Call
the Map
Forecast5 days out
← GovernorsNovember 3, 2026

Arizona · Governor

Katie Hobbs is heavily favored to hold the Arizona governorship. Predicted margin: D+6.2.

Katie Hobbs incumbent (D)86 in 10051.848.3–55.4
Andy Biggs (R)14 in 10045.642.0–49.2

Under each share, its likely range (80 in 100 simulations) · * incumbent

Background

Hobbs seeks a second term against Andy Biggs (R).

Likely DDemocratic-held seat

Forecast history

Moving R · mild-0.7 pts · Oct 26 → Oct 28Arizona Governor: moving toward the Republican, mild — the published margin moved -0.7 points between the Oct 26 and Oct 28 editions (3 of 47 stored editions). This is movement of the published forecast between editions.
D+10D+5EVENAug 1Nov 3 · Election Day

Latest reading · Oct 28 · first published Sep 9 · 80% range · margin points R+0.9 to D+13.4. Methodology

 

About this series

Reconstructed with the current model Aug 1 – Sep 8 and Sep 16 – Sep 18; published readings Sep 9 – Oct 28. Each reconstructed day is the current model on that day’s own inputs, not a forecast published then. Corrections are dated in the changelog.

Faded: CTMM 2.2 reconstructed history: computed after the fact with each date's available polls and environment, without expert ratings; not an issued forecast. Issued forecasts begin at the launch marker.

CTMM 2.2 readings for 2026-09-16, 2026-09-17, 2026-09-18 were computed after the fact with each day's available inputs: no edition was issued on those days. Not an issued forecast.

