Call
the Map
Forecast5 days out
← GovernorsNovember 3, 2026

Florida · Governor

Byron Donalds is heavily favored to keep the Florida governorship in Republican hands. Predicted margin: R+7.3.

David Jolly (D)13 in 10046.041.8–50.1
Byron Donalds (R)87 in 10053.349.1–57.4

Under each share, its likely range (80 in 100 simulations)

Background

DeSantis is term-limited: David Jolly (D) faces Byron Donalds (R).

Likely ROpen seat

Forecast history

Steady+0.1 pts · Oct 26 → Oct 28Florida Governor: steady — the published margin moved +0.1 points between the Oct 26 and Oct 28 editions (3 of 47 stored editions). This is movement of the published forecast between editions.
EVENR+5Aug 1Nov 3 · Election Day

Latest reading · Oct 28 · first published Sep 9 · 80% range · margin points R+15.6 to D+1.0. Methodology

 

About this series

Reconstructed with the current model Aug 1 – Sep 8 and Sep 16 – Sep 18; published readings Sep 9 – Oct 28. Each reconstructed day is the current model on that day’s own inputs, not a forecast published then. Corrections are dated in the changelog.

Faded: CTMM 2.2 reconstructed history: computed after the fact with each date's available polls and environment, without expert ratings; not an issued forecast. Issued forecasts begin at the launch marker.

CTMM 2.2 readings for 2026-09-16, 2026-09-17, 2026-09-18 were computed after the fact with each day's available inputs: no edition was issued on those days. Not an issued forecast.

