Minnesota · Governor
Amy Klobuchar is heavily favored to keep the Minnesota governorship in Democratic hands. Predicted margin: D+9.3.
Show all others (1)
Steven Young
Other is a combined forecast; individual estimates are not published.
Ballot eligibility alone supplies no quantitative estimate. Other is a collective share, not any named candidate’s forecast. Official ballot sources: Steven Young (checked 2026-08-31).
Under each share, its likely range (80 in 100 simulations)
Background
Amy Klobuchar (DFL) faces Lisa Demuth (R).
Forecast history
Latest reading · Oct 28 · first published Sep 9 · 80% range · margin points D+1.1 to D+17.4. Methodology
About this series
Reconstructed with the current model Aug 1 – Sep 8 and Sep 16 – Sep 18; published readings Sep 9 – Oct 28. Each reconstructed day is the current model on that day’s own inputs, not a forecast published then. Corrections are dated in the changelog.
Faded: CTMM 2.2 reconstructed history: computed after the fact with each date's available polls and environment, without expert ratings; not an issued forecast. Issued forecasts begin at the launch marker.
CTMM 2.2 readings for 2026-09-16, 2026-09-17, 2026-09-18 were computed after the fact with each day's available inputs: no edition was issued on those days. Not an issued forecast.
Data table
| Date | Margin | Chance | 80% range | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28 | D+9.3 | D win 92.3% | D+1.1 to D+17.4 | Published forecast |
| Oct 27 | D+7.5 | D win 87.6% | R+0.8 to D+15.8 | Published forecast |
| Oct 26 | D+7.7 | D win 88.3% | R+0.5 to D+15.9 | Published forecast |
| Oct 25 | D+7.7 | D win 88.4% | R+0.5 to D+15.9 | Published forecast |
| Oct 24 | D+7.7 | D win 88.5% | R+0.5 to D+15.9 | Published forecast |
| Oct 23 | D+7.7 | D win 88.6% | R+0.5 to D+15.9 | Published forecast |
| Oct 22 | D+7.8 | D win 88.6% | R+0.4 to D+16.0 | Published forecast |
| Oct 21 | D+7.8 | D win 88.7% | R+0.4 to D+16.0 | Published forecast |
| Oct 20 | D+7.8 | D win 88.8% | R+0.4 to D+16.0 | Published forecast |
| Oct 19 | D+7.8 | D win 88.9% | R+0.4 to D+16.1 | Published forecast |
| Oct 18 | D+7.9 | D win 88.9% | R+0.3 to D+16.1 | Published forecast |
| Oct 17 | D+7.9 | D win 89.0% | R+0.3 to D+16.1 | Published forecast |
| Oct 16 | D+7.9 | D win 88.8% | R+0.3 to D+16.1 | Published forecast |
| Oct 15 | D+7.9 | D win 88.9% | R+0.3 to D+16.2 | Published forecast |
| Oct 14 | D+8.2 | D win 89.4% | R+0.1 to D+16.4 | Published forecast |
| Oct 13 | D+8.2 | D win 89.5% | R+0.1 to D+16.4 | Published forecast |
| Oct 12 | D+8.0 | D win 88.5% | R+0.4 to D+16.5 | Published forecast |
| Oct 11 | D+8.0 | D win 88.5% | R+0.4 to D+16.5 | Published forecast |
| Oct 10 | D+8.1 | D win 88.6% | R+0.4 to D+16.6 | Published forecast |
| Oct 9 | D+7.9 | D win 87.6% | R+0.8 to D+16.6 | Published forecast |
| Oct 8 | D+7.9 | D win 87.7% | R+0.8 to D+16.6 | Published forecast |
| Oct 7 | D+7.9 | D win 87.7% | R+0.8 to D+16.6 | Published forecast |
| Oct 6 | D+7.9 | D win 87.8% | R+0.7 to D+16.6 | Published forecast |
| Oct 5 | D+8.0 | D win 87.8% | R+0.7 to D+16.7 | Published forecast |
| Oct 4 | D+8.0 | D win 87.9% | R+0.7 to D+16.7 | Published forecast |
| Oct 3 | D+8.0 | D win 88.0% | R+0.7 to D+16.7 | Published forecast |
| Oct 2 | D+8.0 | D win 88.4% | R+0.6 to D+16.7 | Published forecast |
| Oct 1 | D+8.1 | D win 88.3% | R+0.6 to D+16.8 | Published forecast |
| Sep 30 | D+8.1 | D win 88.3% | R+0.6 to D+16.8 | Published forecast |
| Sep 29 | D+8.1 | D win 88.3% | R+0.6 to D+16.8 | Published forecast |
| Sep 28 | D+8.2 | D win 88.4% | R+0.5 to D+16.8 | Published forecast |
| Sep 27 | D+8.2 | D win 88.8% | R+0.5 to D+16.9 | Published forecast |
| Sep 26 | D+8.2 | D win 88.3% | R+0.5 to D+16.9 | Published forecast |
| Sep 25 | D+8.2 | D win 88.8% | R+0.5 to D+16.9 | Published forecast |
| Sep 24 | D+8.2 | D win 88.7% | R+0.4 to D+16.9 | Published forecast |
| Sep 23 | D+8.3 | D win 88.8% | R+0.4 to D+16.9 | Published forecast |
| Sep 22 | D+8.3 | D win 88.9% | R+0.3 to D+17.0 | Published forecast |
