Call
the Map
Forecast6 days out
← GovernorsNovember 3, 2026

New York · Governor

Kathy Hochul is heavily favored to hold the New York governorship. Predicted margin: D+12.0.

Kathy Hochul incumbent (D)97 in 10054.951.3–58.5
Bruce Blakeman (R)3 in 10042.939.3–46.5

Under each share, its likely range (80 in 100 simulations) · * incumbent

Background

Hochul favored but with soft approval; a strong R could narrow it.

Likely DDemocratic-held seat

Forecast history

Steady+0.1 pts · Oct 26 → Oct 28New York Governor: steady — the published margin moved +0.1 points between the Oct 26 and Oct 28 editions (3 of 47 stored editions). This is movement of the published forecast between editions.
D+15D+10Aug 1Nov 3 · Election Day

Latest reading · Oct 28 · first published Sep 9 · 80% range · margin points D+4.8 to D+19.2. Methodology

 

About this series

Reconstructed with the current model Aug 1 – Sep 8 and Sep 16 – Sep 18; published readings Sep 9 – Oct 28. Each reconstructed day is the current model on that day’s own inputs, not a forecast published then. Corrections are dated in the changelog.

Faded: CTMM 2.2 reconstructed history: computed after the fact with each date's available polls and environment, without expert ratings; not an issued forecast. Issued forecasts begin at the launch marker.

CTMM 2.2 readings for 2026-09-16, 2026-09-17, 2026-09-18 were computed after the fact with each day's available inputs: no edition was issued on those days. Not an issued forecast.

