Oregon · Governor
Christine Drazan is slightly favored to flip the Oregon governorship. Predicted margin: R+0.8.
Under each share, its likely range (80 in 100 simulations) · * incumbent
Forecast history
Latest reading · Oct 28 · first published Sep 9 · 80% range · margin points R+8.4 to D+6.6. Methodology
About this series
Reconstructed with the current model Aug 1 – Sep 8 and Sep 16 – Sep 18; published readings Sep 9 – Oct 28. Each reconstructed day is the current model on that day’s own inputs, not a forecast published then. Corrections are dated in the changelog.
Faded: CTMM 2.2 reconstructed history: computed after the fact with each date's available polls and environment, without expert ratings; not an issued forecast. Issued forecasts begin at the launch marker.
CTMM 2.2 readings for 2026-09-16, 2026-09-17, 2026-09-18 were computed after the fact with each day's available inputs: no edition was issued on those days. Not an issued forecast.
Data table
| Date | Margin | Chance | 80% range | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28 | R+0.8 | R win 55.9% | R+8.4 to D+6.6 | Published forecast |
| Oct 27 | R+0.8 | R win 55.3% | R+8.3 to D+6.7 | Published forecast |
| Oct 26 | R+0.7 | R win 54.7% | R+8.2 to D+6.8 | Published forecast |
| Oct 25 | R+0.6 | R win 54.2% | R+8.1 to D+6.9 | Published forecast |
| Oct 24 | R+0.6 | R win 53.7% | R+8.1 to D+6.9 | Published forecast |
| Oct 23 | R+0.5 | R win 53.3% | R+8.0 to D+7.0 | Published forecast |
| Oct 22 | R+0.4 | R win 52.7% | R+7.9 to D+7.1 | Published forecast |
| Oct 21 | R+0.3 | R win 52.2% | R+7.8 to D+7.2 | Published forecast |
| Oct 20 | R+0.2 | R win 51.6% | R+7.7 to D+7.2 | Published forecast |
| Oct 19 | R+0.2 | R win 51.1% | R+7.7 to D+7.3 | Published forecast |
| Oct 18 | R+0.1 | R win 50.5% | R+7.6 to D+7.4 | Published forecast |
| Oct 17 | EVEN | R win 50.0% | R+7.5 to D+7.5 | Published forecast |
| Oct 16 | D+0.1 | D win 50.4% | R+7.4 to D+7.6 | Published forecast |
| Oct 15 | D+0.1 | D win 51.0% | R+7.3 to D+7.6 | Published forecast |
| Oct 14 | D+0.2 | D win 51.5% | R+7.3 to D+7.7 | Published forecast |
| Oct 13 | D+0.3 | D win 52.0% | R+7.2 to D+7.8 | Published forecast |
| Oct 12 | D+0.5 | D win 53.0% | R+7.0 to D+8.0 | Published forecast |
| Oct 11 | D+0.5 | D win 53.0% | R+7.0 to D+8.0 | Published forecast |
| Oct 10 | D+0.5 | D win 53.6% | R+7.0 to D+8.0 | Published forecast |
| Oct 9 | D+0.6 | D win 54.1% | R+6.9 to D+8.1 | Published forecast |
| Oct 8 | R+1.0 | R win 56.8% | R+8.7 to D+6.7 | Published forecast |
| Oct 7 | R+0.9 | R win 56.2% | R+8.7 to D+6.8 | Published forecast |
| Oct 6 | R+0.9 | R win 55.8% | R+8.6 to D+6.9 | Published forecast |
| Oct 5 | R+0.8 | R win 55.3% | R+8.5 to D+6.9 | Published forecast |
| Oct 4 | R+0.7 | R win 55.0% | R+8.4 to D+7.0 | Published forecast |
| Oct 3 | R+0.6 | R win 54.1% | R+8.4 to D+7.1 | Published forecast |
| Oct 2 | R+0.5 | R win 53.6% | R+8.3 to D+7.2 | Published forecast |
| Oct 1 | R+0.5 | R win 53.1% | R+8.2 to D+7.3 | Published forecast |
| Sep 30 | R+0.5 | R win 53.5% | R+8.4 to D+7.3 | Published forecast |
| Sep 29 | R+0.5 | R win 53.4% | R+8.3 to D+7.4 | Published forecast |
| Sep 28 | R+0.4 | R win 52.6% | R+8.2 to D+7.5 | Published forecast |
| Sep 27 | R+0.2 | R win 51.4% | R+8.1 to D+7.6 | Published forecast |
| Sep 26 | R+0.2 | R win 51.7% | R+8.1 to D+7.6 | Published forecast |
| Sep 25 | R+0.2 | R win 50.7% | R+8.0 to D+7.7 | Published forecast |
| Sep 24 | R+0.1 | R win 50.5% | R+7.9 to D+7.8 | Published forecast |
| Sep 23 | EVEN | R win 50.0% | R+7.9 to D+7.8 | Published forecast |
| Sep 22 | D+0.2 | D win 51.3% | R+7.6 to D+8.1 | Published forecast |
| Sep 21 | D+0.2 | D win 51.3% | R+7.6 to D+8.1 | Published forecast |
| Sep 20 | D+0.2 | D win 52.1% | R+7.6 to D+8.1 | Published forecast |
| Sep 19 | D+0.3 | D win 52.2% | R+7.5 to D+8.2 | Published forecast |
