.000 − 0.336) / 0.739) = 1.785 points.
- 2024 presidential lean relative to the national result: observed input 0.627. 4.163 × ((0.627 − -4.415) / 20.258) = 1.036 points.
- Previous governor election margin: observed input 3.400. 1.755 × ((3.400 − -3.131) / 19.227) = 0.596 points.
- gov_inc_running_signed: observed input 0.000. 2.531 × ((0.000 − -0.120) / 0.708) = 0.428 points.
- gov_inc_tenure_signed: observed input 0.000. 3.340 × ((0.000 − -0.143) / 0.902) = 0.529 points.
- The displayed arithmetic is rounded; the fitted terms use full precision. The intercept plus these five terms gives the non-ratings baseline.
- No source-verified current Gallup reading supports the former 40% / July 2026 claim. The current Gallup series ends in 2025; the Presidency Project identifies its 2026 observations as other pollsters. Use the unchanged fitted missing-value rule, not a replacement polling scale.
- Certified 2024 presidential baseline: state R+0.9, national R+1.5; subtracting the national margin gives relative lean +0.6. Source: FEC compilation of certified state results.
Votes for other candidates −0.032 points
Every step above is measured between the two major-party candidates alone, as if nobody else were on the ballot. The forecast sets 1.2% of the vote aside for other candidates and write-ins, so as a share of every vote cast the gap between the two is smaller by that much. This step is exactly that: the two-party margin times the share going to other candidates. It is the same arithmetic that turns the two-party margin into the two shares printed at the top of the page.
The components this edition publishes for this race, in points. “Other factors” closes the sum to the two-party structural lean exactly. The margin the page prints is a share of every vote cast, so the “Votes for other candidates” row carries the exact difference between the two-party lean and that margin; with it, the walk sums to the printed margin exactly.
| Named factor | Contribution |
|---|---|
| National environmentThe national environment’s contribution to the prior. Polling can attenuate its influence; this value is not the national polling margin. | +1.83 |
| Historical calibrationThe House lane's calibration against certified past cycles. | +1.01 |
| FundamentalsThe admitted fitted baseline. Its surviving variables differ by office; the source detail above identifies those used for this race. | −0.78 |
| This race's pollsAdmitted head-to-head polls of this race, recency- and quality-weighted. | +0.56 |
| Other factors | 0.00 |
Where the votes are
The map of this race loads here.
Race context
- Turnout, 2018 midterm
- 60.9% 2,675,000 ballots
- Turnout, 2022 midterm
- 60.2% 2,673,154 ballots
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+0.9between the two parties
Turnout is ballots cast statewide as a share of the voting-eligible population. Source: University of Florida Election Lab ↗
Population profile
U.S. Census Bureau, 2022 American Community Survey 5-year estimates ↗
Coverage
3 quotes
- Republican Tom Tiffany winds up campaign with a focus on blocking trans rights. Via @bspears.bsky.social.
buff.ly/nq8V7KF ↗
Wisconsin Examiner · Official · 2d ago
curated state newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match - Georgia Sen. Raphael Warnock came to Wisconsin Friday to campaign with gubernatorial candidate David Crowley via @rconniff.bsky.social wisconsinexaminer.com/2026/10/24/c... ↗
Wisconsin Examiner · Official · 4d ago
curated state newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match - Wisconsin’s next governor will shape the state’s approach to taxes, abortion, private school vouchers and more. Democrat David Crowley and Republican Tom Tiffany faced off tonight in their only televised debate before the Nov. 3 election.
Read more: wisconsinwatch.org/2026/10/davi... ↗
Wisconsin Watch · Official · 6d ago
curated state newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match
Forecast as of October 28, 2026: Call the Map currently has David Crowley ahead of Tom Tiffany by D+2.6, with a 66 in 100 chance to win. This is an open seat. That result would keep the seat with Democrats. The current poll average is D+3.9; 11 public polls are recorded.