Data table
DateMarginChance80% rangeReading
Oct 28D+6.2D win 86.4%R+0.9 to D+13.4Published forecast
Oct 27D+6.9D win 88.8%R+0.2 to D+14.1Published forecast
Oct 26D+7.0D win 88.8%R+0.2 to D+14.1Published forecast
Oct 25D+7.0D win 88.8%R+0.2 to D+14.2Published forecast
Oct 24D+7.0D win 88.9%R+0.2 to D+14.2Published forecast
Oct 23D+7.0D win 88.7%R+0.2 to D+14.2Published forecast
Oct 22D+7.0D win 88.8%R+0.2 to D+14.2Published forecast
Oct 21D+7.0D win 88.8%R+0.2 to D+14.2Published forecast
Oct 20D+7.0D win 88.8%R+0.2 to D+14.2Published forecast
Oct 19D+6.3D win 86.5%R+0.9 to D+13.5Published forecast
Oct 18D+6.3D win 86.5%R+0.9 to D+13.5Published forecast
Oct 17D+6.4D win 86.6%R+0.9 to D+13.6Published forecast
Oct 16D+6.4D win 86.7%R+0.8 to D+13.6Published forecast
Oct 15D+6.4D win 86.7%R+0.8 to D+13.6Published forecast
Oct 14D+6.4D win 86.8%R+0.8 to D+13.6Published forecast
Oct 13D+6.2D win 86.2%R+1.0 to D+13.5Published forecast
Oct 12D+6.3D win 86.3%R+1.0 to D+13.5Published forecast
Oct 11D+6.3D win 86.3%R+1.0 to D+13.5Published forecast
Oct 10D+6.2D win 86.0%R+1.0 to D+13.5Published forecast
Oct 9D+6.2D win 86.0%R+1.0 to D+13.5Published forecast
Oct 8D+7.2D win 89.2%R+0.1 to D+14.4Published forecast
Oct 7D+7.2D win 89.2%R+0.1 to D+14.5Published forecast
Oct 6D+6.2D win 86.2%R+1.1 to D+13.6Published forecast
Oct 5D+6.3D win 86.1%R+1.1 to D+13.6Published forecast
Oct 4D+6.3D win 86.1%R+1.0 to D+13.6Published forecast
Oct 3D+6.3D win 86.4%R+1.0 to D+13.6Published forecast
Oct 2D+6.3D win 86.5%R+1.0 to D+13.6Published forecast
Oct 1D+6.3D win 86.5%R+1.0 to D+13.6Published forecast
Sep 30D+6.3D win 86.4%R+1.0 to D+13.6Published forecast
Sep 29D+6.4D win 86.5%R+1.0 to D+13.7Published forecast
Sep 28D+6.4D win 86.6%R+0.9 to D+13.7Published forecast
Sep 27D+6.4D win 86.8%R+0.9 to D+13.7Published forecast
Sep 26D+6.4D win 86.5%R+0.9 to D+13.7Published forecast
Sep 25D+6.4D win 86.8%R+0.9 to D+13.7Published forecast
Sep 24D+6.4D win 86.8%R+0.9 to D+13.8Published forecast
Sep 23D+6.4D win 86.8%R+0.9 to D+13.8Published forecast
Sep 22D+6.5D win 86.7%R+0.9 to D+13.8Published forecast
Sep 21D+6.5D win 86.7%R+0.9 to D+13.8Published forecast
Sep 20D+6.5D win 87.0%R+0.9 to D+13.8Published forecast
Sep 19D+6.5D win 87.0%R+0.9 to D+13.9Published forecast
Sep 18D+6.5D win 87.3%R+0.8 to D+13.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 17D+6.5D win 87.3%R+0.8 to D+13.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 16D+6.6D win 86.3%R+0.8 to D+13.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 15D+6.6D win 85.9%R+0.8 to D+13.9Published forecast
Sep 14D+6.6D win 86.3%R+0.8 to D+14.0Published forecast
Sep 13D+6.6D win 86.1%R+0.8 to D+14.0Published forecast
Sep 12D+6.6D win 86.2%R+0.8 to D+14.0Published forecast
Sep 11D+6.6D win 86.5%R+0.8 to D+14.0Published forecast
Sep 10D+6.6D win 86.5%R+0.8 to D+14.0Published forecast
Sep 9D+6.8D win 87.0%R+0.6 to D+14.2Published forecast
Sep 8D+6.6D win 86.6%R+0.8 to D+14.1Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 7D+6.6D win 86.6%R+0.8 to D+14.1Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 6D+6.7D win 86.6%R+0.8 to D+14.1Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 5D+6.4D win 85.8%R+1.0 to D+13.8Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 4D+6.4D win 85.9%R+1.0 to D+13.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 3D+6.4D win 85.9%R+1.0 to D+13.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 2D+6.5D win 86.0%R+1.0 to D+13.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Sep 1D+6.7D win 86.8%R+0.7 to D+14.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 31D+6.7D win 86.9%R+0.7 to D+14.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 30D+6.7D win 86.9%R+0.7 to D+14.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 29D+6.8D win 86.9%R+0.7 to D+14.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 28D+6.8D win 87.0%R+0.7 to D+14.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 27D+6.8D win 87.0%R+0.7 to D+14.3Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 26D+6.9D win 87.2%R+0.6 to D+14.3Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 25D+6.9D win 87.3%R+0.6 to D+14.4Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 24D+6.4D win 85.7%R+1.1 to D+13.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 23D+6.2D win 85.1%R+1.3 to D+13.7Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 22D+6.4D win 85.7%R+1.1 to D+13.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 21D+6.4D win 85.0%R+1.1 to D+13.9Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 20D+6.4D win 85.1%R+1.1 to D+14.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 19D+6.8D win 86.1%R+0.8 to D+14.5Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 18D+6.9D win 86.1%R+0.8 to D+14.5Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 17D+6.9D win 86.2%R+0.8 to D+14.6Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 16D+7.3D win 87.2%R+0.5 to D+15.1Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 15D+7.3D win 87.2%R+0.5 to D+15.1Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 14D+7.3D win 87.2%R+0.5 to D+15.1Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 13D+8.9D win 90.8%D+0.7 to D+17.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 12D+8.9D win 90.8%D+0.8 to D+17.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 11D+8.9D win 90.8%D+0.8 to D+17.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 10D+8.9D win 90.8%D+0.8 to D+17.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 9D+8.9D win 90.8%D+0.8 to D+17.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 8D+8.9D win 90.8%D+0.8 to D+17.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 7D+8.9D win 90.9%D+0.8 to D+17.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 6D+8.9D win 90.8%D+0.8 to D+17.0Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 5D+9.8D win 92.2%D+1.4 to D+18.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 4D+9.8D win 92.2%D+1.4 to D+18.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 3D+9.8D win 92.2%D+1.4 to D+18.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 2D+9.8D win 92.1%D+1.4 to D+18.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs
Aug 1D+9.8D win 92.1%D+1.4 to D+18.2Reconstructed with the stated inputs