| Sep 21 | D+8.3 | D win 88.9% | R+0.3 to D+17.0 | Published forecast |
| Sep 20 | D+8.3 | D win 89.0% | R+0.3 to D+17.0 | Published forecast |
| Sep 19 | D+8.4 | D win 89.0% | R+0.3 to D+17.0 | Published forecast |
| Sep 18 | D+8.4 | D win 89.3% | R+0.3 to D+17.1 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 17 | D+8.4 | D win 89.3% | R+0.3 to D+17.1 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 16 | D+8.4 | D win 89.6% | R+0.2 to D+17.1 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 15 | D+12.5 | D win 95.5% | D+3.5 to D+21.5 | Published forecast |
| Sep 14 | D+12.5 | D win 95.6% | D+3.6 to D+21.5 | Published forecast |
| Sep 13 | D+12.5 | D win 95.5% | D+3.6 to D+21.5 | Published forecast |
| Sep 12 | D+12.5 | D win 95.6% | D+3.6 to D+21.5 | Published forecast |
| Sep 11 | D+12.5 | D win 95.5% | D+3.6 to D+21.5 | Published forecast |
| Sep 10 | D+12.5 | D win 95.6% | D+3.6 to D+21.5 | Published forecast |
| Sep 9 | D+12.1 | D win 95.2% | D+3.1 to D+21.1 | Published forecast |
| Sep 8 | D+12.5 | D win 95.8% | D+3.6 to D+21.5 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 7 | D+13.3 | D win 96.0% | D+3.9 to D+22.6 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 6 | D+13.3 | D win 96.0% | D+3.9 to D+22.6 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 5 | D+14.3 | D win 97.0% | D+5.2 to D+23.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 4 | D+14.3 | D win 97.0% | D+5.2 to D+23.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 3 | D+14.3 | D win 97.0% | D+5.2 to D+23.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 2 | D+14.3 | D win 97.0% | D+5.2 to D+23.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Sep 1 | D+13.9 | D win 96.8% | D+4.8 to D+23.0 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 31 | D+13.9 | D win 96.8% | D+4.8 to D+23.0 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 30 | D+13.9 | D win 96.8% | D+4.8 to D+23.0 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 29 | D+13.9 | D win 96.8% | D+4.8 to D+23.0 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 28 | D+13.9 | D win 96.8% | D+4.8 to D+23.0 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 27 | D+13.9 | D win 96.8% | D+4.8 to D+23.0 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 26 | D+13.9 | D win 96.8% | D+4.8 to D+23.0 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 25 | D+13.9 | D win 96.8% | D+4.8 to D+23.0 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 24 | D+13.9 | D win 96.8% | D+4.8 to D+23.0 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 23 | D+13.9 | D win 96.8% | D+4.8 to D+23.0 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 22 | D+13.9 | D win 96.8% | D+4.8 to D+23.0 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 21 | D+13.9 | D win 96.7% | D+4.8 to D+23.0 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 20 | D+13.9 | D win 96.7% | D+4.8 to D+23.0 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 19 | D+13.9 | D win 96.7% | D+4.9 to D+23.0 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 18 | D+10.5 | D win 91.5% | D+0.8 to D+20.2 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 17 | D+10.5 | D win 91.5% | D+0.8 to D+20.2 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 16 | D+10.5 | D win 91.5% | D+0.8 to D+20.2 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 15 | D+10.5 | D win 91.5% | D+0.9 to D+20.2 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 14 | D+10.5 | D win 91.5% | D+0.8 to D+20.2 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 13 | D+10.5 | D win 91.5% | D+0.8 to D+20.2 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 12 | D+10.6 | D win 91.5% | D+0.9 to D+20.3 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 11 | D+10.6 | D win 91.5% | D+0.9 to D+20.3 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 10 | D+10.6 | D win 91.6% | D+0.9 to D+20.3 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 9 | D+10.6 | D win 91.6% | D+0.9 to D+20.3 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 8 | D+10.6 | D win 91.6% | D+0.9 to D+20.3 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 7 | D+10.6 | D win 91.6% | D+0.9 to D+20.3 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 6 | D+10.6 | D win 91.6% | D+0.9 to D+20.3 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 5 | D+10.6 | D win 91.6% | D+0.9 to D+20.3 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 4 | D+10.6 | D win 91.6% | D+0.9 to D+20.3 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 3 | D+10.6 | D win 91.6% | D+0.9 to D+20.