Data table
DateMarginChance80% rangeReading
Oct 28D+12.0D win 97.0%D+4.8 to D+19.2Published forecast
Oct 27D+11.9D win 96.9%D+4.7 to D+19.1Published forecast
Oct 26D+11.9D win 96.9%D+4.7 to D+19.1Published forecast
Oct 25D+12.0D win 96.9%D+4.7 to D+19.2Published forecast
Oct 24D+12.0D win 97.0%D+4.8 to D+19.2Published forecast
Oct 23D+11.5D win 96.6%D+4.3 to D+18.7Published forecast
Oct 22D+11.6D win 96.6%D+4.3 to D+18.8Published forecast
Oct 21D+11.1D win 96.2%D+3.9 to D+18.3Published forecast
Oct 20D+11.8D win 96.8%D+4.5 to D+19.0Published forecast
Oct 19D+11.8D win 96.8%D+4.6 to D+19.1Published forecast
Oct 18D+11.9D win 96.8%D+4.6 to D+19.1Published forecast
Oct 17D+11.9D win 96.8%D+4.6 to D+19.2Published forecast
Oct 16D+11.9D win 96.9%D+4.7 to D+19.2Published forecast
Oct 15D+12.0D win 96.9%D+4.7 to D+19.2Published forecast
Oct 14D+10.8D win 95.8%D+3.5 to D+18.0Published forecast
Oct 13D+11.5D win 96.5%D+4.3 to D+18.8Published forecast
Oct 12D+11.6D win 96.6%D+4.3 to D+18.9Published forecast
Oct 11D+11.6D win 96.6%D+4.3 to D+18.9Published forecast
Oct 10D+11.7D win 96.6%D+4.4 to D+18.9Published forecast
Oct 9D+11.7D win 96.7%D+4.4 to D+19.0Published forecast
Oct 8D+11.7D win 96.7%D+4.4 to D+19.0Published forecast
Oct 7D+11.6D win 96.5%D+4.3 to D+18.9Published forecast
Oct 6D+11.6D win 96.7%D+4.3 to D+18.9Published forecast
Oct 5D+12.2D win 97.1%D+4.8 to D+19.5Published forecast
Oct 4D+12.2D win 97.0%D+4.9 to D+19.5Published forecast
Oct 3D+12.3D win 97.1%D+4.9 to D+19.6Published forecast
Oct 2D+12.3D win 97.1%D+5.0 to D+19.6Published forecast
Oct 1D+12.3D win 97.2%D+5.0 to D+19.7Published forecast
Sep 30D+12.4D win 97.2%D+5.0 to D+19.7Published forecast
Sep 29D+12.4D win 97.2%D+5.1 to D+19.8Published forecast
Sep 28D+12.5D win 97.3%D+5.1 to D+19.8Published forecast
Sep 27D+12.6D win 97.4%D+5.2 to D+19.9Published forecast
Sep 26D+12.6D win 97.3%D+5.2 to D+19.9Published forecast
Sep 25D+12.6D win 97.3%D+5.2 to D+20.0Published forecast
Sep 24D+12.6D win 97.2%D+5.3 to D+20.0Published forecast
Sep 23D+11.3D win 96.2%D+3.8 to D+18.9Published forecast
Sep 22D+11.5D win 96.3%D+3.9 to D+19.0Published forecast
Sep 21D+11.5D win 96.3%D+3.9 to D+19.0Published forecast
Sep 20D+11.5D win 96.4%D+3.9 to D+19.0Published forecast
Sep 19D+11.2D win 96.1%D+3.6 to D+18.9Published forecast
Sep 18D+11.3D win 96.2%D+3.7 to D+18.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 17D+11.4D win 96.3%D+3.7 to D+19.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 16D+11.4D win 95.9%D+3.8 to D+19.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 15D+11.4D win 96.0%D+3.8 to D+19.0Published forecast
Sep 14D+11.5D win 96.1%D+3.9 to D+19.1Published forecast
Sep 13D+11.5D win 96.0%D+3.9 to D+19.1Published forecast
Sep 12D+11.5D win 96.0%D+3.9 to D+19.1Published forecast
Sep 11D+11.6D win 96.1%D+4.0 to D+19.2Published forecast
Sep 10D+11.6D win 96.1%D+4.0 to D+19.2Published forecast
Sep 9D+12.0D win 96.5%D+4.4 to D+19.6Published forecast
Sep 8D+11.7D win 96.2%D+4.1 to D+19.3Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 7D+12.7D win 97.0%D+5.0 to D+20.5Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 6D+12.8D win 97.1%D+5.1 to D+20.5Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 5D+12.8D win 97.1%D+5.1 to D+20.6Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 4D+12.9D win 97.1%D+5.2 to D+20.6Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 3D+12.9D win 97.2%D+5.2 to D+20.6Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 2D+12.2D win 96.7%D+4.4 to D+20.1Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 1D+12.4D win 96.8%D+4.6 to D+20.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 31D+12.4D win 96.8%D+4.6 to D+20.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 30D+12.5D win 96.8%D+4.7 to D+20.3Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 29D+12.5D win 96.8%D+4.7 to D+20.3Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 28D+12.6D win 96.9%D+4.7 to D+20.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 27D+12.6D win 96.9%D+4.8 to D+20.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 26D+12.6D win 96.9%D+4.8 to D+20.5Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 25D+12.7D win 97.0%D+4.9 to D+20.5Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 24D+12.7D win 97.0%D+4.9 to D+20.6Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 23D+12.8D win 97.0%D+5.0 to D+20.6Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 22D+13.2D win 97.3%D+5.4 to D+21.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 21D+13.3D win 97.0%D+5.4 to D+21.1Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 20D+13.3D win 97.0%D+5.5 to D+21.1Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 19D+13.3D win 97.0%D+5.5 to D+21.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 18D+13.4D win 97.1%D+5.6 to D+21.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 17D+13.4D win 97.1%D+5.6 to D+21.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 16D+13.5D win 97.1%D+5.7 to D+21.3Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 15D+13.5D win 97.2%D+5.7 to D+21.3Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 14D+13.5D win 97.2%D+5.7 to D+21.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 13D+13.9D win 97.3%D+6.0 to D+21.7Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 12D+13.9D win 97.4%D+6.1 to D+21.8Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 11D+14.0D win 97.4%D+6.1 to D+21.8Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 10D+14.0D win 97.4%D+6.2 to D+21.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 9D+14.1D win 97.4%D+6.2 to D+21.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 8D+14.1D win 97.4%D+6.3 to D+22.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 7D+14.2D win 97.5%D+6.3 to D+22.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 6D+14.2D win 97.5%D+6.3 to D+22.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 5D+14.2D win 97.5%D+6.4 to D+22.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 4D+14.2D win 97.5%D+6.4 to D+22.1Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 3D+14.3D win 97.5%D+6.4 to D+22.1Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 2D+14.3D win 97.5%D+6.5 to D+22.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 1D+14.4D win 97.6%D+6.5 to D+22.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs

The polls

Poll average D+12.0A poll’s weight halves every 60 days and grows with its sample. Each pollster counts once, at its best release. Every poll counts at its published margin, sponsored or not.In governor races the forecast then counts a poll sponsored by a party or campaign at full weight and moves its margin 2 points against that party, which puts the average it reads at D+12.3. It then applies a fitted correction of 2.5 points toward Republicans for governor races, measured from past polling error, before blending it with its other evidence.33 recorded polls · 31 in the poll average

FieldworkAddedPollsterResultSample
from 2026-10-2212h agoMarist University ↗D+11.0D 53% · R 42%1,448 LV
from 2026-10-1912h agoSiena University ↗D+14.0D 54% · R 40%807 LV
from 2026-10-015d agoActiVote ↗D+18.0D 59% · R 41%400 LV
from 2026-10-017d agoOnMessage Inc. (R) ↗D+4.0D 50% · R 46%1,000 LV
from 2026-10-157d agoQuinnipiac University ↗D+14.0D 55% · R 41%1,167 LV
from 2026-10-12OnMessage Inc. ↗D+4.4D 50.3% · R 45.9%1,000 LV
from 2026-10-01Beacon Research ↗D+22.0D 53% · R 31%820 RV
from 2026-10-03Emerson College ↗PIX 11D+12.7D 52.41% · R 39.74%900 LV
Explore each poll’s weight in the average

8 of 33 matching · 33 total

Poll average D+12.0

Marist University25 Oct · 1,448 LV · added 28 Oct
ActiVote23 Oct · 400 LV · added 24 Oct
Siena University22 Oct · 807 LV · added 28 Oct
Quinnipiac University19 Oct · 1,167 LV · added 21 Oct
OnMessage Inc.14 Oct · 1,000 LV · added 21 Oct
Beacon Research6 Oct · 820 RV · added 15 Oct
OnMessage Inc. (R)6 Oct · 1,000 LV · added 22 Oct
Emerson College5 Oct · 900 LV · added 8 Oct
Explore all 33 polls for this race

How the margin was built

Tap an input for its calculation and source.

Toward D+22.1
Toward R−10.1
Forecast marginD+12.0

Displayed values are rounded.

All calculations & sources

How this state voted, 2024 +12.690 points

The state's presidential margin in 2024 as a share of all votes cast, from our own county sums — the same measurement the model's statewide terrain center is built from. Every pull below is measured from here, not from EVEN, which is why a landslide seat's listed pulls are small numbers and still land where the forecast does.

  • 2024 presidential result for this state, as a share of all votes cast, from Call the Map's own county sums.
  • Same source as Act I's 2024-president reference mark, so the origin lands on it.

Fitted model, above the terrain shown +5.314 points

What the fitted model adds on top of the starting terrain above — incumbency, past results, campaign finance and the other fitted terms — measured from that terrain rather than from EVEN. It is a comparison with the starting point already shown, not a separate input. The source detail lists the variables the fit uses.

  • Fitted baseline 18.004 minus starting point 12.690 = 5.314 points.
  • Fitted intercept: -6.136 points.
  • 2010 White population share used by the frozen historical fit: observed input 65.147. -0.503 × ((65.147 − 77.922) / 12.864) = 0.499 points.
  • gov_midterm_wh: observed input -1.000. -0.987 × ((-1.000 − 0.336) / 0.739) = 1.785 points.
  • 2024 presidential lean relative to the national result: observed input 14.190. 4.163 × ((14.190 − -4.415) / 20.258) = 3.823 points.
  • Previous governor election margin: observed input 7.270. 1.755 × ((7.270 − -3.131) / 19.227) = 0.950 points.
  • gov_inc_running_signed: observed input 1.000. 2.531 × ((1.000 − -0.120) / 0.708) = 4.001 points.
  • gov_inc_tenure_signed: observed input 1.000. 3.340 × ((1.000 − -0.143) / 0.902) = 4.232 points.
  • The displayed arithmetic is rounded; the fitted terms use full precision. The intercept plus these five terms gives the non-ratings baseline.
  • No source-verified current Gallup reading supports the former 40% / July 2026 claim. The current Gallup series ends in 2025; the Presidency Project identifies its 2026 observations as other pollsters. Use the unchanged fitted missing-value rule, not a replacement polling scale.
  • Certified 2024 presidential baseline: state D+12.7, national R+1.5; subtracting the national margin gives relative lean +14.2. Source: FEC compilation of certified state results.