The polls

Poll average D+7.4A poll’s weight halves every 60 days and grows with its sample. Each pollster counts once, at its best release. Every poll counts at its published margin, sponsored or not.In governor races the forecast then counts a poll sponsored by a party or campaign at full weight and moves its margin 2 points against that party, which puts the average it reads at D+7.3. It then applies a fitted correction of 2.5 points toward Republicans for governor races, measured from past polling error, before blending it with its other evidence.30 recorded polls · 24 in the poll average

FieldworkAddedPollsterResultSample
from 2026-10-211d agoHighGround ↗D+12.2D 51.5% · R 39.3%400 LV
from 2026-10-201d agoRedBox Research (D) ↗D+5.0D 47% · R 42%2,686 LV
from 2026-10-185d agoGrayHouse ↗D+6.0D 51% · R 45%550 LV
from 2026-09-18BSP Research ↗D+13.0D 47% · R 34%1,300 RV
from 2026-10-03Wick ↗D+5.7D 48.9% · R 43.2%1,513 LV
from 2026-10-06HighGround ↗D+16.8D 50.5% · R 33.7%400 LV
from 2026-10-06GrayHouse ↗Friends of Elijah NortonD+6.0D 50% · R 44%550 LV
from 2026-09-01Equis Research ↗D+6.0D 49% · R 43%1,214 RV
Explore each poll’s weight in the average

8 of 30 matching · 30 total

Poll average D+7.4

HighGround25 Oct · 400 LV · added 27 Oct
RedBox Research (D)23 Oct · 2,686 LV · added 27 Oct
GrayHouse20 Oct · 550 LV · added 23 Oct
GrayHouse8 Oct · 550 LV · added 11 Oct
HighGround8 Oct · 400 LV · added 13 Oct
Wick6 Oct · 1,513 LV · added 14 Oct
GQR (D)5 Oct · 600 LV · added 8 Oct
BSP Research4 Oct · 1,300 RV · added 20 Oct
Explore all 30 polls for this race

How the margin was built

Tap an input for its calculation and source.

Toward D+16.5
Toward R−10.3
Forecast marginD+6.2

Displayed values are rounded.

All calculations & sources

How this state voted, 2024 −5.530 points

The state's presidential margin in 2024 as a share of all votes cast, from our own county sums — the same measurement the model's statewide terrain center is built from. Every pull below is measured from here, not from EVEN, which is why a landslide seat's listed pulls are small numbers and still land where the forecast does.

  • 2024 presidential result for this state, as a share of all votes cast, from Call the Map's own county sums.
  • Same source as Act I's 2024-president reference mark, so the origin lands on it.

Fitted model, above the terrain shown +13.148 points

What the fitted model adds on top of the starting terrain above — incumbency, past results, campaign finance and the other fitted terms — measured from that terrain rather than from EVEN. It is a comparison with the starting point already shown, not a separate input. The source detail lists the variables the fit uses.

  • Fitted baseline 7.618 minus starting point -5.530 = 13.148 points.
  • Fitted intercept: -6.136 points.
  • 2010 White population share used by the frozen historical fit: observed input 73.036. -0.503 × ((73.036 − 77.922) / 12.864) = 0.191 points.
  • gov_midterm_wh: observed input -1.000. -0.987 × ((-1.000 − 0.336) / 0.739) = 1.785 points.
  • 2024 presidential lean relative to the national result: observed input -4.088. 4.163 × ((-4.088 − -4.415) / 20.258) = 0.067 points.
  • Previous governor election margin: observed input 0.670. 1.755 × ((0.670 − -3.131) / 19.227) = 0.347 points.
  • gov_inc_running_signed: observed input 1.000. 2.531 × ((1.000 − -0.120) / 0.708) = 4.001 points.
  • gov_inc_tenure_signed: observed input 1.000. 3.340 × ((1.000 − -0.143) / 0.902) = 4.232 points.
  • The displayed arithmetic is rounded; the fitted terms use full precision. The intercept plus these five terms gives the non-ratings baseline.
  • No source-verified current Gallup reading supports the former 40% / July 2026 claim. The current Gallup series ends in 2025; the Presidency Project identifies its 2026 observations as other pollsters. Use the unchanged fitted missing-value rule, not a replacement polling scale.
  • Certified 2024 presidential baseline: state R+5.6, national R+1.5; subtracting the national margin gives relative lean −4.1. Source: FEC compilation of certified state results.

