Call
the Map
FORECAST51 DAYS OUT
governor3 November 2026 · 51 days out

Keisha Lance Bottoms has a slight edge to lead Georgia’s first round. Predicted margin: D+2.0.

Keisha Lance Bottoms (D)59 in 10059.1%50.5high 55.1 · low 45.9
Rick Jackson (R)41 in 10040.9%48.5high 53.1 · low 43.9
Other (minor parties / write-ins)1.0high 2.0 · low 0.3

high / low: vote share (%) in the middle 80 in 100 simulations

About this field

Kemp term-limited. Bottoms vs. political newcomer Rick Jackson, who beat Lt. Gov. Burt Jones in a June GOP upset.

Forecast share averages the simulated vote. Win chance counts how often a candidate wins. A wider range of outcomes can give a candidate a higher win chance despite a lower average share.

Tilt D80% range · first-choice margin R+6.9 to D+10.9Open seat

Forecast history

Steady0.0 pts · Sep 11 → Sep 13Georgia Governor: steady — the published margin moved 0.0 points between the Sep 11 and Sep 13 editions (3 of 5 stored editions). This is movement of the published forecast between editions.
EVENAug 1Nov 3 · Election Day

Latest reading · Sep 13 · first published Sep 9 · 80% range · margin points R+6.9 to D+10.9. Methodology

Hover the line, tap it, or use the arrow keys to inspect its history.

About this series

This comparable series begins on September 9, 2026, when the model version changed to CTMM 2.2. Earlier readings remain in the archive and are not joined as voter movement; faded points before September 9, 2026 are reconstructions, not forecasts issued on those days.

Faded: CTMM 2.2 reconstructed history: computed after the fact with each date's available polls and environment, without expert ratings; not an issued forecast. Issued forecasts begin at the launch marker.

The polls

Ledger weighted average D+1.9Used by the forecast: 8 polls (60-day half-life) · measured D+2.9 · after the fitted poll-error shift D+0.48 recorded polls · 8 eligible for the aggregate · 8 with positive weight

FieldworkAddedPollsterResultSample
from 2026-08-16InsiderAdvantageJames Magazine OnlineR+0.1D 46.2% · R 46.3%800 LV
from 2026-07-29Quantus InsightsNatural Gas Association of GeorgiaD+1.5D 46.4% · R 44.9%815 LV
from 2026-07-13Fabrizio Ward/Impact ResearchAARPD+2.0D 48% · R 46%1,060 LV
from 2026-07-10State NavigateD+7.0D 51% · R 44%448 LV
from 2026-06-27WickR+0.5D 42.7% · R 43.2%1,175 LV
from 2026-06-23Beacon Research/Shaw & Company ResearchFox NewsD+5.0D 52% · R 47%1,002 RV
from 2026-05-30Concord Public Opinion PartnersEducation Reform Now AdvocacyD+15.0D 53% · R 38%510 LV
from 2026-04-03Echelon InsightsNetChoiceD+6.0D 49% · R 43%407 LV
Explore poll adjustments

8 of 8 matching · 8 total

Ledger weighted average D+1.9

InsiderAdvantage17 Aug · 800 LV · added 19 Aug
Quantus Insights1 Aug · 815 LV · added 19 Aug
Fabrizio Ward/Impact Research16 Jul · 1,060 LV · added 19 Aug
State Navigate13 Jul · 448 LV · added 19 Aug
Wick30 Jun · 1,175 LV · added 19 Aug
Beacon Research/Shaw & Company Research27 Jun · 1,002 RV · added 19 Aug
Concord Public Opinion Partners2 Jun · 510 LV · added 19 Aug
Echelon Insights9 Apr · 407 LV · added 19 Aug
Explore all 8 polls for this race

How the margin was built

Follow each contribution to the margin. Wider ribbons mean more percentage points. Tap an input for its calculation and source.

Toward D+7.7
Toward R−5.7
Forecast marginD+2.0

The signed totals combine at the forecast. Displayed values are rounded.

All calculations & sources

How this state voted, 2024 −2.190 points

The state's two-party presidential margin in 2024, from our own county sums — the same measurement the model's statewide terrain center is built from. Every pull below is measured from here, not from EVEN, which is why a landslide seat's listed pulls are small numbers and still land where the forecast does.

  • 2024 presidential result for this state, two-party, from Call the Map's own county sums.
  • Same source as Act I's 2024-president reference mark, so the origin lands on it.