| Sep 18 | D+0.4 | D win 52.7% | R+7.4 to D+8.3 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 17 | D+0.5 | D win 53.2% | R+7.4 to D+8.3 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 16 | D+0.6 | D win 53.5% | R+7.3 to D+8.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 15 | D+3.2 | D win 68.9% | R+5.0 to D+11.4 | Published forecast |
| Sep 14 | D+3.2 | D win 69.3% | R+5.0 to D+11.4 | Published forecast |
| Sep 13 | D+3.2 | D win 69.0% | R+5.0 to D+11.4 | Published forecast |
| Sep 12 | D+3.2 | D win 69.4% | R+5.0 to D+11.4 | Published forecast |
| Sep 11 | D+3.3 | D win 69.7% | R+5.0 to D+11.5 | Published forecast |
| Sep 10 | D+3.3 | D win 69.8% | R+4.9 to D+11.5 | Published forecast |
| Sep 9 | D+5.9 | D win 82.1% | R+2.4 to D+14.1 | Published forecast |
| Sep 8 | D+3.3 | D win 70.0% | R+4.9 to D+11.5 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 7 | D+3.3 | D win 70.1% | R+4.9 to D+11.5 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 6 | D+3.4 | D win 70.3% | R+4.9 to D+11.6 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 5 | D+3.6 | D win 71.6% | R+4.6 to D+11.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 4 | D+3.6 | D win 71.8% | R+4.5 to D+11.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 3 | D+3.7 | D win 72.1% | R+4.5 to D+11.9 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 2 | D+3.7 | D win 72.3% | R+4.4 to D+11.9 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 1 | D+3.8 | D win 72.6% | R+4.4 to D+12.0 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 31 | D+3.9 | D win 72.9% | R+4.3 to D+12.0 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 30 | D+3.9 | D win 73.2% | R+4.3 to D+12.1 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 29 | D+4.0 | D win 73.5% | R+4.2 to D+12.1 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 28 | D+4.0 | D win 73.7% | R+4.2 to D+12.2 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 27 | D+4.1 | D win 74.0% | R+4.1 to D+12.3 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 26 | D+4.1 | D win 74.2% | R+4.1 to D+12.3 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 25 | D+4.2 | D win 74.5% | R+4.0 to D+12.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 24 | D+4.2 | D win 74.7% | R+4.0 to D+12.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 23 | D+4.3 | D win 75.0% | R+3.9 to D+12.5 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 22 | D+4.1 | D win 74.1% | R+4.1 to D+12.3 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 21 | D+4.2 | D win 74.1% | R+4.0 to D+12.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 20 | D+4.2 | D win 74.4% | R+4.0 to D+12.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 19 | D+4.3 | D win 74.8% | R+3.9 to D+12.5 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 18 | D+4.3 | D win 75.1% | R+3.9 to D+12.6 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 17 | D+4.4 | D win 75.3% | R+3.8 to D+12.6 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 16 | D+4.5 | D win 75.6% | R+3.7 to D+12.7 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 15 | D+4.5 | D win 76.0% | R+3.7 to D+12.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 14 | D+4.6 | D win 76.1% | R+3.6 to D+12.8 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 13 | D+4.6 | D win 76.4% | R+3.6 to D+12.9 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 12 | D+4.7 | D win 76.8% | R+3.5 to D+12.9 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 11 | D+4.8 | D win 77.1% | R+3.4 to D+13.0 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 10 | D+4.9 | D win 77.4% | R+3.4 to D+13.1 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 9 | D+4.9 | D win 77.7% | R+3.3 to D+13.1 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 8 | D+5.0 | D win 78.0% | R+3.2 to D+13.2 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 7 | D+5.1 | D win 78.3% | R+3.2 to D+13.3 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 6 | D+5.1 | D win 78.5% | R+3.1 to D+13.3 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 5 | D+5.2 | D win 78.8% | R+3.1 to D+13.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 4 | D+5.2 | D win 79.1% | R+3.0 to D+13.5 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 3 | D+5.3 | D win 79.3% | R+2.9 to D+13.5 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 2 | D+5.4 | D win 79.7% | R+2.9 to D+13.6 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 1 | D+5.4 | D win 80.0% | R+2.8 to D+13.7 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
