Call
the Map
FORECAST51 DAYS OUT
governor3 November 2026 · 51 days out

Hannah Pingree is heavily favored to win. Projected candidate margin: Hannah Pingree over Bobby Charles by 12.7 points. No two-party forecast is published for this race: this race is between an independent and a major-party candidate, so the forecast is published per candidate rather than as a two-party margin.

Hannah Pingree (D)94 in 10094.5%49.7high 55.4 · low 43.4
Bobby Charles (R)5 in 1005.2%37.0high 42.7 · low 30.7
Rick Bennett (I)<1 in 1000.3%8.8high 16.5 · low 3.0
Show all others (1)
Other (minor parties / write-ins)4.5high 9.1 · low 1.3

Official ballot sources: Rick Bennett (checked 2026-08-31).

high / low: vote share (%) in the middle 80 in 100 simulations

About this field

Mills term-limited; blue-leaning open seat.

Forecast share averages the simulated vote. Win chance counts how often a candidate wins. A wider range of outcomes can give a candidate a higher win chance despite a lower average share.

Solid DOpen seat

The polls

Ledger weighted average D+12.7Used by the forecast: 3 polls (60-day half-life) · measured D+13.0 · after the fitted poll-error shift D+10.53 recorded polls · 3 eligible for the aggregate · 3 with positive weight

FieldworkAddedPollsterResultSample
from 2026-08-313d agoCNN/SSRSD+13.0D 52% · R 39%880 LV
from 2026-06-23Beacon Research/Shaw & Company ResearchFox NewsD+11.0D 53% · R 42%1,003 RV
from 2026-06-19The New York Times/Siena UniversityD+15.8D 55.38% · R 39.62%608 LV
Explore all 3 polls for this race

How the candidate lead was built

Follow each contribution to the margin. Wider ribbons mean more percentage points. Tap an input for its calculation and source.

Toward D+13.0
Toward R−0.4
Candidate leadD+12.7

The signed totals combine at the forecast. Displayed values are rounded. This is a modeled partisan coordinate.

Hannah Pingree leads Bobby Charles by 12.7 points (forecast share difference). The named candidate forecast also accounts for the field and election rules; its lead is a separate quantity from the partisan coordinate above.

The two-party D-versus-R coordinate, step by step

The walk above decomposes the published candidate lead. The model also carries a latent Democrat-minus-Republican coordinate, which is the quantity chamber seat and control arithmetic runs on. It is shown here at the same steps, as a secondary reading — it is not this race’s published forecast margin.

After this stepD−R coordinate
FundamentalsD+9.9
National environmentD+11.0
Campaign financeD+11.0
This race’s pollsD+10.6
Expert ratingsD+10.6
Election rules & guardsD+10.7
Historical calibrationD+13.1
The candidate fieldD+13.1
All calculations & sources

Fundamentals +8.568 points

What the fitted structural model contributes to the gap between the leader and the runner-up, before any of this cycle’s evidence.

Historical calibration +2.090 points

The calibration term fitted on past cycles, carried onto this gap.

The candidate field +1.319 points

What the field itself contributes: the third principals on the ballot and the election rule, which a two-party coordinate has nowhere to put.

National environment +0.991 points

How much of the national climate reaches this race’s leader-versus-runner-up gap.

Election rules & guards +0.068 points

Certified election-mechanics terms — ballot rules, guards and locks — as they bear on these two candidates.

This race’s polls −0.378 points

What this race’s admitted polls move the leader-versus-runner-up gap by.

These are the fitted model’s named contributions to the partisan coordinate, before the candidate-field calculation.

Named factorContribution
FundamentalsThe admitted fitted baseline. Its surviving variables differ by office; the source detail above identifies those used for this race.+9.89
Historical calibrationThe House lane's calibration against certified past cycles.+2.41
National environmentThe national environment’s contribution to the prior. Polling can attenuate its influence; this value is not the national polling margin.+1.14
This race's pollsAdmitted head-to-head polls of this race, recency- and quality-weighted.−0.44
Structural terrain safeguardA bounded pull toward presidential terrain in heavily partisan states.+0.08
Other factors0.00

Race context

Forecast votes cast
658,212
Forecast turnout
57.7% of the voting-eligible population
2024 presidential margin
D+7.1

Statewide, 58.4% of the voting-eligible population is projected to cast a ballot; the lower figure above is the share projected to vote in this race.

Population profile Select a measure for its source and denominator

White alone · 92.3%1,261,284 of 1,366,949 · Residents2022 Census · matched race geography

Coverage