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 2 | D+10.6 | D win 91.6% | D+0.9 to D+20.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
| Aug 1 | D+10.7 | D win 91.7% | D+0.9 to D+20.4 | Reconstructed with the stated inputs |
The polls
Poll average D+9.4A poll’s weight halves every 60 days and grows with its sample. Each pollster counts once, at its best release. Every poll counts at its published margin, sponsored or not.In governor races the forecast then counts a poll sponsored by a party or campaign at full weight and moves its margin 2 points against that party, which puts the average it reads at D+10.0. It then applies a fitted correction of 2.5 points toward Republicans for governor races, measured from past polling error, before blending it with its other evidence.12 recorded polls · 12 in the poll average
| Fieldwork | Added | Pollster | Result | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| from 2026-10-21 | 9h ago | Victory Insights ↗ | D+7.0D 50.1% · R 43.1% | 1,194 LV |
| from 2026-10-19 | 13h ago | The New York Times/Siena University ↗ | D+18.0D 55.92% · R 37.88% | 752 LV |
| from 2026-10-09 | SurveyUSA ↗KSTP-TV Minneapolis | D+7.0D 48% · R 41% | 718 LV | |
| from 2026-10-05 | Mason-Dixon Polling & Research, Inc. ↗KARE 11 | Minnesota Star Tribune | D+9.0D 50% · R 41% | 800 LV | |
| from 2026-10-02 | Morning Consult ↗The Daily Agenda | D+9.0D 48% · R 39% | 1,000 RV | |
| from 2026-09-14 | co/efficient ↗ | D+2.0D 47% · R 45% | 833 LV | |
| from 2026-09-09 | SurveyUSA ↗KSTP-TV Minneapolis | D+7.0D 47% · R 40% | 654 LV | |
| from 2026-08-31 | TIPP Insights ↗League of American Workers | D+9.8D 49.67% · R 39.83% | 1,192 LV |
Explore each poll’s weight in the average
Poll average D+9.4
- Published result
- D+18.0
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.73 · 16% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 19 Oct–26 Oct
- Sample
- 752 LV
- Sponsor
- Not listed
- Published result
- D+7.0
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.88 · 19% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 21 Oct–22 Oct
- Sample
- 1,194 LV
- Sponsor
- Republican sponsor · organization not listed
- Published result
- D+7.0
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.61 · 5.8% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 9 Oct–12 Oct
- Sample
- 718 LV
- Sponsor
- KSTP-TV Minneapolis
- Published result
- D+9.0
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.60 · 13% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 5 Oct–7 Oct
- Sample
- 800 LV
- Sponsor
- KARE 11 | Minnesota Star Tribune
- Published result
- D+9.0
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.68 · 15% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 2 Oct–7 Oct
- Sample
- 1,000 RV
- Sponsor
- The Daily Agenda
- Published result
- D+2.0
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.48 · 10% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 14 Sep–15 Sep
- Sample
- 833 LV
- Sponsor
- Not listed
- Published result
- D+7.0
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.42 · 4.0% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 9 Sep–14 Sep
- Sample
- 654 LV
- Sponsor
- KSTP-TV Minneapolis
- Published result
- D+9.8
- Weight in the poll average
- 0.49 · 11% of the average
- Fieldwork
- 31 Aug–2 Sep
- Sample
- 1,192 LV
- Sponsor
- League of American Workers
How the margin was built
Tap an input for its calculation and source.