The polls
Poll average D+1.1A poll’s weight halves every 60 days and grows with its sample. Each pollster counts once, at its best release. Every poll counts at its published margin, sponsored or not.In governor races the forecast then counts a poll sponsored by a party or campaign at full weight and moves its margin 2 points against that party, which puts the average it reads at D+0.6. It then applies a fitted correction of 2.5 points toward Republicans for governor races, measured from past polling error, before blending it with its other evidence.7 recorded polls · 6 in the poll average
| Fieldwork | Added | Pollster | Result | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| from 2026-10-01 | GBAO ↗ | D+4.0D 46% · R 42% | 800 LV | |
| from 2026-09-24 | DHM Research ↗The Oregonian/OregonLive | D+2.0D 46% · R 44% | 549 LV | |
| from 2026-09-17 | DHM Research ↗Oregon Public Broadcasting | R+1.0D 46% · R 47% | 915 LV | |
| from 2026-09-03 | DHM Research ↗Grow Oregon | R+2.0D 43% · R 45% | 600 LV | |
| from 2026-06-22 | Public Opinion Strategies ↗ | R+4.0D 44% · R 48% | 600 RV | |
| from 2026-05-11 | Hoffman Research Group ↗ | EVEND 45% · R 45% | 603 LV | |
| from 2026-01-28 | FM3 Research ↗Charlie HealthDisplay-only · excluded from aggregate | D+5.0D 45% · R 40% | 1,065 LV |
Explore each poll’s weight in the average
Poll average D+1.1
- Published result
- D+4.0
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.58 · 41% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 1 Oct–4 Oct
- Sample
- 800 LV
- Sponsor
- DEM sponsor · organization not listed
- Published result
- D+2.0
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.47 · 13% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 24 Sep–1 Oct
- Sample
- 549 LV
- Sponsor
- The Oregonian/OregonLive
- Published result
- R+1.0
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.58 · 17% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 17 Sep–27 Sep
- Sample
- 915 LV
- Sponsor
- Oregon Public Broadcasting
- Published result
- R+2.0
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.38 · 11% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 3 Sep–9 Sep
- Sample
- 600 LV
- Sponsor
- Grow Oregon
- Published result
- R+4.0
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.16 · 11% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 22 Jun–24 Jun
- Sample
- 600 RV
- Sponsor
- REP sponsor · organization not listed
- Published result
- EVEN
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.09 · 6.7% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 11 May–12 May
- Sample
- 603 LV
- Sponsor
- REP sponsor · organization not listed
- Published result
- D+5.0
- Read by the poll average as
- Not in the poll average
- Weight in the poll average
- excluded by source policy
- Fieldwork
- 28 Jan–4 Feb
- Sample
- 1,065 LV
- Sponsor
- Charlie Health
Excluded from the poll average by source policy: this source is in a pending trial, so the poll is shown and not counted.
The New York Times polling archive · first recorded by Call the Map 19 AugOpen poll sourceHow the margin was built
Tap an input for its calculation and source.
Displayed values are rounded.
All calculations & sources
How this state voted, 2024 +14.390 points
The state's presidential margin in 2024 as a share of all votes cast, from our own county sums — the same measurement the model's statewide terrain center is built from. Every pull below is measured from here, not from EVEN, which is why a landslide seat's listed pulls are small numbers and still land where the forecast does.
- 2024 presidential result for this state, as a share of all votes cast, from Call the Map's own county sums.