Data table
DateMarginChance80% rangeReading
Oct 28R+7.3R win 86.6%R+15.6 to D+1.0Published forecast
Oct 27R+7.3R win 86.5%R+15.6 to D+1.1Published forecast
Oct 26R+7.4R win 86.7%R+15.7 to D+1.0Published forecast
Oct 25R+7.4R win 86.7%R+15.7 to D+1.0Published forecast
Oct 24R+7.3R win 86.6%R+15.7 to D+1.0Published forecast
Oct 23R+7.3R win 86.5%R+15.7 to D+1.0Published forecast
Oct 22R+7.3R win 86.4%R+15.7 to D+1.0Published forecast
Oct 21R+6.8R win 84.8%R+15.2 to D+1.5Published forecast
Oct 20R+7.0R win 85.6%R+15.4 to D+1.3Published forecast
Oct 19R+6.8R win 84.6%R+15.2 to D+1.6Published forecast
Oct 18R+6.8R win 84.5%R+15.1 to D+1.6Published forecast
Oct 17R+6.8R win 84.5%R+15.1 to D+1.6Published forecast
Oct 16R+6.7R win 84.6%R+15.1 to D+1.7Published forecast
Oct 15R+6.7R win 84.6%R+15.1 to D+1.7Published forecast
Oct 14R+7.0R win 85.4%R+15.4 to D+1.4Published forecast
Oct 13R+6.8R win 84.8%R+15.2 to D+1.6Published forecast
Oct 12R+6.8R win 84.7%R+15.2 to D+1.7Published forecast
Oct 11R+6.8R win 84.7%R+15.2 to D+1.7Published forecast
Oct 10R+7.5R win 87.0%R+15.9 to D+0.9Published forecast
Oct 9R+7.5R win 86.9%R+15.9 to D+1.0Published forecast
Oct 8R+6.4R win 83.2%R+14.8 to D+2.1Published forecast
Oct 7R+6.4R win 83.2%R+14.8 to D+2.1Published forecast
Oct 6R+5.8R win 81.0%R+14.3 to D+2.7Published forecast
Oct 5R+5.8R win 81.2%R+14.3 to D+2.7Published forecast
Oct 4R+5.8R win 81.7%R+14.3 to D+2.7Published forecast
Oct 3R+5.8R win 81.3%R+14.3 to D+2.7Published forecast
Oct 2R+5.8R win 81.2%R+14.3 to D+2.7Published forecast
Oct 1R+5.8R win 81.0%R+14.3 to D+2.7Published forecast
Sep 30R+5.8R win 80.8%R+14.3 to D+2.7Published forecast
Sep 29R+5.8R win 81.1%R+14.3 to D+2.7Published forecast
Sep 28R+6.0R win 81.8%R+14.5 to D+2.5Published forecast
Sep 27R+6.0R win 81.6%R+14.5 to D+2.5Published forecast
Sep 26R+6.0R win 81.8%R+14.5 to D+2.5Published forecast
Sep 25R+6.0R win 81.6%R+14.5 to D+2.5Published forecast
Sep 24R+4.5R win 75.0%R+13.1 to D+4.1Published forecast
Sep 23R+4.5R win 75.0%R+13.1 to D+4.1Published forecast
Sep 22R+4.5R win 75.3%R+13.1 to D+4.1Published forecast
Sep 21R+4.5R win 75.3%R+13.1 to D+4.1Published forecast
Sep 20R+4.5R win 75.0%R+13.1 to D+4.1Published forecast
Sep 19R+4.5R win 75.2%R+13.1 to D+4.1Published forecast
Sep 18R+4.5R win 74.8%R+13.0 to D+4.1Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 17R+5.0R win 77.0%R+13.7 to D+3.8Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 16R+5.0R win 76.9%R+13.7 to D+3.8Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 15R+5.0R win 77.1%R+13.7 to D+3.7Published forecast
Sep 14R+5.0R win 76.8%R+13.7 to D+3.7Published forecast
Sep 13R+5.0R win 77.3%R+13.7 to D+3.7Published forecast
Sep 12R+5.0R win 77.2%R+13.7 to D+3.7Published forecast
Sep 11R+5.0R win 77.0%R+13.7 to D+3.7Published forecast
Sep 10R+5.0R win 77.2%R+13.7 to D+3.7Published forecast
Sep 9R+5.7R win 79.5%R+14.5 to D+3.2Published forecast
Sep 8R+5.8R win 80.4%R+14.6 to D+3.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 7R+5.8R win 80.4%R+14.7 to D+3.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 6R+5.8R win 80.4%R+14.6 to D+3.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 5R+5.7R win 79.9%R+14.5 to D+3.1Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 4R+5.7R win 79.9%R+14.5 to D+3.1Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 3R+5.7R win 79.9%R+14.5 to D+3.1Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 2R+5.7R win 79.9%R+14.5 to D+3.1Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 1R+5.9R win 80.8%R+14.7 to D+2.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 31R+5.9R win 80.8%R+14.7 to D+2.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 30R+5.9R win 80.8%R+14.7 to D+2.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 29R+5.9R win 80.7%R+14.7 to D+2.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 28R+5.9R win 80.7%R+14.7 to D+2.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 27R+5.9R win 80.7%R+14.6 to D+2.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 26R+5.9R win 80.7%R+14.6 to D+2.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 25R+5.9R win 80.7%R+14.6 to D+2.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 24R+5.9R win 80.6%R+14.6 to D+2.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 23R+5.9R win 80.7%R+14.6 to D+2.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 22R+5.9R win 80.8%R+14.7 to D+2.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 21R+5.6R win 79.2%R+14.4 to D+3.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 20R+5.6R win 79.2%R+14.4 to D+3.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 19R+5.6R win 79.1%R+14.4 to D+3.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 18R+6.3R win 81.8%R+15.3 to D+2.6Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 17R+6.3R win 81.8%R+15.3 to D+2.6Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 16R+6.3R win 81.8%R+15.3 to D+2.6Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 15R+6.3R win 81.7%R+15.2 to D+2.6Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 14R+6.3R win 81.8%R+15.2 to D+2.6Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 13R+5.9R win 79.7%R+14.9 to D+3.1Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 12R+5.9R win 79.7%R+14.9 to D+3.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 11R+5.9R win 79.7%R+14.9 to D+3.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 10R+5.9R win 79.7%R+14.9 to D+3.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 9R+5.9R win 79.6%R+14.9 to D+3.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 8R+5.9R win 79.6%R+14.9 to D+3.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 7R+5.8R win 79.6%R+14.9 to D+3.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 6R+5.9R win 79.7%R+14.9 to D+3.1Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 5R+5.9R win 79.7%R+14.9 to D+3.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 4R+5.9R win 79.7%R+14.9 to D+3.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 3R+5.9R win 79.6%R+14.9 to D+3.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 2R+5.9R win 79.6%R+14.9 to D+3.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 1R+5.8R win 79.6%R+14.9 to D+3.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs

The polls

Poll average R+4.7A poll’s weight halves every 60 days and grows with its sample. Each pollster counts once, at its best release. Every poll counts at its published margin, sponsored or not.In governor races the forecast then counts a poll sponsored by a party or campaign at full weight and moves its margin 2 points against that party, which puts the average it reads at R+4.6. It then applies a fitted correction of 2.5 points toward Republicans for governor races, measured from past polling error, before blending it with its other evidence.39 recorded polls · 37 in the poll average

FieldworkAddedPollsterResultSample
from 2026-10-2514h agoSt. Pete Polls ↗R+2.3D 45.5% · R 47.8%916 LV
from 2026-10-1914h agoThe New York Times/Siena University ↗R+3.9D 44.43% · R 48.36%813 LV
from 2026-10-161d agoEchelon Insights ↗R+6.0D 44% · R 50%515 LV
from 2026-10-202d agoRedBox Research ↗R+5.0D 44% · R 49%4,832 LV
from 2026-10-187d agoco/efficient ↗R+9.0D 40% · R 49%1,014 LV
from 2026-10-12University of North Florida ↗R+2.0D 47% · R 49%1,471 LV
from 2026-10-01ActiVote ↗R+3.4D 48.3% · R 51.7%400 LV
from 2026-10-02YouGov ↗R+8.0D 42% · R 50%825 RV
Explore each poll’s weight in the average

8 of 39 matching · 39 total

Poll average R+4.7

St. Pete Polls27 Oct · 916 LV · added 28 Oct
The New York Times/Siena University25 Oct · 813 LV · added 28 Oct
Echelon Insights23 Oct · 515 LV · added 27 Oct
RedBox Research23 Oct · 4,832 LV · added 26 Oct
co/efficient20 Oct · 1,014 LV · added 22 Oct
ActiVote19 Oct · 400 LV · added 20 Oct
University of North Florida19 Oct · 1,471 LV · added 21 Oct
YouGov15 Oct · 825 RV · added 19 Oct
Explore all 39 polls for this race

How the margin was built

Tap an input for its calculation and source.

Toward D+9.7
Toward R−17.0
Forecast marginR+7.3

Displayed values are rounded.

All calculations & sources

How this state voted, 2024 −13.100 points

The state's presidential margin in 2024 as a share of all votes cast, from our own county sums — the same measurement the model's statewide terrain center is built from. Every pull below is measured from here, not from EVEN, which is why a landslide seat's listed pulls are small numbers and still land where the forecast does.

  • 2024 presidential result for this state, as a share of all votes cast, from Call the Map's own county sums.
  • Same source as Act I's 2024-president reference mark, so the origin lands on it.

Fitted model, above the terrain shown +7.781 points

What the fitted model adds on top of the starting terrain above — incumbency, past results, campaign finance and the other fitted terms — measured from that terrain rather than from EVEN. It is a comparison with the starting point already shown, not a separate input. The source detail lists the variables the fit uses.

  • Fitted baseline -5.319 minus starting point -13.100 = 7.781 points.
  • Fitted intercept: -6.136 points.
  • 2010 White population share used by the frozen historical fit: observed input 75.083. -0.503 × ((75.083 − 77.922) / 12.864) = 0.111 points.
  • gov_midterm_wh: observed input -1.000. -0.987 × ((-1.000 − 0.336) / 0.739) = 1.785 points.
  • 2024 presidential lean relative to the national result: observed input -11.722. 4.163 × ((-11.722 − -4.415) / 20.258) = -1.502 points.
  • Previous governor election margin: observed input -19.400. 1.755 × ((-19.400 − -3.131) / 19.227) = -1.485 points.
  • gov_inc_running_signed: observed input 0.000. 2.531 × ((0.000 − -0.120) / 0.708) = 0.428 points.
  • gov_inc_tenure_signed: observed input 0.000. 3.340 × ((0.000 − -0.143) / 0.902) = 0.529 points.
  • The displayed arithmetic is rounded; the fitted terms use full precision. The intercept plus these five terms gives the non-ratings baseline.
  • No source-verified current Gallup reading supports the former 40% / July 2026 claim. The current Gallup series ends in 2025; the Presidency Project identifies its 2026 observations as other pollsters. Use the unchanged fitted missing-value rule, not a replacement polling scale.
  • Certified 2024 presidential baseline: state R+13.2, national R+1.5; subtracting the national margin gives relative lean −11.7. Source: FEC compilation of certified state results.