Historical error calibration +2.306 points

A prior-election residual correction, when an admitted model publishes one.

  • The forecast’s calibration against past governor results. The recorded contribution is +2.3.

National environment +1.832 points

The contribution to this race’s margin, not the national polling margin itself. The race’s loading, reference level and polling blend determine how much of the national climate reaches its final forecast.

  • The national environment in this edition is D+8.4. This row is its contribution to the race’s prior, not a claim that the country is D+1.8.
  • This step’s recorded contribution to the margin is +1.8.
  • The elasticity is fitted on the pooled panel of contested governor races (2010–2024) with cycle-clustered standard errors; it is a measured response to the national environment, not a judgment floor.

This race’s polls −9.849 points

What this race’s own recent polling adds beyond its prior. The forecast weights each poll for recency and sample size and counts each pollster once; the weights listed here are those of the polls’ own average.

  • Marist University (2026-10-25, n=1,448): D+11.0 · weight 0.97 in the poll average
  • ActiVote (2026-10-23, n=400): D+18.0 · weight 0.51 in the poll average
  • Siena University (2026-10-22, n=807): D+14.0 · weight 0.72 in the poll average
  • Quinnipiac University (2026-10-19, n=1,167): D+14.0 · weight 0.84 in the poll average
  • OnMessage Inc. (2026-10-14, n=1,000): D+4.4 · weight 0.73 in the poll average
  • OnMessage Inc. (R) (2026-10-06, n=1,000): D+4.0 · weight 0.67 in the poll average
  • … and 27 more below.
  • Poll average D+12.0, from 31 polls · 33 recorded polls. This is the polls’ own average, each poll at its published margin, the figure this page’s poll summary shows. In governor races the forecast then counts a poll sponsored by a party or campaign at full weight and moves its margin 2 points against that party, which puts the average it reads at D+12.3. It then applies a fitted correction of 2.5 points toward Republicans for governor races, measured from past polling error, before blending it with its other evidence. The forecast gives the polls 98% of the weight against its structural prior for this race, which moves the margin 9.8 points toward Republicans from where it stood before the polls. Eligible polls: latest poll: 2026-10-25 (3 days old).

Votes for other candidates −0.279 points

Every step above is measured between the two major-party candidates alone, as if nobody else were on the ballot. The forecast sets 2.3% of the vote aside for other candidates and write-ins, so as a share of every vote cast the gap between the two is smaller by that much. This step is exactly that: the two-party margin times the share going to other candidates. It is the same arithmetic that turns the two-party margin into the two shares printed at the top of the page.

The components this edition publishes for this race, in points. “Other factors” closes the sum to the two-party structural lean exactly. The margin the page prints is a share of every vote cast, so the “Votes for other candidates” row carries the exact difference between the two-party lean and that margin; with it, the walk sums to the printed margin exactly.

Named factorContribution
FundamentalsThe admitted fitted baseline. Its surviving variables differ by office; the source detail above identifies those used for this race.+18.00
This race's pollsAdmitted head-to-head polls of this race, recency- and quality-weighted.−9.85
Historical calibrationThe House lane's calibration against certified past cycles.+2.31
National environmentThe national environment’s contribution to the prior. Polling can attenuate its influence; this value is not the national polling margin.+1.83
Other factors0.00

Where the votes are

The map of this race loads here.

Race context

Turnout, 2018 midterm
44.3% 6,230,959 ballots
Turnout, 2022 midterm
42.6% 5,962,278 ballots
2024 presidential margin
D+12.7between the two parties

Turnout is ballots cast statewide as a share of the voting-eligible population. Source: University of Florida Election Lab ↗

Population profile

White alone · 58.8%11,749,652 of 19,994,379 · Residents2022 Census · matched race geography

Coverage

3 stories · 5 quotes

All coverage and full posts on the Wire →

Forecast as of October 28, 2026: Call the Map currently has Kathy Hochul ahead of Bruce Blakeman by D+12.0, with a 97 in 100 chance to win. The seat is currently held by a Democrat. That result would keep the seat with Democrats. The current poll average is D+12.0; 33 public polls are recorded.