- Same source as Act I's 2024-president reference mark, so the origin lands on it.
Fitted model, above the terrain shown +3.731 points
What the fitted model adds on top of the starting terrain above — incumbency, past results, campaign finance and the other fitted terms — measured from that terrain rather than from EVEN. It is a comparison with the starting point already shown, not a separate input. The source detail lists the variables the fit uses.
- Fitted baseline 18.121 minus starting point 14.390 = 3.731 points.
- Fitted intercept: -6.136 points.
- 2010 White population share used by the frozen historical fit: observed input 83.589. -0.503 × ((83.589 − 77.922) / 12.864) = -0.221 points.
- gov_midterm_wh: observed input -1.000. -0.987 × ((-1.000 − 0.336) / 0.739) = 1.785 points.
- 2024 presidential lean relative to the national result: observed input 16.366. 4.163 × ((16.366 − -4.415) / 20.258) = 4.271 points.
- Previous governor election margin: observed input 3.420. 1.755 × ((3.420 − -3.131) / 19.227) = 0.598 points.
- gov_inc_running_signed: observed input 1.000. 2.531 × ((1.000 − -0.120) / 0.708) = 4.001 points.
- gov_inc_tenure_signed: observed input 1.000. 3.340 × ((1.000 − -0.143) / 0.902) = 4.232 points.
- The displayed arithmetic is rounded; the fitted terms use full precision. The intercept plus these five terms gives the non-ratings baseline.
- No source-verified current Gallup reading supports the former 40% / July 2026 claim. The current Gallup series ends in 2025; the Presidency Project identifies its 2026 observations as other pollsters. Use the unchanged fitted missing-value rule, not a replacement polling scale.
- Certified 2024 presidential baseline: state D+14.9, national R+1.5; subtracting the national margin gives relative lean +16.4. Source: FEC compilation of certified state results.
National environment +1.832 points
The contribution to this race’s margin, not the national polling margin itself. The race’s loading, reference level and polling blend determine how much of the national climate reaches its final forecast.
- The national environment in this edition is D+8.4. This row is its contribution to the race’s prior, not a claim that the country is D+1.8.
- This step’s recorded contribution to the margin is +1.8.
- The elasticity is fitted on the pooled panel of contested governor races (2010–2024) with cycle-clustered standard errors; it is a measured response to the national environment, not a judgment floor.
Historical error calibration +0.540 points
A prior-election residual correction, when an admitted model publishes one.
- The forecast’s calibration against past governor results. The recorded contribution is +0.5.
This race’s polls −21.413 points
What this race’s own recent polling adds beyond its prior. The forecast weights each poll for recency and sample size and counts each pollster once; the weights listed here are those of the polls’ own average.
- GBAO (2026-10-04, n=800): D+4.0 · weight 0.58 in the poll average
- DHM Research (2026-10-01, n=549): D+2.0 · weight 0.47 in the poll average
- DHM Research (2026-09-27, n=915): R+1.0 · weight 0.58 in the poll average
- DHM Research (2026-09-09, n=600): R+2.0 · weight 0.38 in the poll average
- Public Opinion Strategies (2026-06-24, n=600): R+4.0 · weight 0.16 in the poll average
- Hoffman Research Group (2026-05-12, n=603): ±0.0 · weight 0.09 in the poll average
- … and 1 more below.
- Poll average D+1.1, from 6 polls · 7 recorded polls. This is the polls’ own average, each poll at its published margin, the figure this page’s poll summary shows. In governor races the forecast then counts a poll sponsored by a party or campaign at full weight and moves its margin 2 points against that party, which puts the average it reads at D+0.6. It then applies a fitted correction of 2.5 points toward Republicans for governor races, measured from past polling error, before blending it with its other evidence. The forecast gives the polls 98% of the weight against its structural prior for this race, which moves the margin 21.4 points toward Republicans from where it stood before the polls. Eligible polls: latest poll: 2026-10-04 (24 days old).
Votes for other candidates +0.042 points
Every step above is measured between the two major-party candidates alone, as if nobody else were on the ballot. The forecast sets 4.6% of the vote aside for other candidates and write-ins, so as a share of every vote cast the gap between the two is smaller by that much. This step is exactly that: the two-party margin times the share going to other candidates. It is the same arithmetic that turns the two-party margin into the two shares printed at the top of the page.
