Call
the Map
Forecast6 days out
← GovernorsNovember 3, 2026

Vermont · Governor

Phil Scott is heavily favored to hold the Vermont governorship. Predicted margin: R+7.3.

Amanda Janoo (D)11 in 10044.040.3–47.7
Phil Scott incumbent (R)89 in 10051.347.6–55.0

Under each share, its likely range (80 in 100 simulations) · * incumbent

Background

The nation's most popular governor — a Republican winning a deep-blue state on brand alone.

Likely RRepublican-held seat

Forecast history

Steady+0.4 pts · Oct 26 → Oct 28Vermont Governor: steady — the published margin moved +0.4 points between the Oct 26 and Oct 28 editions (3 of 47 stored editions). This is movement of the published forecast between editions.
R+10R+20Aug 1Nov 3 · Election Day

Latest reading · Oct 28 · first published Sep 9 · 80% range · margin points R+14.7 to EVEN. Methodology

 

About this series

Reconstructed with the current model Aug 1 – Sep 8 and Sep 16 – Sep 18; published readings Sep 9 – Oct 28. Each reconstructed day is the current model on that day’s own inputs, not a forecast published then. Corrections are dated in the changelog.

Faded: CTMM 2.2 reconstructed history: computed after the fact with each date's available polls and environment, without expert ratings; not an issued forecast. Issued forecasts begin at the launch marker.

CTMM 2.2 readings for 2026-09-16, 2026-09-17, 2026-09-18 were computed after the fact with each day's available inputs: no edition was issued on those days. Not an issued forecast.