Displayed values are rounded.
All calculations & sources
How this state voted, 2024 +4.260 points
The state's presidential margin in 2024 as a share of all votes cast, from our own county sums — the same measurement the model's statewide terrain center is built from. Every pull below is measured from here, not from EVEN, which is why a landslide seat's listed pulls are small numbers and still land where the forecast does.
- 2024 presidential result for this state, as a share of all votes cast, from Call the Map's own county sums.
- Same source as Act I's 2024-president reference mark, so the origin lands on it.
Fitted model, above the terrain shown +7.040 points
What the fitted model adds on top of the starting terrain above — incumbency, past results, campaign finance and the other fitted terms — measured from that terrain rather than from EVEN. It is a comparison with the starting point already shown, not a separate input. The source detail lists the variables the fit uses.
- Fitted baseline 11.300 minus starting point 4.260 = 7.040 points.
- Fitted intercept: -6.136 points.
- 2010 White population share used by the frozen historical fit: observed input 85.078. -0.503 × ((85.078 − 77.922) / 12.864) = -0.280 points.
- gov_midterm_wh: observed input -1.000. -0.987 × ((-1.000 − 0.336) / 0.739) = 1.785 points.
- 2024 presidential lean relative to the national result: observed input 5.844. 4.163 × ((5.844 − -4.415) / 20.258) = 2.108 points.
- Previous governor election margin: observed input 7.660. 1.755 × ((7.660 − -3.131) / 19.227) = 0.985 points.
- gov_inc_running_signed: observed input 0.000. 2.531 × ((0.000 − -0.120) / 0.708) = 0.428 points.
- gov_inc_tenure_signed: observed input 0.000. 3.340 × ((0.000 − -0.143) / 0.902) = 0.529 points.
- The displayed arithmetic is rounded; the fitted terms use full precision. The intercept plus these five terms gives the non-ratings baseline.
- No source-verified current Gallup reading supports the former 40% / July 2026 claim. The current Gallup series ends in 2025; the Presidency Project identifies its 2026 observations as other pollsters. Use the unchanged fitted missing-value rule, not a replacement polling scale.
- Certified 2024 presidential baseline: state D+4.3, national R+1.5; subtracting the national margin gives relative lean +5.8. Source: FEC compilation of certified state results.
Historical error calibration +1.940 points
A prior-election residual correction, when an admitted model publishes one.
- The forecast’s calibration against past governor results. The recorded contribution is +1.9.
National environment +1.832 points
The contribution to this race’s margin, not the national polling margin itself. The race’s loading, reference level and polling blend determine how much of the national climate reaches its final forecast.
- The national environment in this edition is D+8.4. This row is its contribution to the race’s prior, not a claim that the country is D+1.8.
- This step’s recorded contribution to the margin is +1.8.
- The elasticity is fitted on the pooled panel of contested governor races (2010–2024) with cycle-clustered standard errors; it is a measured response to the national environment, not a judgment floor.
This race’s polls −5.520 points
What this race’s own recent polling adds beyond its prior. The forecast weights each poll for recency and sample size and counts each pollster once; the weights listed here are those of the polls’ own average.
- The New York Times/Siena University (2026-10-26, n=752): D+18.0 · weight 0.73 in the poll average
- Victory Insights (2026-10-22, n=1,194): D+7.0 · weight 0.88 in the poll average
- SurveyUSA (2026-10-12, n=718): D+7.0 · weight 0.61 in the poll average
- Mason-Dixon Polling & Research, Inc. (2026-10-07, n=800): D+9.0 · weight 0.60 in the poll average
- Morning Consult (2026-10-07, n=1,000): D+9.0 · weight 0.68 in the poll average
- co/efficient (2026-09-15, n=833): D+2.0 · weight 0.48 in the poll average
- … and 6 more below.