Fitted model, above the terrain shown +5.662 points

What the fitted model adds on top of the starting terrain above — incumbency, past results, campaign finance and the other fitted terms — measured from that terrain rather than from EVEN. It is a comparison with the starting point already shown, not a separate input. The source detail lists the variables the fit uses.

  • Fitted baseline 3.472 minus starting point -2.190 = 5.662 points.
  • Fitted intercept: -6.136 points.
  • 2010 White population share used by the frozen historical fit: observed input 59.823. -0.503 × ((59.823 − 77.922) / 12.864) = 0.707 points.
  • gov_midterm_wh: observed input -1.000. -0.987 × ((-1.000 − 0.336) / 0.739) = 1.785 points.
  • 2024 presidential lean relative to the national result: observed input -0.709. 4.163 × ((-0.709 − -4.415) / 20.258) = 0.762 points.
  • Previous governor election margin: observed input -7.540. 1.755 × ((-7.540 − -3.131) / 19.227) = -0.403 points.
  • gov_inc_running_signed: observed input 0.000. 2.531 × ((0.000 − -0.120) / 0.708) = 0.428 points.
  • gov_inc_tenure_signed: observed input 0.000. 3.340 × ((0.000 − -0.143) / 0.902) = 0.529 points.
  • The displayed arithmetic is rounded; the fitted terms use full precision. The intercept plus these five terms gives the non-ratings baseline.
  • No source-verified current Gallup reading supports the former 40% / July 2026 claim. The current Gallup series ends in 2025; the Presidency Project identifies its 2026 observations as other pollsters. Use the unchanged fitted missing-value rule, not a replacement polling scale.
  • Certified 2024 presidential baseline: state R+2.2, national R+1.5; subtracting the national margin gives relative lean −0.7. Source: FEC compilation of certified state results.

National environment +1.143 points

The contribution to this race’s margin, not the national polling margin itself. The race’s loading, reference level and polling blend determine how much of the national climate reaches its final forecast.

  • The national environment in this edition is D+7.6. This row is its contribution to the race’s prior, not a claim that the country is D+1.1.
  • The environment enters once, through the fitted governor elasticity: 0.4216 × (7.600 − 1.882, the environment the governor priors themselves imply) = +2.4; the producer rounds the contribution to +2.4.
  • Polls receive 70.2% of the blend. They attenuate this contribution to +0.7 in the final center; the offset is included in the polling row.
  • The elasticity is fitted on the pooled panel of contested governor races (2010–2024) with cycle-clustered standard errors; it is a measured response to the national environment, not a judgment floor.

Historical error calibration +0.932 points

A prior-election residual correction, when an admitted model publishes one.

  • No separate historical residual correction is published in this governor edition.

This race’s polls −3.533 points

What this race’s own recent polling adds beyond its prior, after each poll is weighted for recency, sample size and pollster quality.

  • 8 poll(s) / 8 pollster(s)
  • The admitted polling average is D+1.9, after pollster, sample and recency adjustments.
  • Polling contribution = 70.2% × (1.897 − prior 1.000) = −3.5 points after component rounding.
  • The prior includes national environment and expert ratings. The blend is D+1.6 before the separately disclosed candidate and formula adjustments.

The components this edition publishes for this race, in points. “Other factors” closes the sum to the two-party structural lean exactly. Here the structural lean IS the published margin, so the walk sums to the projection exactly; nothing is left over.

Named factorContribution
This race's pollsAdmitted head-to-head polls of this race, recency- and quality-weighted.−3.53
FundamentalsThe admitted fitted baseline. Its surviving variables differ by office; the source detail above identifies those used for this race.+3.47
National environmentThe national environment’s contribution to the prior. Polling can attenuate its influence; this value is not the national polling margin.+1.14
Historical calibrationThe House lane's calibration against certified past cycles.+0.93
Other factors0.00

Race context

Forecast votes cast
3,944,041
Forecast turnout
49.6% of the voting-eligible population
2024 presidential margin
R+2.2

Statewide, 50.2% of the voting-eligible population is projected to cast a ballot; the lower figure above is the share projected to vote in this race.

Population profile Select a measure for its source and denominator

White alone · 54.3%5,820,019 of 10,722,325 · Residents2022 Census · matched race geography

Coverage

7 stories · 3 quotes

All coverage and full posts on the Wire →