Data table
DateMarginChance80% rangeReading
Oct 28R+7.3R win 89.4%R+14.7 to EVENPublished forecast
Oct 27R+7.7R win 90.3%R+15.1 to R+0.2Published forecast
Oct 26R+7.8R win 90.4%R+15.2 to R+0.3Published forecast
Oct 25R+7.8R win 90.6%R+15.3 to R+0.4Published forecast
Oct 24R+7.9R win 90.7%R+15.3 to R+0.4Published forecast
Oct 23R+7.9R win 90.8%R+15.4 to R+0.5Published forecast
Oct 22R+8.0R win 90.9%R+15.4 to R+0.5Published forecast
Oct 21R+8.1R win 91.1%R+15.5 to R+0.6Published forecast
Oct 20R+8.1R win 91.2%R+15.6 to R+0.7Published forecast
Oct 19R+8.2R win 91.4%R+15.6 to R+0.7Published forecast
Oct 18R+8.2R win 91.5%R+15.7 to R+0.8Published forecast
Oct 17R+8.3R win 91.7%R+15.7 to R+0.8Published forecast
Oct 16R+8.3R win 91.9%R+15.8 to R+0.9Published forecast
Oct 15R+8.4R win 92.0%R+15.9 to R+1.0Published forecast
Oct 14R+8.5R win 92.1%R+15.9 to R+1.0Published forecast
Oct 13R+8.5R win 92.3%R+16.0 to R+1.1Published forecast
Oct 12R+8.7R win 92.5%R+16.1 to R+1.2Published forecast
Oct 11R+8.7R win 92.5%R+16.1 to R+1.2Published forecast
Oct 10R+8.7R win 92.7%R+16.2 to R+1.3Published forecast
Oct 9R+8.8R win 92.8%R+16.2 to R+1.3Published forecast
Oct 8R+8.8R win 92.9%R+16.3 to R+1.4Published forecast
Oct 7R+10.0R win 94.5%R+17.7 to R+2.3Published forecast
Oct 6R+10.1R win 94.6%R+17.8 to R+2.4Published forecast
Oct 5R+10.1R win 94.7%R+17.8 to R+2.5Published forecast
Oct 4R+10.2R win 94.9%R+17.9 to R+2.5Published forecast
Oct 3R+10.3R win 94.8%R+17.9 to R+2.6Published forecast
Oct 2R+10.3R win 95.0%R+18.0 to R+2.6Published forecast
Oct 1R+10.4R win 95.0%R+18.1 to R+2.7Published forecast
Sep 30R+10.4R win 95.2%R+18.1 to R+2.8Published forecast
Sep 29R+10.5R win 95.2%R+18.2 to R+2.8Published forecast
Sep 28R+7.7R win 89.2%R+15.6 to D+0.3Published forecast
Sep 27R+7.8R win 89.2%R+15.7 to D+0.2Published forecast
Sep 26R+7.8R win 89.5%R+15.7 to D+0.2Published forecast
Sep 25R+7.8R win 89.3%R+15.8 to D+0.1Published forecast
Sep 24R+19.0R win 98.8%R+27.3 to R+10.8Published forecast
Sep 23R+19.1R win 98.7%R+27.3 to R+10.8Published forecast
Sep 22R+19.1R win 98.7%R+27.3 to R+10.9Published forecast
Sep 21R+19.1R win 98.7%R+27.3 to R+10.9Published forecast
Sep 20R+19.1R win 98.7%R+27.3 to R+10.9Published forecast
Sep 19R+19.1R win 98.7%R+27.3 to R+10.9Published forecast
Sep 18R+19.1R win 98.8%R+27.3 to R+10.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 17R+19.1R win 98.8%R+27.4 to R+10.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 16R+19.1R win 98.8%R+27.4 to R+10.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 15R+19.2R win 98.7%R+27.5 to R+11.0Published forecast
Sep 14R+19.2R win 98.7%R+27.5 to R+10.9Published forecast
Sep 13R+19.2R win 98.7%R+27.5 to R+10.9Published forecast
Sep 12R+19.2R win 98.7%R+27.5 to R+11.0Published forecast
Sep 11R+19.2R win 98.7%R+27.5 to R+11.0Published forecast
Sep 10R+19.3R win 98.7%R+27.5 to R+11.0Published forecast
Sep 9R+24.6R win 99.1%R+32.9 to R+16.2Published forecast
Sep 8R+19.3R win 98.8%R+27.6 to R+11.1Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 7R+19.4R win 98.8%R+27.6 to R+11.1Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 6R+19.4R win 98.8%R+27.7 to R+11.1Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 5R+19.4R win 98.8%R+27.7 to R+11.1Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 4R+19.4R win 98.8%R+27.7 to R+11.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 3R+19.5R win 98.8%R+27.7 to R+11.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 2R+19.5R win 98.8%R+27.8 to R+11.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 1R+19.5R win 98.8%R+27.8 to R+11.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 31R+19.5R win 98.8%R+27.8 to R+11.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 30R+19.5R win 98.9%R+27.8 to R+11.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 29R+19.5R win 98.9%R+27.8 to R+11.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 28R+19.6R win 98.9%R+27.8 to R+11.3Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 27R+19.6R win 98.9%R+27.9 to R+11.3Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 26R+19.6R win 98.9%R+27.9 to R+11.3Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 25R+19.6R win 98.9%R+27.9 to R+11.3Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 24R+19.7R win 98.9%R+28.0 to R+11.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 23R+19.7R win 98.9%R+28.0 to R+11.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 22R+19.7R win 98.9%R+28.0 to R+11.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 21R+19.7R win 98.8%R+28.0 to R+11.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 20R+19.8R win 98.8%R+28.1 to R+11.5Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 19R+19.8R win 98.8%R+28.1 to R+11.5Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 18R+19.8R win 98.8%R+28.1 to R+11.5Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 17R+19.8R win 98.8%R+28.2 to R+11.5Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 16R+19.9R win 98.8%R+28.2 to R+11.6Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 15R+19.9R win 98.8%R+28.2 to R+11.6Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 14R+19.9R win 98.8%R+28.3 to R+11.6Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 13R+20.0R win 98.8%R+28.3 to R+11.7Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 12R+20.0R win 98.8%R+28.3 to R+11.7Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 11R+20.0R win 98.8%R+28.4 to R+11.7Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 10R+20.1R win 98.8%R+28.4 to R+11.7Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 9R+20.1R win 98.8%R+28.4 to R+11.8Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 8R+20.1R win 98.8%R+28.4 to R+11.8Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 7R+20.1R win 98.8%R+28.5 to R+11.8Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 6R+20.2R win 98.8%R+28.5 to R+11.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 5R+20.2R win 98.8%R+28.6 to R+11.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 4R+20.3R win 98.8%R+28.6 to R+11.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 3R+20.3R win 98.8%R+28.6 to R+12.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 2R+20.3R win 98.8%R+28.7 to R+12.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 1R+20.4R win 98.8%R+28.7 to R+12.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs

The polls

Poll average R+4.5A poll’s weight halves every 60 days and grows with its sample. Each pollster counts once, at its best release. Every poll counts at its published margin, sponsored or not.In governor races the forecast then counts a poll sponsored by a party or campaign at full weight and moves its margin 2 points against that party, which leaves the average it reads the same for this race. It then applies a fitted correction of 2.5 points toward Republicans for governor races, measured from past polling error, before blending it with its other evidence.6 recorded polls · 6 in the poll average

FieldworkAddedPollsterResultSample
from 2026-10-231d agoState Navigate ↗R+3.0D 46% · R 49%1,752 LV
from 2026-10-02State Navigate ↗R+3.0D 43% · R 46%948 LV
from 2026-09-10Braun Research ↗Vermont Public RadioR+9.3D 34.43% · R 43.73%732 LV
from 2026-09-17University of New Hampshire ↗D+6.0D 49% · R 43%829 LV
from 2026-07-15University of New Hampshire ↗R+11.0D 33% · R 44%925 LV
from 2026-06-18University of New Hampshire ↗R+15.0D 27% · R 42%867 LV
Explore each poll’s weight in the average

6 of 6 matching · 6 total

Poll average R+4.5

State Navigate25 Oct · 1,752 LV · added 27 Oct
State Navigate4 Oct · 948 LV · added 7 Oct
Braun Research21 Sep · 732 LV · added 28 Sep
University of New Hampshire21 Sep · 829 LV · added 24 Sep
University of New Hampshire20 Jul · 925 LV · added 1 Sep
University of New Hampshire23 Jun · 867 LV · added 1 Sep
Explore all 6 polls for this race

How the margin was built

Tap an input for its calculation and source.

Toward D+49.8
Toward R−57.1
Forecast marginR+7.3

Displayed values are rounded.

All calculations & sources

How this state voted, 2024 +31.770 points

The state's presidential margin in 2024 as a share of all votes cast, from our own county sums — the same measurement the model's statewide terrain center is built from. Every pull below is measured from here, not from EVEN, which is why a landslide seat's listed pulls are small numbers and still land where the forecast does.

  • 2024 presidential result for this state, as a share of all votes cast, from Call the Map's own county sums.
  • Same source as Act I's 2024-president reference mark, so the origin lands on it.

This race’s polls +15.830 points

What this race’s own recent polling adds beyond its prior. The forecast weights each poll for recency and sample size and counts each pollster once; the weights listed here are those of the polls’ own average.

  • State Navigate (2026-10-25, n=1,752): R+3.0 · weight 0.97 in the poll average
  • State Navigate (2026-10-04, n=948): R+3.0 · weight 0.64 in the poll average
  • Braun Research (2026-09-21, n=732): R+9.3 · weight 0.48 in the poll average
  • University of New Hampshire (2026-09-21, n=829): D+6.0 · weight 0.51 in the poll average
  • University of New Hampshire (2026-07-20, n=925): R+11.0 · weight 0.26 in the poll average
  • University of New Hampshire (2026-06-23, n=867): R+15.0 · weight 0.18 in the poll average
  • Poll average R+4.5, from 6 polls · 6 recorded polls. This is the polls’ own average, each poll at its published margin, the figure this page’s poll summary shows. In governor races the forecast then counts a poll sponsored by a party or campaign at full weight and moves its margin 2 points against that party, which leaves the average it reads the same for this race. It then applies a fitted correction of 2.5 points toward Republicans for governor races, measured from past polling error, before blending it with its other evidence. The forecast gives the polls 98% of the weight against its structural prior for this race, which moves the margin 15.8 points away from Republicans from where it stood before the polls. Eligible polls: latest poll: 2026-10-25 (3 days old).

National environment +1.832 points

The contribution to this race’s margin, not the national polling margin itself. The race’s loading, reference level and polling blend determine how much of the national climate reaches its final forecast.