National environment +1.832 points

The contribution to this race’s margin, not the national polling margin itself. The race’s loading, reference level and polling blend determine how much of the national climate reaches its final forecast.

  • The national environment in this edition is D+8.4. This row is its contribution to the race’s prior, not a claim that the country is D+1.8.
  • This step’s recorded contribution to the margin is +1.8.
  • The elasticity is fitted on the pooled panel of contested governor races (2010–2024) with cycle-clustered standard errors; it is a measured response to the national environment, not a judgment floor.

This race’s polls −3.559 points

What this race’s own recent polling adds beyond its prior. The forecast weights each poll for recency and sample size and counts each pollster once; the weights listed here are those of the polls’ own average.

  • St. Pete Polls (2026-10-27, n=916): R+2.3 · weight 0.81 in the poll average
  • The New York Times/Siena University (2026-10-25, n=813): R+3.9 · weight 0.75 in the poll average
  • RedBox Research (2026-10-23, n=4,832): R+5.0 · weight 0.94 in the poll average
  • Echelon Insights (2026-10-23, n=515): R+6.0 · weight 0.58 in the poll average
  • co/efficient (2026-10-20, n=1,014): R+9.0 · weight 0.79 in the poll average
  • University of North Florida (2026-10-19, n=1,471): R+2.0 · weight 0.90 in the poll average
  • … and 33 more below.
  • Poll average R+4.7, from 37 polls · 39 recorded polls. This is the polls’ own average, each poll at its published margin, the figure this page’s poll summary shows. In governor races the forecast then counts a poll sponsored by a party or campaign at full weight and moves its margin 2 points against that party, which puts the average it reads at R+4.6. It then applies a fitted correction of 2.5 points toward Republicans for governor races, measured from past polling error, before blending it with its other evidence. The forecast gives the polls 98% of the weight against its structural prior for this race, which moves the margin 3.6 points toward Republicans from where it stood before the polls. Eligible polls: latest poll: 2026-10-27 (2 days old).

Historical error calibration −0.323 points

A prior-election residual correction, when an admitted model publishes one.

  • The forecast’s calibration against past governor results. The recorded contribution is −0.3.

Votes for other candidates +0.057 points

Every step above is measured between the two major-party candidates alone, as if nobody else were on the ballot. The forecast sets 0.8% of the vote aside for other candidates and write-ins, so as a share of every vote cast the gap between the two is smaller by that much. This step is exactly that: the two-party margin times the share going to other candidates. It is the same arithmetic that turns the two-party margin into the two shares printed at the top of the page.

The components this edition publishes for this race, in points. “Other factors” closes the sum to the two-party structural lean exactly. The margin the page prints is a share of every vote cast, so the “Votes for other candidates” row carries the exact difference between the two-party lean and that margin; with it, the walk sums to the printed margin exactly.

Named factorContribution
FundamentalsThe admitted fitted baseline. Its surviving variables differ by office; the source detail above identifies those used for this race.−5.32
This race's pollsAdmitted head-to-head polls of this race, recency- and quality-weighted.−3.56
National environmentThe national environment’s contribution to the prior. Polling can attenuate its influence; this value is not the national polling margin.+1.83
Historical calibrationThe House lane's calibration against certified past cycles.−0.32
Other factors0.00

Where the votes are

The map of this race loads here.

Race context

Turnout, 2018 midterm
53.5% 8,318,824 ballots
Turnout, 2022 midterm
48.2% 7,796,916 ballots
2024 presidential margin
R+13.2between the two parties

Turnout is ballots cast statewide as a share of the voting-eligible population. Source: University of Florida Election Lab ↗

Population profile

White alone · 63.8%13,807,410 of 21,634,529 · Residents2022 Census · matched race geography

Coverage

Forecast as of October 28, 2026: Call the Map currently has Byron Donalds ahead of David Jolly by R+7.3, with an 87 in 100 chance to win. This is an open seat. That result would keep the seat with Republicans. The current poll average is R+4.7; 39 public polls are recorded.