- Poll average D+9.4, from 12 polls · 12 recorded polls. This is the polls’ own average, each poll at its published margin, the figure this page’s poll summary shows. In governor races the forecast then counts a poll sponsored by a party or campaign at full weight and moves its margin 2 points against that party, which puts the average it reads at D+10.0. It then applies a fitted correction of 2.5 points toward Republicans for governor races, measured from past polling error, before blending it with its other evidence. The forecast gives the polls 98% of the weight against its structural prior for this race, which moves the margin 5.5 points toward Republicans from where it stood before the polls. Eligible polls: latest poll: 2026-10-26 (2 days old).
Votes for other candidates −0.273 points
Every step above is measured between the two major-party candidates alone, as if nobody else were on the ballot. The forecast sets 2.9% of the vote aside for other candidates and write-ins, so as a share of every vote cast the gap between the two is smaller by that much. This step is exactly that: the two-party margin times the share going to other candidates. It is the same arithmetic that turns the two-party margin into the two shares printed at the top of the page.
The components this edition publishes for this race, in points. “Other factors” closes the sum to the two-party structural lean exactly. The margin the page prints is a share of every vote cast, so the “Votes for other candidates” row carries the exact difference between the two-party lean and that margin; with it, the walk sums to the printed margin exactly.
| Named factor | Contribution |
|---|---|
| FundamentalsThe admitted fitted baseline. Its surviving variables differ by office; the source detail above identifies those used for this race. | +11.30 |
| This race's pollsAdmitted head-to-head polls of this race, recency- and quality-weighted. | −5.52 |
| Historical calibrationThe House lane's calibration against certified past cycles. | +1.94 |
| National environmentThe national environment’s contribution to the prior. Polling can attenuate its influence; this value is not the national polling margin. | +1.83 |
| Other factors | 0.00 |
Where the votes are
The map of this race loads here.
Race context
- Turnout, 2018 midterm
- 63.1% 2,611,365 ballots
- Turnout, 2022 midterm
- 60.5% 2,526,646 ballots
- 2024 presidential margin
- D+4.3between the two parties
Turnout is ballots cast statewide as a share of the voting-eligible population. Source: University of Florida Election Lab ↗
Population profile
U.S. Census Bureau, 2022 American Community Survey 5-year estimates ↗
Coverage
5 quotes
- Buckle up because state government reporter Matthew Blake is sharing all his insights on Lisa Demuth's campaign.
We get into Demuth's record on fraud, why it's been difficult to cover her campaign as a reporter, and what happened when Blake reached out to Demuth's daughter for his story. ↗
MinnPost · Official · 11h ago
curated state newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match - Amy Klobuchar is the frontrunner for Minnesota governor, but Democrats are in a tough fight to secure both chambers of the legislature.
Neither party has room for error in contests that will decide whether Democrats hold the state governing trifecta or if the GOP blocks Klobuchar's agenda. ↗
The Downballot · Analysis · 13h ago
curated downballot newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match · election-topic match - Minnesota campaign finance regulators have dismissed a complaint filed by state Democrats over mailers that attacked Sen. Amy Klobuchar from the left. ↗
Minnesota Star Tribune · Official · 1d ago
curated newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match · election-topic match - House Speaker Lisa Demuth declined to say Monday whether she would pardon convicted murderer Derek Chauvin if she’s elected governor. ↗
Minnesota Reformer · Official · 2d ago
curated state newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match - Voters will still have to decide if Klobuchar is a demanding boss who gets the best out of people, or a someone who would struggle to oversee 50,000 state employees if elected Minnesota governor. ↗
Minnesota Reformer · Official · 6d ago
curated state newsroom · recent Bluesky post · named-race match · election-topic match
Forecast as of October 28, 2026: Call the Map currently has Amy Klobuchar ahead of Lisa Demuth by D+9.3, with a 92 in 100 chance to win. This is an open seat. That result would keep the seat with Democrats. The current poll average is D+9.4; 12 public polls are recorded.