National environment +1.832 points

The contribution to this race’s margin, not the national polling margin itself. The race’s loading, reference level and polling blend determine how much of the national climate reaches its final forecast.

  • The national environment in this edition is D+8.4. This row is its contribution to the race’s prior, not a claim that the country is D+1.8.
  • This step’s recorded contribution to the margin is +1.8.
  • The elasticity is fitted on the pooled panel of contested governor races (2010–2024) with cycle-clustered standard errors; it is a measured response to the national environment, not a judgment floor.

Historical error calibration +1.517 points

A prior-election residual correction, when an admitted model publishes one.

  • The forecast’s calibration against past governor results. The recorded contribution is +1.5.

This race’s polls −4.579 points

What this race’s own recent polling adds beyond its prior. The forecast weights each poll for recency and sample size and counts each pollster once; the weights listed here are those of the polls’ own average.

  • HighGround (2026-10-25, n=400): D+12.2 · weight 0.53 in the poll average
  • RedBox Research (D) (2026-10-23, n=2,686): D+5.0 · weight 0.94 in the poll average
  • GrayHouse (2026-10-20, n=550): D+6.0 · weight 0.58 in the poll average
  • HighGround (2026-10-08, n=400): D+16.8 · weight 0.43 in the poll average
  • GrayHouse (2026-10-08, n=550): D+6.0 · weight 0.51 in the poll average
  • Wick (2026-10-06, n=1,513): D+5.7 · weight 0.78 in the poll average
  • … and 24 more below.
  • Poll average D+7.4, from 24 polls · 30 recorded polls. This is the polls’ own average, each poll at its published margin, the figure this page’s poll summary shows. In governor races the forecast then counts a poll sponsored by a party or campaign at full weight and moves its margin 2 points against that party, which puts the average it reads at D+7.3. It then applies a fitted correction of 2.5 points toward Republicans for governor races, measured from past polling error, before blending it with its other evidence. The forecast gives the polls 98% of the weight against its structural prior for this race, which moves the margin 4.6 points toward Republicans from where it stood before the polls. Eligible polls: latest poll: 2026-10-25 (4 days old).

Votes for other candidates −0.162 points

Every step above is measured between the two major-party candidates alone, as if nobody else were on the ballot. The forecast sets 2.5% of the vote aside for other candidates and write-ins, so as a share of every vote cast the gap between the two is smaller by that much. This step is exactly that: the two-party margin times the share going to other candidates. It is the same arithmetic that turns the two-party margin into the two shares printed at the top of the page.

The components this edition publishes for this race, in points. “Other factors” closes the sum to the two-party structural lean exactly. The margin the page prints is a share of every vote cast, so the “Votes for other candidates” row carries the exact difference between the two-party lean and that margin; with it, the walk sums to the printed margin exactly.

Named factorContribution
FundamentalsThe admitted fitted baseline. Its surviving variables differ by office; the source detail above identifies those used for this race.+7.62
This race's pollsAdmitted head-to-head polls of this race, recency- and quality-weighted.−4.58
National environmentThe national environment’s contribution to the prior. Polling can attenuate its influence; this value is not the national polling margin.+1.83
Historical calibrationThe House lane's calibration against certified past cycles.+1.52
Other factors0.00

Where the votes are

The map of this race loads here.

Recent elections

ElectionResultVotes cast
2022 · Governor ↗D+0.72,558,665
2018 · Governor ↗R+14.22,376,441
2014 · Governor ↗R+11.81,506,322
2010 · Governor ↗R+11.91,728,081

Margins are the Democrat’s share of all votes cast minus the Republican’s.

Race context

Turnout, 2018 midterm
46.8% 2,409,910 ballots
Turnout, 2022 midterm
49.3% 2,592,313 ballots
2024 presidential margin
R+5.6between the two parties

Turnout is ballots cast statewide as a share of the voting-eligible population. Source: University of Florida Election Lab ↗

Population profile

White alone · 66.7%4,781,702 of 7,172,282 · Residents2022 Census · matched race geography

Coverage

Forecast as of October 28, 2026: Call the Map currently has Katie Hobbs ahead of Andy Biggs by D+6.2, with an 86 in 100 chance to win. The seat is currently held by a Democrat. That result would keep the seat with Democrats. The current poll average is D+7.4; 30 public polls are recorded.