  • The national environment in this edition is D+8.4. This row is its contribution to the race’s prior, not a claim that the country is D+1.8.
  • This step’s recorded contribution to the margin is +1.8.
  • The elasticity is fitted on the pooled panel of contested governor races (2010–2024) with cycle-clustered standard errors; it is a measured response to the national environment, not a judgment floor.

Fitted model, above the terrain shown −56.749 points

What the fitted model adds on top of the starting terrain above — incumbency, past results, campaign finance and the other fitted terms — measured from that terrain rather than from EVEN. It is a comparison with the starting point already shown, not a separate input. The source detail lists the variables the fit uses.

  • Fitted baseline -24.979 minus starting point 31.770 = -56.749 points.
  • Fitted intercept: -6.136 points.
  • 2010 White population share used by the frozen historical fit: observed input 95.272. -0.503 × ((95.272 − 77.922) / 12.864) = -0.678 points.
  • gov_midterm_wh: observed input -1.000. -0.987 × ((-1.000 − 0.336) / 0.739) = 1.785 points.
  • 2024 presidential lean relative to the national result: observed input 34.271. 4.163 × ((34.271 − -4.415) / 20.258) = 7.950 points.
  • Previous governor election margin: observed input -40.000. 1.755 × ((-40.000 − -3.131) / 19.227) = -3.366 points.
  • gov_inc_running_signed: observed input -1.000. 2.531 × ((-1.000 − -0.120) / 0.708) = -3.145 points.
  • gov_inc_tenure_signed: observed input -5.000. 3.340 × ((-5.000 − -0.143) / 0.902) = -17.985 points.
  • The displayed arithmetic is rounded; the fitted terms use full precision. The intercept plus these five terms gives the non-ratings baseline.
  • No source-verified current Gallup reading supports the former 40% / July 2026 claim. The current Gallup series ends in 2025; the Presidency Project identifies its 2026 observations as other pollsters. Use the unchanged fitted missing-value rule, not a replacement polling scale.
  • Certified 2024 presidential baseline: state D+32.8, national R+1.5; subtracting the national margin gives relative lean +34.3. Source: FEC compilation of certified state results.

Historical error calibration −0.364 points

A prior-election residual correction, when an admitted model publishes one.

  • The forecast’s calibration against past governor results. The recorded contribution is −0.4.

Votes for other candidates +0.363 points

Every step above is measured between the two major-party candidates alone, as if nobody else were on the ballot. The forecast sets 4.7% of the vote aside for other candidates and write-ins, so as a share of every vote cast the gap between the two is smaller by that much. This step is exactly that: the two-party margin times the share going to other candidates. It is the same arithmetic that turns the two-party margin into the two shares printed at the top of the page.

The components this edition publishes for this race, in points. “Other factors” closes the sum to the two-party structural lean exactly. The margin the page prints is a share of every vote cast, so the “Votes for other candidates” row carries the exact difference between the two-party lean and that margin; with it, the walk sums to the printed margin exactly.

Named factorContribution
FundamentalsThe admitted fitted baseline. Its surviving variables differ by office; the source detail above identifies those used for this race.−24.98
This race's pollsAdmitted head-to-head polls of this race, recency- and quality-weighted.+15.83
National environmentThe national environment’s contribution to the prior. Polling can attenuate its influence; this value is not the national polling margin.+1.83
Historical calibrationThe House lane's calibration against certified past cycles.−0.36
Other factors+0.00

Where the votes are

The map of this race loads here.

Race context

Turnout, 2018 midterm
54.9% 278,230 ballots
Turnout, 2022 midterm
55.9% 291,955 ballots
2024 presidential margin
D+32.8between the two parties

Turnout is ballots cast statewide as a share of the voting-eligible population. Source: University of Florida Election Lab ↗

Population profile

White alone · 92.3%594,131 of 643,816 · Residents2022 Census · matched race geography

Coverage

4 stories · 8 quotes

All coverage and full posts on the Wire →

Forecast as of October 28, 2026: Call the Map currently has Phil Scott ahead of Amanda Janoo by R+7.3, with an 89 in 100 chance to win. The seat is currently held by a Republican. That result would keep the seat with Republicans. The current poll average is R+4.5; 6 public polls are recorded.