The components this edition publishes for this race, in points. “Other factors” closes the sum to the two-party structural lean exactly. The margin the page prints is a share of every vote cast, so the “Votes for other candidates” row carries the exact difference between the two-party lean and that margin; with it, the walk sums to the printed margin exactly.
| Named factor | Contribution |
|---|---|
| This race's pollsAdmitted head-to-head polls of this race, recency- and quality-weighted. | −21.41 |
| FundamentalsThe admitted fitted baseline. Its surviving variables differ by office; the source detail above identifies those used for this race. | +18.12 |
| National environmentThe national environment’s contribution to the prior. Polling can attenuate its influence; this value is not the national polling margin. | +1.83 |
| Historical calibrationThe House lane's calibration against certified past cycles. | +0.54 |
| Other factors | −0.00 |
Where the votes are
The map of this race loads here.
Recent elections
| Election | Result | Votes cast |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 · Governor ↗ | D+3.4 | 1,935,852 |
| 2018 · Governor ↗ | D+6.4 | 1,866,997 |
| 2016 · Governor ↗ | D+7.2 | 1,946,046 |
| 2014 · Governor ↗ | D+5.8 | 1,469,717 |
Margins are the Democrat’s share of all votes cast minus the Republican’s.
Race context
- Turnout, 2018 midterm
- 59.3% 1,914,923 ballots
- Turnout, 2022 midterm
- 62.4% 1,997,689 ballots
- 2024 presidential margin
- D+14.9between the two parties
Turnout is ballots cast statewide as a share of the voting-eligible population. Source: University of Florida Election Lab ↗
Population profile
U.S. Census Bureau, 2022 American Community Survey 5-year estimates ↗
Coverage
8 quotes
- Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek’s recent executive order barring data centers on state lands is creating roadblocks for telecommunications companies building out fiber-optic cable networks that transmit internet data and that are typically buried along state highways. ↗
OPB · Official · 5h ago
curated state newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match - Oregon has a $421 million hole in the upcoming budget cycle due to federal cuts to Medicaid. OPB asked the candidates for governor detailed questions on how they'd address it. Republican Christine Drazan didn't answer any of the questions. Gov. Tina Kotek answered three and sent a statement. ↗
OPB · Official · 11h ago
curated state newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match - Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek’s recent executive order barring data centers on state lands is creating roadblocks for telecommunications companies building out fiber-optic cable networks that transmit internet data and that are typically buried along state highways. buff.ly/ZTZAJQZ ↗
Oregon Capital Chronicle · Official · 1d ago
curated state newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match - State agencies are fanning out to offer assistance in the wake of a tragic attack at a Bend elementary school this month, Gov. Tina Kotek said Monday.
oregoncapitalchronicle.com/2026/10/26/g... ↗
Oregon Capital Chronicle · Official · 2d ago
curated state newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match - At a press conference at the Harmony Montessori School in Portland, Gov. Kotek said she's propose a bill to streamline a slate of state and local early childhood learning programs and focus on expanding ones working best to boost access and affordability. oregoncapitalchronicle.com/2026/10/23/o... ↗
Oregon Capital Chronicle · Official · 5d ago
curated state newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match - An eastern Oregon city that has for the last decade welcomed some of the largest data centers in the state is fighting Gov. Tina Kotek’s recent order meant to temporarily pause data center development, saying it could cost the city millions in direct financial losses. buff.ly/NF5kr3Q ↗
Oregon Capital Chronicle · Official · Oct 21
curated state newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match - An eastern Oregon city that has for the last decade welcomed some of the largest data centers in the state will soon decide whether to fight Gov. Tina Kotek’s recent order meant to temporarily pause data center development. washingtonstatestandard.com/2026/10/20/r... ↗
Washington State Standard · Official · Oct 20
curated state newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match - Polling a few weeks out from the Nov. 3 election showed the race in a statistical tie, and Gov. Tina Kotek's and Sen. Christine Drazan's rhetorical skills are being tested in ways that their allies say are naturally uncomfortable for the candidates. buff.ly/Ij7vkbR ↗
Oregon Capital Chronicle · Official · Oct 20
curated state newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match · election-topic match
Forecast as of October 28, 2026: Call the Map currently has Christine Drazan ahead of Tina Kotek by R+0.8, with a 56 in 100 chance to win. The seat is currently held by a Democrat. That result would flip the seat to Republicans. The current poll average is D+1.1; 7 public polls are recorded.